British PM Keir Starmer Wants NATO & US Combat Troops in Ukraine as Peacekeepers

British PM Keir Starmer Wants NATO & US Combat Troops in Ukraine as Peacekeepers​


Not while trump is president
 
A division consisting of French and British troops sent to Ukraine should have a proud and historically significant name—“Dunkirk” would be perfect.
 

"British PM Keir Starmer Says He Will Organize EU Ceasefire Security Force with France +2, and Count on U.S. Military Backstop From Trump


March 2, 2025 | Sundance |


British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is holding a Ukraine summit in London today with EU leaders, following two phone calls with President Trump.

According to the outline Starmer proposed on BBC News, following the disastrous Zelenskyy meeting in the White House, the British PM called President Trump and also Emmanuel Macron. According to his statements, Starmer told Trump he would work with Macron +2 unidentified countries (a “coalition of the willing”), to organize an EU security force for a Ukraine ceasefire; then the group will require Trump to provide a U.S. troop “backstop” as an insurance policy.

Starmer completely ignores the NATO provocations against Russia that preceded the military operation by Vladimir Putin, instead blaming only the aggression of Putin for the expansion of NATO in Europe. Interview Below:"







This is insane. There is no way NATO troops should be in Ukraine and US troops is out of the question. If Starmer and Macron really wanted peace they would want neutral peacekeepers. This is a recipe for WWIII. Why do these WEF globalist progressives want us on the brink of WWII?

Not gonna happen. This is the EU trying to drag us into the War directly.

If they want to impress they need to go to Wartime production and draft now.
 
That would be like giving money to an addict or alcoholic, and expecting them not to use it on booze and drugs.


The crown has been obsessed with destroying Russia for longer than we have been a nation.
The British ruling class have a fixation with Russia, i believe it goes back at least and probably before the Russian revolution in 1917, in 1918 with another coalition we invaded Russia, the Russian royal family were related our Royals and others in Europe, so the hate has been there a long time, but the average Joe couldn't give a rats arse.
 
The British ruling class have a fixation with Russia, i believe it goes back at least and probably before the Russian revolution in 1917, in 1918 with another coalition we invaded Russia, the Russian royal family were related our Royals and others in Europe, so the hate has been there a long time, but the average Joe couldn't give a rats arse.
 
On June 12, 1935, Mussolini banned the sale of the New York Times in Italy “for its biased coverage of Fascist activities”.
Amusingly, 90 years later, RT, Sputnik and other Russian media are banned in the West for the same reason.
 
15th post
On June 12, 1935, Mussolini banned the sale of the New York Times in Italy “for its biased coverage of Fascist activities”.
Amusingly, 90 years later, RT, Sputnik and other Russian media are banned in the West for the same reason.
You can pick up those newspapers but only at the ones who decide to carry them. I use to get them for school discussion classes as a teen. Also the KKK news and others. :)

NATO /U.S.A. forces would be a mistake in Ukraine/Russia conflict. U.N. forces from nations with no dog in the fight would be the best plan.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom