Brianna Taylor grand jury in

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
24,049
Reaction score
4,411
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
The police were fired at and acted in self defense
the guy had legal use of a gun and he fired at intruders.
You just can face facts... they had a no knock warrant, but THEY KNOCKED ANYWAYS, which turned out to be a bad move. He didn’t fire at intruders, intruders by the legal definition have no right to be in the home. With the warrant they had the UNEQUIVOCAL right to be there. He fired upon cops, and despite the lies cnn and msnbc spewed, she was awake and standing behind him.

A legally purchased gun doesn’t allow you to fire at anyone, much less cops. In addition she was not innocent the warrant was for her, because of the illegal work she was doing for her ex-BF, man she knows how to pick them.
You have a tenuous grasp of due process.
Due Process was even discussed moron!
Due process says she is innocent until proven guilty. Why do you struggle with that ?
Why do you struggle with the fact the they had a valid warrant for her arrested? This has nothing to do with her innocence or guilt, rather they had the full right to enter her home unannounced (which they still announced themselves) and her boyfriend fired at the police.
You are talking about the Black woman shot in her own home right ?
Read slowly... because that is not what I am talking about. You brought up due process, yet the cops got a VALID NO KNOCK warrant to search her home. They still knocked. Her boyfriend shot at the cops, WHO HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE IN THE HOME AND DO IT BY FORCED ENTRY. Note: the BF originally told the cops she was the one that shot at the cops. The cops fired back and she was struck. Not one of her rights were trampled on.

This case actually is proof why a no knock warrant is necessary. If they just executed the no knock, they would have gotten the jump on the BF and there would have been no shots and no story for t he fake news narrative.
A person's home is sovereign.
There is very little justification for ever issuing a warrant for a home, and the ONLY excuse for a no-knock warrant is when there is a hostage at risk.
You can NOT legally issue a no-knock warrant to collect evidence, on a private home.
You have to already have all the necessary evidence before a warrant can be issued.
So the warrant was totally invalid.
There was no evidence.
They were at the wrong old address, the person they wanted was already in custody.

And NO, there is only one person who said the police identified themselves, and that was only after he changed his testimony. Walker and the rest of the building say the police never replied to Walker yelling who was breaking in.

And no, police do NOT have any right to break down a door in the middle of the night, and never can have that right, unless there is a hostage.

Although Walker fired the first shot, that was legal, in self defense, of an obvious plain clothes home invasion.
It is illegal for police to conduct a raid out of uniform.

And regardless of who shot first, police to not then have a right of self defense, to shoot indiscriminately.
They are paid to accept risks and not risk the lives of anyone else, by firing indiscriminately, as they clearly did.
They clearly were guilty of reckless endangerment at the very least. But since they got the wrong address and came in the middle of the night, they get ALL the blame for everything. They MADE everything happen. So then they ARE guilty of murder.

There is NEVER a legal or rational excuse for no-knock warrants, that violate the basic hierarchy of rights.
If they had followed the law, and came during the day, no one would have been harmed, and everyone would have been happy with the outsome.
But she was black so she must have done something ?
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
19,548
Reaction score
3,339
Points
215
The police were fired at and acted in self defense
the guy had legal use of a gun and he fired at intruders.
You just can face facts... they had a no knock warrant, but THEY KNOCKED ANYWAYS, which turned out to be a bad move. He didn’t fire at intruders, intruders by the legal definition have no right to be in the home. With the warrant they had the UNEQUIVOCAL right to be there. He fired upon cops, and despite the lies cnn and msnbc spewed, she was awake and standing behind him.

A legally purchased gun doesn’t allow you to fire at anyone, much less cops. In addition she was not innocent the warrant was for her, because of the illegal work she was doing for her ex-BF, man she knows how to pick them.
You have a tenuous grasp of due process.
Due Process was even discussed moron!
Due process says she is innocent until proven guilty. Why do you struggle with that ?
Why do you struggle with the fact the they had a valid warrant for her arrested? This has nothing to do with her innocence or guilt, rather they had the full right to enter her home unannounced (which they still announced themselves) and her boyfriend fired at the police.
Yes . If the cops want to enter , you agree and deal with it later in court
But blacks don’t think as we do
You lie and hold a double standard so yeah.
Monday morning QB against the police is a leftist trait. Smh they don’t learn
Laws are the law Monday, Tuesday. Wednesday or whatever day it is. The laws don't just apply to the people.
 

