Breitbart...full blown Racist

[konradv]

so she was a racist, just like you claim Brietbart is I doubt she's changed her stripse.. trash bucket.

Again, you missed the entire message of her presentation. The point was SHE HAS changed. You need to turn FOX off and allow your brain cells heal...wait they can't heal...Well, then you could run with Sarah Palin in 2012, even with damaged brain cells. Beside her, no one will notice.

Right she has changed.. haha I have a bridge I want to sell you too.

I prefer to believe the farmer she helped. If you can't take his word, then this is all about "gotcha" not justice.

 

[Tank]

Oh, I dunno - does the NAACP wear hoods? Lynch white people? Make them drink at different fountains? Sit at the back of a bus? Make a white person stand so a black person can sit down?

This is what they strive for.

 

[GHook93]

The man was sent an edited clipped which clearly showed black racism of the AUDIENCE!!! I guess you guys missed the part when they cheered her admitting that she didn't help the white farmer because he was white.

I the media reaction (and mine included when hearing the tape) was to jump all over the speaker, who in reality made a speech that ALL black people should hear. Its not about race its about poor vs not poor. She is a true patroit and MLK and Douglass would be very brought of her.

Nevertheless, the black audience cheers when she admitted she racially discriminated was horrendous. It would be like a banker saying yep I passed on giving a loan to a creditworthy ******, simply because I rather give a loan to a fellow white man and then the crowd going nutz!

Seconded.

Andrew Breitbart committed an act of pure racism. He defamed a black woman for the purposes of discrediting an organization devoted to the advancement of black people.

His actions were racist. His motive was racist.

In a time when everyone loves to complain that the term 'racist' is thrown around much too loosely, too frequently, and too often without sufficient cause,

this time it was unequivocal, irrefutable, undiluted, unadulterated, and indisputable

RACISM.

Agreed.

The man is scum.

 

[Barb]

so it's fair to call him a race hustler...

what did she mean "take him to his own kind"?

Obviously she meant white people. She was talking about how she felt at the time ... 20 some odd years ago, you ******* piece of trash.

She was also talking about how working with the white rural poor improved her understanding of our similarities. The whole talk was about bias overcome and replaced with that understanding.
It was a good speech, and its sad that the keystone "gotcha" cops had to go and show yet again that reaching out in a personal way, exposing one's own development to help others progress themselves will be met with pure bullshit. This kind of hyperbole is designed to intimidate others form offering these teachable examples of personal growth, and retards the opportunity for that growth to inspire others to evolve.

 

[MarcATL]

Oh, I dunno - does the NAACP wear hoods? Lynch white people? Make them drink at different fountains? Sit at the back of a bus? Make a white person stand so a black person can sit down?

This is what they strive for.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

No facts, just pure ideology and BS conjecture. RightWing to the core.

*wipes tears from my eyes*

 

[MarcATL]

No you of pond scum, the audience WASN'T cheering her not helping the white farmers. They were cheering at her overcoming her previous views. Look at the video clip again you piece of dung.

 

[xotoxi]

Andrew Breitbart committed an act of pure racism. He defamed a black woman for the purposes of discrediting an organization devoted to the advancement of black people.

Weren't the nazis a organization devoted to the advancement of white people?

Yes. You are right. The Nazi were an organization devoted to the advancement of white people.

Hey Tank...come to think of it, YOU are devoted to the advancement of white people.

Here's an idea for your avatar:

 

[Coyote]

I would say ummmmm..... yeah it would be.

That is when they were cheering correct?

Was it? Were they cheering her before? Were they cheering her after? How do you know exactly what they were cheering?

She was talking to a bunch of crackah hating NAACP members.... Andrew is just using the lefts own tactics against them and it is killing them.

Unbelievable that you would make excuses for what he did.

Many organizations have racist members, including NAACP and the Tea Party movement.

Rather than addressing the racist fringe, "Andrew" chooses to slander a totally innocent person.

Interesting that you somehow find that commendable and admire it. The Tea Party movement, on the other hand chose to address racism in a more constructive way. They have expelled Mark Williams and his racist fringe.

Not an excuse, it is what he said and pointed out how they were applauding and cheering. I really do try to stick to the facts. the man admitted that the tape had portions edited out, most news reports do edit for content. It's what they do. Fact is the crowd did not know where her story was leading and they were cheering and applauding her as a racist. I don't see how anyone can deny this; if they watched the video.

