Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

Judging by the comments online, the kill shot from the side of a car, after he was deliberately standing in front of it; suggests that this is going to be jumped on by MSM with great success.

If I am Trump, I stay out of this one as it is a no-win situation for him IMO. Just say "this is a tragedy and an investigation will determine the result".

There is a time to take a stand in a clear cut issue of self defense of civilian protecting his life. An armed agent and the situation around this woman in a car? Yes, she should obey instructions, but he cannot be judge, jury and executioner, he must have legal grounds for his actions.
there's a bullet hole in the front windshield ..


1767837510156.webp
 
Why is this a repeat thread? If this has been a poster on the right, it would have been gone before it went one page. :rolleyes:
Not the same thread. This is about an ICE murder. The other thread is a lie claiming a mother of three was an attempted murderer. That thread should be locked and in the Rubber Room.
 
So because she didnt, she deserved to die?
When she ignored a lawful order and chose to drive the vehicle into or at other ICE agents, yes. She ignored lawful orders to exit the vehicle!

When you ignore a lawful order that's a tick up in the force continuum. When you resist by engaging in dangerous actions with a lethal weapon (a 2000lb vehicle), when that action puts other agents or bystanders at risk for harm or death, that catapults you to the top of the force continuum. Lethal force is then warranted.

Obey lawful orders given by law enforcement personnel, do not resist, do not engage in life threatening behavior towards agents or bystanders, especially when you're driving a vehicle.

Period.
 
You’re wrong. When the ICE agent shot her, there was no one in front of the vehicle, and he shot her at point blank range. She should not have run off but that does not mean she deserved to die. What the Agent did was essentially the same as shooting a suspect in the back. There was no reason for it.
The officer was at the driver's side corner of the car and in front of that car. We know this because in the video from the rear, you can't see the officer. She was headed toward him until he shot her and her car veered right revealing him. Anyone with eyes and good sense can see what happened. She could have run him over and the other officer with his hand on the driver's door handle could have been dragged. She didn't give a shit.
 
You’re wrong. When the ICE agent shot her, there was no one in front of the vehicle, and he shot her at point blank range. She should not have run off but that does not mean she deserved to die. What the Agent did was essentially the same as shooting a suspect in the back. There was no reason for it.
The reverse angle of that video proves you uh... dead... wrong.

No pun intended.
 
Not the same thread. This is about an ICE murder. The other thread is a lie claiming a mother of three was an attempted murderer. That thread should be locked and in the Rubber Room.

It's the exact same thread with your title as a lie. 🤡
 
When she ignored a lawful order and chose to drive the vehicle into or at other ICE agents, yes. She ignored lawful orders to exit the vehicle!

When you ignore a lawful order that's a tick up in the force continuum. When you resist by engaging in dangerous actions with a lethal weapon (a 2000lb vehicle), when that action puts other agents or bystanders at risk for harm or death, that catapults you to the top of the force continuum. Lethal force is then warranted.

Obey lawful orders given by law enforcement personnel, do not resist, do not engage in life threatening behavior towards agents or bystanders, especially when you're driving a vehicle.

Period.
So she deserved to die because she refused an order from the govt?
 
Ok. Boot licking on this forum is not a minority.
Not saying anything like that, just sayin, not too bright trying to flee a federal scene, when being ordered out of the car…then try and gun it? I’d say a predictable outcome….thats just fact.
 
Why is this a repeat thread? If this has been a poster on the right, it would have been gone before it went one page. :rolleyes:

The flames at this forum have to be fanned to keep the revenue coming in. Besides, its SO easy to rile up zealots on both sides of the aisle into a year long fight over any issue major or minor.

Idiocracy comes to mind.
 
15th post
Actually it's important what the evidence shows. Didn't you turds learn anything after the George Floyd murder? I believe you were telling us all then that the cop was right and didn't have anything to worry about? That he had all of this immunity and everything?

Remember that?

How did that work out for that cop again?

You never know what a jury might come back with. We're going to find out .


He won't be charged as it is a Federal matter.
 
I'm not an expert and this is a serious question, is it standard for a cop to deliberately stand in front of a vehicle?

If so, man their training needs to be updated in my opinion.

Either he was headed to the vehicle from the other side to aid in getting her contained or he stood there to keep her from leaving. That didn't give her the right to run him down. I guess the next time a protestor blocks a highway they can just be run down, no problem.
 
Dupe....Reposting the same stuff you posted in this thread.


Cry about it 4 pages in. Lolz
 
Back
Top Bottom