GHook20

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
133
Reaction score
170
Points
43
Location
Las Vegas
The police were fired at and acted in self defense
the guy had legal use of a gun and he fired at intruders.
You just can face facts... they had a no knock warrant, but THEY KNOCKED ANYWAYS, which turned out to be a bad move. He didn’t fire at intruders, intruders by the legal definition have no right to be in the home. With the warrant they had the UNEQUIVOCAL right to be there. He fired upon cops, and despite the lies cnn and msnbc spewed, she was awake and standing behind him.

A legally purchased gun doesn’t allow you to fire at anyone, much less cops. In addition she was not innocent the warrant was for her, because of the illegal work she was doing for her ex-BF, man she knows how to pick them.
You have a tenuous grasp of due process.
Due Process was even discussed moron!
Due process says she is innocent until proven guilty. Why do you struggle with that ?
Why do you struggle with the fact the they had a valid warrant for her arrested? This has nothing to do with her innocence or guilt, rather they had the full right to enter her home unannounced (which they still announced themselves) and her boyfriend fired at the police.
You are talking about the Black woman shot in her own home right ?
Read slowly... because that is not what I am talking about. You brought up due process, yet the cops got a VALID NO KNOCK warrant to search her home. They still knocked. Her boyfriend shot at the cops, WHO HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE IN THE HOME AND DO IT BY FORCED ENTRY. Note: the BF originally told the cops she was the one that shot at the cops. The cops fired back and she was struck. Not one of her rights were trampled on.

This case actually is proof why a no knock warrant is necessary. If they just executed the no knock, they would have gotten the jump on the BF and there would have been no shots and no story for t he fake news narrative.
A person's home is sovereign.
There is very little justification for ever issuing a warrant for a home, and the ONLY excuse for a no-knock warrant is when there is a hostage at risk.
You can NOT legally issue a no-knock warrant to collect evidence, on a private home.
You have to already have all the necessary evidence before a warrant can be issued.
So the warrant was totally invalid.
There was no evidence.
They were at the wrong old address, the person they wanted was already in custody.

And NO, there is only one person who said the police identified themselves, and that was only after he changed his testimony. Walker and the rest of the building say the police never replied to Walker yelling who was breaking in.

And no, police do NOT have any right to break down a door in the middle of the night, and never can have that right, unless there is a hostage.

Although Walker fired the first shot, that was legal, in self defense, of an obvious plain clothes home invasion.
It is illegal for police to conduct a raid out of uniform.

And regardless of who shot first, police to not then have a right of self defense, to shoot indiscriminately.
They are paid to accept risks and not risk the lives of anyone else, by firing indiscriminately, as they clearly did.
They clearly were guilty of reckless endangerment at the very least. But since they got the wrong address and came in the middle of the night, they get ALL the blame for everything. They MADE everything happen. So then they ARE guilty of murder.

There is NEVER a legal or rational excuse for no-knock warrants, that violate the basic hierarchy of rights.
If they had followed the law, and came during the day, no one would have been harmed, and everyone would have been happy with the outsome.
But she was black so she must have done something ?
Sir we call that a red herring. A warrant would have been obtained if on a white or green person in the same situation and if the BF if a white or green person shot at and hit a cop then the cops would have shot back regardless.
It is amazing that leftist now don’t want cops to shoot back when fired upon and even shot themselves!
 

GHook20

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
133
Reaction score
170
Points
43
Location
Las Vegas
The police were fired at and acted in self defense
the guy had legal use of a gun and he fired at intruders.
You just can face facts... they had a no knock warrant, but THEY KNOCKED ANYWAYS, which turned out to be a bad move. He didn’t fire at intruders, intruders by the legal definition have no right to be in the home. With the warrant they had the UNEQUIVOCAL right to be there. He fired upon cops, and despite the lies cnn and msnbc spewed, she was awake and standing behind him.

A legally purchased gun doesn’t allow you to fire at anyone, much less cops. In addition she was not innocent the warrant was for her, because of the illegal work she was doing for her ex-BF, man she knows how to pick them.
You have a tenuous grasp of due process.
Due Process was even discussed moron!
Due process says she is innocent until proven guilty. Why do you struggle with that ?
Why do you struggle with the fact the they had a valid warrant for her arrested? This has nothing to do with her innocence or guilt, rather they had the full right to enter her home unannounced (which they still announced themselves) and her boyfriend fired at the police.
You are talking about the Black woman shot in her own home right ?
Read slowly... because that is not what I am talking about. You brought up due process, yet the cops got a VALID NO KNOCK warrant to search her home. They still knocked. Her boyfriend shot at the cops, WHO HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE IN THE HOME AND DO IT BY FORCED ENTRY. Note: the BF originally told the cops she was the one that shot at the cops. The cops fired back and she was struck. Not one of her rights were trampled on.

This case actually is proof why a no knock warrant is necessary. If they just executed the no knock, they would have gotten the jump on the BF and there would have been no shots and no story for t he fake news narrative.
A person's home is sovereign.
There is very little justification for ever issuing a warrant for a home, and the ONLY excuse for a no-knock warrant is when there is a hostage at risk.
You can NOT legally issue a no-knock warrant to collect evidence, on a private home.
You have to already have all the necessary evidence before a warrant can be issued.
So the warrant was totally invalid.
There was no evidence.
They were at the wrong old address, the person they wanted was already in custody.

And NO, there is only one person who said the police identified themselves, and that was only after he changed his testimony. Walker and the rest of the building say the police never replied to Walker yelling who was breaking in.

And no, police do NOT have any right to break down a door in the middle of the night, and never can have that right, unless there is a hostage.

Although Walker fired the first shot, that was legal, in self defense, of an obvious plain clothes home invasion.
It is illegal for police to conduct a raid out of uniform.

And regardless of who shot first, police to not then have a right of self defense, to shoot indiscriminately.
They are paid to accept risks and not risk the lives of anyone else, by firing indiscriminately, as they clearly did.
They clearly were guilty of reckless endangerment at the very least. But since they got the wrong address and came in the middle of the night, they get ALL the blame for everything. They MADE everything happen. So then they ARE guilty of murder.

There is NEVER a legal or rational excuse for no-knock warrants, that violate the basic hierarchy of rights.
If they had followed the law, and came during the day, no one would have been harmed, and everyone would have been happy with the outsome.
You are wrong all nearly all accounts! Nearly all.

A no knock warrant was determined valid by the SCOTUS when the police alerting themselves presents a danger. Obviously that was the case here, because they did announce themselves and a officer was shot.
The 4th amendment clearly allows searching someone’s home with a valid warrant... study harder. You are not secure in your home if the officers have a valid warrant OR have probable cause. They had a valid warrant.
 

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
24,049
Reaction score
4,411
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
The police were fired at and acted in self defense
the guy had legal use of a gun and he fired at intruders.
You just can face facts... they had a no knock warrant, but THEY KNOCKED ANYWAYS, which turned out to be a bad move. He didn’t fire at intruders, intruders by the legal definition have no right to be in the home. With the warrant they had the UNEQUIVOCAL right to be there. He fired upon cops, and despite the lies cnn and msnbc spewed, she was awake and standing behind him.