Ollie, what were you listening to? I went and found a video of the entire 43 minute speech:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk]YouTube - Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video[/ame]

The relevant portion occurs approx at 17.35 minutes. There is no cheering or applauding. At the beginning when she says "and I was trying to decide how much to help him" there is a little bit of laughter.

Between that and when she says that she came to realize that it is not just a matter of black and white, but have and have not - there is no cheering or applauding.

It's a good, and heartfelt speech of someone recognizing and overcoming her own prejudices.

It is very sad, to me, that this can not be seen in the current toxic climate

 

[Coyote]

Why doesn't the White House have any responsibility in this? They fired the women or demanded she resign before they even asked her what her side of the story was.

They do.

That has been pointed out - shame on the Obama Administration for not checking facts!

At least, they are coming forward and admitting they wronged her.

Brietbart isn't.

 

[Coyote]

Andrew Breitbart committed an act of pure racism. He defamed a black woman for the purposes of discrediting an organization devoted to the advancement of black people.

His actions were racist. His motive was racist.

In a time when everyone loves to complain that the term 'racist' is thrown around much too loosely, too frequently, and too often without sufficient cause,

this time it was unequivocal, irrefutable, undiluted, unadulterated, and indisputable

RACISM.

You mean that one person took another person's words and twisted them to make a point (isn't that out of the left's play book?)? Or do you mean that a person took another person's words and played the part where the "organization" applauded a blatant act of racism? Did you notice when she spoke of revelation (it is the economic situation that unites us more than color), there was no applause? This is the NAACP, a group that is SUPPOSED to be against RACISM, but practice racism in their own meetings. The woman was played and thrown under the bus. I believe she will win the lawsuits and retire a wealthy woman. Meanwhile, the NAACP and the president look like absolute hypocrits.

It's amazing how the rightwingnuts will twist and turn to avoid taking responsability for one of their own in an attempt to turn it back onto their opponents.

You talk about the playbook as if it were someone else's. Own up to your own.

The playbook is dear to the hearts of many a wingnut and moonbat.

 

[GWV5903]

No you of pond scum, the audience WASN'T cheering her not helping the white farmers. They were cheering at her overcoming her previous views. Look at the video clip again you piece of dung.

In no way is this a defense of Breitbart, you need to review the tape again, at 17:29 when she declares she was trying to decide what kind of help she was going to give him, that is laughter, if you believe the intent was for something else, you are quit disingenuous, which is what continues the stupidity of racism from all parties, black, white and brown....

Speaking for myself, this record is broken and has been most of my adult life, let it go. The NAACP, the WH and USDA where just as much if not more to blame, they did a terrible job with this, when do we learn that? If you continue to only blame the right or Breitbart you miss her point, entirely.....

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Yea but you Socialist/Progressive nutters call everyone a racist. So how much credibitlity do you guys really have at this point? I think most Americans are pretty sick of your Race-Baiting stuff. You guys have divided this nation so much since gaining power. Don't think that the people haven't noticed. Your Divide & Conquer game could very well backfire on you guys. God i hope so. Make 2010 count people!

 

[GWV5903]

Was it? Were they cheering her before? Were they cheering her after? How do you know exactly what they were cheering?



Unbelievable that you would make excuses for what he did.

Many organizations have racist members, including NAACP and the Tea Party movement.

Rather than addressing the racist fringe, "Andrew" chooses to slander a totally innocent person.

Interesting that you somehow find that commendable and admire it. The Tea Party movement, on the other hand chose to address racism in a more constructive way. They have expelled Mark Williams and his racist fringe.

Not an excuse, it is what he said and pointed out how they were applauding and cheering. I really do try to stick to the facts. the man admitted that the tape had portions edited out, most news reports do edit for content. It's what they do. Fact is the crowd did not know where her story was leading and they were cheering and applauding her as a racist. I don't see how anyone can deny this; if they watched the video.

Ollie, what were you listening to? I went and found a video of the entire 43 minute speech:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk]YouTube - Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video[/ame]

The relevant portion occurs approx at 17.35 minutes. There is no cheering or applauding. At the beginning when she says "and I was trying to decide how much to help him" there is a little bit of laughter.Between that and when she says that she came to realize that it is not just a matter of black and white, but have and have not - there is no cheering or applauding.

It's a good, and heartfelt speech of someone recognizing and overcoming her own prejudices.

It is very sad, to me, that this can not be seen in the current toxic climate

You believe the laughter isn't condescending? Come on, you're stretching....

