QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
If the police aren't going to give someone a chance to comply with an order, what is the point of giving the order in the first place? Talk about stupid!You can’t be this stupid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the police aren't going to give someone a chance to comply with an order, what is the point of giving the order in the first place? Talk about stupid!You can’t be this stupid
So now you admit he was hit. Audio supports that.
She was ordered out of the car three times, ordered to stop several times.When a police officer gives an order to anyone that isn't involved in a serious crime, he or she always needs to give at least a minute of time for the person to comply with the order, before rushing to apprehend. They didn't give Good any time at all.
The ones that weren't involved or responding making split second decisions? Those exspurts?Take it up with the police experts who said exactly that.
Looked like a FAFO to me.Weird how you don’t consider it armchair QBing when it comes to Byrd
“Touched”? He was hit by it.No he didn’t.
Even your fellow MAGAs say that he was touched by the car as he was shooting.
Which took only a few seconds, all the while they were storming her car and obviously already set to arrest her. That is not a fair chance.She was ordered out of the car three times, ordered to stop several times.
Ok Jen.I said he was nudged, remember? Try to keep up.
Lol......what would be a fair chance, ordering her out of the car 35 times?Which took only a few seconds, all the while they were storming her car and obviously already set to arrest her. That is not a fair chance.
Ask her calmly to move and give her time to comply. SimpleLol......what would be a fair chance, ordering her out of the car 35 times?
They did.Ask her calmly to move and give her time to comply. Simple
Didn’t you people say that Byrd shouldn’t have shot Babbitt? Was that for you to decide? Were you looking at what he was looking at?
The ones that weren't involved or responding making split second decisions? Those exspurts?
Babbitt? I agree. She fucked around and she found out.Looked like a FAFO to me.
Ok Jen.
He was hit, you can paint it any color you want but he was hit.
Trying keeping it to the topic at hand.Try being consistent. You guys criticized Byrd despite not being involved and not responding to split-second decisions
Changes nothing. Audio says differently.Minor contact.
MAGA sure did. Lots of criticism against Byrd despite the fact that they weren’t there.I haven't mentioned a damn thing about Bryd nor Babbitt, because guess what, neither one of them were on the street in Minneapolis, nor do I have to pretend anything concerning them had a damn thing to do with what happened there.
What am I supposed to stop? I’m discussing a topic, same as you. Except I’m doing it without calling you names. Maybe you should try the same.So how about you just stop with the ******* political nonsense that will accomplish nothing more than possibly endangering the wellbeing of others, or at the least admit that you are nothing more than a political hack and an irresponsible asshat that really doesn't give a shit about anything worthwhile?
Changes nothing. Audio says differently.
Were they the there?Experts say he should have just moved.
Trying keeping it to the topic at hand.
I see you're spinning your wheels now because your argument isn't working as you hoped.
Were they the there?
So your position is exspurts are always right?I’m just showing how inconsistent you are. What you do with that is up to you.
Make up your mind on when it’s acceptable to criticize police action.