BREAKING VIDEO – Trump Says Chicago Is NEXT

At first, I was curious how President Trump could use the National Guard to temporarily “take over” the DC Police Department. But I quickly saw a post, on this Board, which pointed to a specific section of the DC Home Rule Act.

As to Chicago, obviously, that provision doesn’t apply. So I wondered what law (if any) would serve as a similar exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.

As it turns out, there is such a Congressionally passed law authorizing such an action (in support of the residents of Chicago). It is the Insurrection Act. Specifically:


One of the exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act is when the President determines that people are being deprived of constitutional rights, and state authorities cannot or will not protect them (10 U.S.C. § 253).

One may disagree with the possible “determination” likely to be made by President Trump in the case of Chicago. That’s neither here nor there, however. The authority exists as an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.

And crime stats there surely support such a determination.

And no, this does not mean that we are confronting the beginnings of fascism or the contention that our President “is” supposedly a “fascist.”

It means that common sense is asserting itself in the matter of working to secure the lives of the residents of Chicago.
 
He'll have more legal hoops to get through if he wants to go beyond DC, since outside of DC governors control their own state's National Guard units.
It would be nice however to see these black cities get cleaned up.
 
He'll have more legal hoops to get through if he wants to go beyond DC, since outside of DC governors control their own state's National Guard units.
It would be nice however to see these black cities get cleaned up.
Not if he makes use of 10 U.S.C. Section 253.
 
I voted for Obama twice.

In retrospect that was ill-advised - even downright stupid.

But let's not pretend the lawlessness, insanity, and woke delirium that the Dem party has descended into over the last decade even remotely resembles the party they were before Donald Trump forever broke their ******* brains.
Democrats have been anti-American way longer than just the past decade. This crap started with the McGovern campaign back in 1972. Been getting more extreme ever since.
Obama?? Twice???
 
He'll have more legal hoops to get through if he wants to go beyond DC, since outside of DC governors control their own state's National Guard units.
It would be nice however to see these black cities get cleaned up.
Federal Mission
  • Activation: The President can call the National Guard into federal service, which is known as federalization.

  • Command: When federalized, command and control shift to federal authorities.

  • Purpose: The Guard performs federal missions, including overseas deployments and combat operations.
The "Dual Status"
  • The National Guard's unique dual status allows it to function under state authority for local duties and under federal authority for national emergencies.

  • A specific duty status called "Title 32" is a hybrid that keeps the Guard under state command but is federally funded and can perform federal missions.
 
1755992562359.webp




 
Democrats have been anti-American way longer than just the past decade. This crap started with the McGovern campaign back in 1972. Been getting more extreme ever since.
Obama?? Twice???

I was a stupid youngun brainwashed by Left wing parents.

It's actually a positive I was able to man up and admit I was wrong.

And it certainly didn't help that - back then - REPUBLICANS SUCKED.

If I was forced to travel back in time right now, and pick between Dubya and John Kerry?

I wouldn't vote.

So there's that.
 
I was a stupid youngun brainwashed by Left wing parents.

It's actually a positive I was able to man up and admit I was wrong.

And it certainly didn't help that - back then - REPUBLICANS SUCKED.

If I was forced to travel back in time right now, and pick between Dubya and John Kerry?

I wouldn't vote.

So there's that.
But you still had a choice of the lesser of two evils. Democrats destroy American by design. First priority is to not vote democrat. Beyond that it’s all about pragmatism.
 
But you still had a choice of the lesser of two evils. Democrats destroy American by design. First priority is to not vote democrat. Beyond that it’s all about pragmatism.

Dubya and Cheney were not the lesser of two evils.

The Orwellian spy state they created would later be used by Obama and made even worse.

But without them, he couldn't have done it.

Trump became the nominee because in the Primaries he had the balls to challenge Bush and the neocons.

So without them and their pure evil, we wouldn't have Orange Man either.
 
Dubya and Cheney were not the lesser of two evils.

The Orwellian spy state they created would later be used by Obama and made even worse.

But without them, he couldn't have done it.

Trump became the nominee because in the Primaries he had the balls to challenge Bush and the neocons.