I do believe she has a good understanding where she was wrong and made a change for the better, I am encouraged to see that she tried to communicate this message.....

 

[Ravi]

Not an excuse, it is what he said and pointed out how they were applauding and cheering. I really do try to stick to the facts. the man admitted that the tape had portions edited out, most news reports do edit for content. It's what they do. Fact is the crowd did not know where her story was leading and they were cheering and applauding her as a racist. I don't see how anyone can deny this; if they watched the video.

Ollie, what were you listening to? I went and found a video of the entire 43 minute speech:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk"]YouTube - Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video[/ame]

The relevant portion occurs approx at 17.35 minutes. There is no cheering or applauding. At the beginning when she says "and I was trying to decide how much to help him" there is a little bit of laughter.Between that and when she says that she came to realize that it is not just a matter of black and white, but have and have not - there is no cheering or applauding.

It's a good, and heartfelt speech of someone recognizing and overcoming her own prejudices.

It is very sad, to me, that this can not be seen in the current toxic climate

You believe the laughter isn't condescending? Come on, you're stretching....

I do believe she has a good understanding where she was wrong and made a change for the better, I am encouraged to see that she tried to communicate this message.....

Do you think they should be charged with a hate crime for laughing?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

One thing we all know for sure is...The Socialists/Progressives sure have worked incredibly hard to divide our nation. Their endless Race-Baiting has led to this kind of blunder by this President. His own Race-Baiting strategy just blew up in his face. I think it's actually pretty entertaining. They really have tried to divide the nation intentionally. Hopefully this will blow up in all Democrats' faces in coming Elections. The People have noticed what they're doing. The Socialists/Progressives gotta go. Make it happen in 2010 America.

 

[Gatekeeper]

isn't an organization devoted to the advancement of an entire race of people racist?

Many would cry racist , IF it was a 'White's Only Organization'. I Googled both, I cannot find and 'Whites Only Organizations', maybe someone else can. It seems those crying 'racism' the most, many are are racists themselves.
Here's one from Google. Check out how many Black only organizations there are.

BlackNews.com - Black Organizations | African American Organizations

I, for one, am for getting rid of ALL 'single race' organizations, they discriminate against all others while concentrating on their race only, which causes even more racial division. Many blacks say they are against segregation in schools, yet they call out for segregation in their organizations. When will this double standard stop?

The final question....WHO is really racist after all? When can we all just STFU and get along?Does anyone realize how many people profit from keeping us all divided and fighting? We have to wake up and put a stop to this BS, end ALL single race only organizations, contests, clubs, and those that would protest that........what will we call them?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Maybe Hopey Changey should just pull over and resign immediately? I think that would be best for our nation. I love watching their Race-Baiting game blow up in their faces. This really is fun.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I listened to the entire 43 minutes.

I cannot fault Breitbart, nor can I positively say he is correct.

I do believe there were some racial overtones during her speech, yet I also understand that it was a function of an organization I consider racist simply because of what they stand for. And her speech was geared toward her audience.

I also wonder what was edited out at the 21 minute mark.

Anyway it all simply shows that there is still racism out there, even with the great Divider in office.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Hey America,aren't you sick of this Socialist/Progressive Race-Baiting game yet? The Democrats have intentionally divided the nation with their endless Race-Baiting. Just more Divide & Conquer coming from them. Just give them the boot and be done with it. 2010 could be a great year for America. Make it happen America.

 

[MarcATL]

SFC Ollie....

What does the NAACP stand for?

IF its the Advancement of colored people that you're so against and find racist then you are responding and acting foolishly towards it.

I say that because its not in a bubble we live in. In a bubble, that might SEEM racist, however, considering the country's history concerning race and the past, ongoing, lingering and continuing effects of systematic racism, the FACT of the matter is minorities are at disadvantage...plain and simple.

Therefore, when they...we use terms such as "advancement of colored people" or whatever, its not from a standpoint of superiority or trying to take over...its simply a matter of trying to catch up...to finally reach a standard of equality/parity for all.

Believe it or not, we, as in America is FAR from there. And I say this realizing that America IS THE best country in the world as far as race relations are concerned, but its still far from where it should be.

If you don't or can't agree with what I just stated then you seriously just don't get it and will never understand. And thats why the Republicans will ALWAYS have problems with minorities...because they. just. don't. understand. And they act as if they don't CARE to understand.