A legally purchased gun doesn’t allow you to fire at anyone, much less cops. In addition she was not innocent the warrant was for her, because of the illegal work she was doing for her ex-BF, man she knows how to pick them.
You have a tenuous grasp of due process.
Due Process was even discussed moron!
Due process says she is innocent until proven guilty. Why do you struggle with that ?
Why do you struggle with the fact the they had a valid warrant for her arrested? This has nothing to do with her innocence or guilt, rather they had the full right to enter her home unannounced (which they still announced themselves) and her boyfriend fired at the police.
You are talking about the Black woman shot in her own home right ?
Read slowly... because that is not what I am talking about. You brought up due process, yet the cops got a VALID NO KNOCK warrant to search her home. They still knocked. Her boyfriend shot at the cops, WHO HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE IN THE HOME AND DO IT BY FORCED ENTRY. Note: the BF originally told the cops she was the one that shot at the cops. The cops fired back and she was struck. Not one of her rights were trampled on.

This case actually is proof why a no knock warrant is necessary. If they just executed the no knock, they would have gotten the jump on the BF and there would have been no shots and no story for t he fake news narrative.
A person's home is sovereign.
There is very little justification for ever issuing a warrant for a home, and the ONLY excuse for a no-knock warrant is when there is a hostage at risk.
You can NOT legally issue a no-knock warrant to collect evidence, on a private home.
You have to already have all the necessary evidence before a warrant can be issued.
So the warrant was totally invalid.
There was no evidence.
They were at the wrong old address, the person they wanted was already in custody.

And NO, there is only one person who said the police identified themselves, and that was only after he changed his testimony. Walker and the rest of the building say the police never replied to Walker yelling who was breaking in.

And no, police do NOT have any right to break down a door in the middle of the night, and never can have that right, unless there is a hostage.

Although Walker fired the first shot, that was legal, in self defense, of an obvious plain clothes home invasion.
It is illegal for police to conduct a raid out of uniform.

And regardless of who shot first, police to not then have a right of self defense, to shoot indiscriminately.
They are paid to accept risks and not risk the lives of anyone else, by firing indiscriminately, as they clearly did.
They clearly were guilty of reckless endangerment at the very least. But since they got the wrong address and came in the middle of the night, they get ALL the blame for everything. They MADE everything happen. So then they ARE guilty of murder.

There is NEVER a legal or rational excuse for no-knock warrants, that violate the basic hierarchy of rights.
If they had followed the law, and came during the day, no one would have been harmed, and everyone would have been happy with the outsome.
But she was black so she must have done something ?
Sir we call that a red herring. A warrant would have been obtained if on a white or green person in the same situation and if the BF if a white or green person shot at and hit a cop then the cops would have shot back regardless.
It is amazing that leftist now don’t want cops to shoot back when fired upon and even shot themselves!
Cops should not fire back when there is a danger of hitting innocent people. That is shit policing. They should have retreated to a safe point, called for backup, got out the loud hailer and had a coffee. Ms Taylor would still be with us and the city would be $12m better off.
That would be a good outcome.
But you live in a country where you do not value life and the police are allowed to act like central american death squads. Civilised standards do not apply.
 

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
60,018
Reaction score
8,288
Points
2,070
REAKING: We just learned, definitively, that Louisville Police Officer Joshua Jaynes flat out lied under oath about all of the details on the warrant for the no knock raid at Breonna’s home. ⁣

The warrant was illegal. They had NO CAUSE to be there. So they falsified it. ⁣

Joshua Jaynes falsified the whole warrant. Then lied about it again later under oath later. ⁣

1. Please find me more images of this man. ⁣

2. He needs to be fired immediately. ⁣

3. He needs to be charged with this crime. ⁣

4. Put this man’s name EVERYWHERE when you say who needs to be held accountable.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
19,548
Reaction score
3,339
Points
215
REAKING: We just learned, definitively, that Louisville Police Officer Joshua Jaynes flat out lied under oath about all of the details on the warrant for the no knock raid at Breonna’s home. ⁣

The warrant was illegal. They had NO CAUSE to be there. So they falsified it. ⁣

Joshua Jaynes falsified the whole warrant. Then lied about it again later under oath later. ⁣

1. Please find me more images of this man. ⁣

2. He needs to be fired immediately. ⁣

3. He needs to be charged with this crime. ⁣

4. Put this man’s name EVERYWHERE when you say who needs to be held accountable.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top