Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

It’s working

don't think i hadn't noticed you never said a word about any of these factoids, zog zog zoggy zog zog.

Explain why we are protesting a police force?

you mean a poorly trained 'police' force who are profiling & detaining & arresting american citizens because they look brown?

a 'police ' force consisting of hired dregs found at gun shows, nascar, J6 proud boys & oathkeepers who are not following constitutional laws, re: due process?

a ' police ' force tasked with deporting the 'worst of the worst ', but seems to be nailing jose the landscaper & carmen the taco truck lady?

a ' police ' force who orchestrated an insane SWAT porn video depicting how they descended from helicopters onto the roof & busting thru the doors of that chicago apartment building looking for venezuelan gangsters, destroying tenet's apartments - including scores of american citizens... that resulted in 300 people being displaced, & conflicting reports of only 1, maybe 2 arrests?

hmmm.
 
Tyranny of taxes without representation?

Handed out out our tax dollars to illegals?

Putting them in hotels while vets homeless?

Too many regs, decrees put solar in your roof or else?

Let fake women go into womens bathrooms?

Drag Queens teaching kids?

Fake men in womens sports?

Take the jab or LOSE YOUR JOB?


Plenty of shit for a second civil war here.

Anytime yall feel skippy.

^^^

comic book guy.gif
 
You must be talking about Trump, he made the statement and your coward ass is afraid to call him on it. Thxs playing, you did exactly what I knew you would.
Huh? You really have some issues with reading comprehension.
 
Huh? You really have some issues with reading comprehension.
President Trump said in an interview that he believed civil rights-era protections resulted in white people being “very badly treated,” his strongest indication that the concept of “reverse discrimination” is driving his aggressive crusade against diversity policies.

So this is what you agree with.
 
President Trump said in an interview that he believed civil rights-era protections resulted in white people being “very badly treated,” his strongest indication that the concept of “reverse discrimination” is driving his aggressive crusade against diversity policies.

So this is what you agree with.
Correct, he did, and I answered your question. I agree, it did lead to people being discriminated against based on their race.

You seem to be fine with that, as we already discussed, and you confirmed.
 
As much as he may have fucked up, I still reserve more criticism for her. She was there to specifically and deliberately agitate the officers and obstruct their operation and got herself killed as a result of the very volatile situation she helped create.

He may have had responsibilities as a professionally trained officer but she had responsibilities as an adult not to interfere with law enforcement officers.

Looks like we agree on a lot. They’re both definitely at fault.

Where we disagree is on how much blame is to be placed on each one. I can give my thoughts on this and why but I don’t expect us to see eye-to-eye on it.

Good: I think she was trying to agitate ICE. Whether we agree with those views of her or not, I think much of what she was trying to do was still under the protection of the 1st Amendment. Where she crossed the line into breaking the law, in my opinion, is possibly a traffic violation as she had her vehicle in an awkward position and definitely when making contact with the officer. We agree that it was an accident but I think we’ll agree that she still deserves to be severely punished with jail time.

Russ: I’ve already explained that I think he handled the situation very poorly. I don’t think that was anything close to a lethal threat from that distance and that angle. He may have been extra trigger-happy due to the precious incident he had where a car dragged him.

I think we’ll agree that they’re both at fault. Here’s the difference as far as I’m concerned. While both of these people made mistakes, only one of these mistakes directly caused the death of another person.

I don’t think all mistakes are equal due to the significance of the outcome. An office worker making a big mistake on a report isn’t likely going to result a life/death situation. But if a pilot makes a big mistake, that result could be catastrophic as there are lives that depend on that pilot doing their job effectively. Similarly, the lives of people like Good, whether you agree with their politics or not, are in the hands of officers like Russ.

I could tolerate someone like Good being in my neighborhood. She’s dumb but I don’t think she’s dangerous. I would not feel comfortable flying on a plane with an incompetent pilot. And I would not feel comfortable with Russ in my neighborhood. He’s dangerous to the community, as he just showed.
 
News, flash, when you are fleeing an arrest from law enforcement, and you hit a police officer, or for that matter anyone, standing there, you might get shot.

It's best not to get yourself in those positions. There were many people on the sidewalks, simply standing there filming....far safer...

News flash: when you lead a violent group of rioters to our elected officials, you might get shot.

It’s best not to get yourself in those positions.
 
15th post
Try being consistent?
That doesn’t count because it goes against my argument”
Actually, debating the actions of Agent Ross, which you constantly refer to your exspurts as an approved source of knowledge, which is ok.......and it's your entire argument. As soon as someone brings up the obvious other side of the equation, which is Agent Ross, of course, you change the topic as talking about that part of the incident throws the basis of your argument out the window.
 
Correct, he did, and I answered your question. I agree, it did lead to people being discriminated against based on their race.

You seem to be fine with that, as we already discussed, and you confirmed.
So you shouldn't have any problem explaining how black folks having the same rights as whites caused them to be treated badly. AA, DEI, etc. was not a part of the CRA.
 
Actually, debating the actions of Agent Ross, which you constantly refer to your exspurts as an approved source of knowledge, which is ok.......and it's your entire argument. As soon as someone brings up the obvious other side of the equation, which is Agent Ross, of course, you change the topic as talking about that part of the incident throws the basis of your argument out the window.

And you ignore the perspective of the officer when it comes to Byrd.

Is it a good argument when you’re not even consistent about what you’re saying?
 
And you ignore the perspective of the officer when it comes to Byrd.

Is it a good argument when you’re not even consistent about what you’re saying?
There is no perspective unless he was involved in Minnesota.

You can't address what Ross was processing at the very moment everything happened..... it kills your one way argument.
 
Back
Top Bottom