So without them and their pure evil, we wouldn't have Orange Man either.
Compound the worst of bush and Cheney with race, gender and sexuality fascism. Add a large dose of welfare state and shrunken economy and you have the alternative to bush/cheney.
 
Compound the worst of bush and Cheney with race, gender and sexuality fascism. Add a large dose of welfare state and shrunken economy and you have the alternative to bush/cheney.

I'm pretty sure you're the guy who said marijuana is intensely dangerous.

If not, I apologize.

But, suffice to say, despite broad agreement (and I confess to often enjoying your content) - we see the World very very differently.

In fact, after Biden?

I rate Bush the second worst President - even more so than Obama who I would rank third.

Sure, it's like picking the least stinky refuse.

But it's a distinction.
 
15th post
I'm pretty sure you're the guy who said marijuana is intensely dangerous.

If not, I apologize.

But, suffice to say, despite broad agreement (and I confess to often enjoying your content) - we see the World very very differently.

In fact, after Biden?

I rate Bush the second worst President - even more so than Obama who I would rank third.

Sure, it's like picking the least stinky refuse.

But it's a distinction.
Pot is intensely dangerous. Fact. Derealization disorder, various mental illnesses including psychosis and, of course, the physical ailment of cannabinoid hypermesis. I know several people with serious aversions to pot and for good reason. I didn’t believe that back between 1970 and 1975 until it happened to me. I eventually came across others with the same experience. Problem right now is that the pot industry has control of the messaging the same way democrats control media.
As for Bush… Bush saw gas prices drop like a rock once congress agreed to allow the drilling moratorium to expire in 2008. Obama immediately reversed that in 2009.
Bush did not focus politics in race terms but Obama dwelled on making all things about race. His own political essence is rooted in race.
Democrats are anti-American as policy. Regardless of how bad bush may have been, I don’t get how you can rate that above bush.
 
Democrats are anti-American as policy. Regardless of how bad bush may have been, I don’t get how you can rate that above bush.

The Democrats always sucked, and I failed to see it - it's true.

I was wrong, and I manned up and admitted it and voted for Trump twice.

(Should have all three times, but at least I woke up.)

But neither party remotely resembles what they did prior to say 2015 or so.

So comparing today's Democrat party to what they were back then, is apples and oranges.

Just like comparing the MAGA party vs. yesteryear's "GOP".

They may still have a generic "R" or "D" as labels, but that's surface level and deceptive.

But you don't have to agree with me, and I respect your opinion.

Agree to disagree brother. ;)
 
The Democrats always sucked, and I failed to see it - it's true.

I was wrong, and I manned up and admitted it and voted for Trump twice.

(Should have all three times, but at least I woke up.)

But neither party remotely resembles what they did prior to say 2015 or so.

So comparing today's Democrat party to what they were back then, is apples and oranges.

Just like comparing the MAGA party vs. yesteryear's "GOP".

They may still have a generic "R" or "D" as labels, but that's surface level and deceptive.

But you don't have to agree with me, and I respect your opinion.

Agree to disagree brother. ;)
The lines between the parties have blurred, no doubt, but it’s still very clear that the democrat party has been completely co-opted by Marxist/globalists. This is compounded by their control of American Pravda. This goes back way, way beyond 2015. More like 1972.
Many republicans are guilty through acquiescence and not policy. That is still a major distinction.
 
The lines between the parties have blurred, no doubt, but it’s still very clear that the democrat party has been completely co-opted by Marxist/globalists. This is compounded by their control of American Pravda. This goes back way, way beyond 2015. More like 1972.
Many republicans are guilty through acquiescence and not policy. That is still a major distinction.

Alright, I'll give you an example.

When Obama was President, he was labeled the "Deporter In Chief" for kicking out literally millions of illegals.

When he stole the White House manipulating his Biden puppet in 2020?

Well, we all know what happened to the border then.

MASSIVE difference.

I'm not saying that means Dems were great in 2008-2016 - they were awful.

But so was the GOP, and while Republicans are a true blue populist party now, the Dems have become profoundly worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom