Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Banned
- #21
Actually physical laws are not breakable, so if it was broken it was described in errorWow, nice display of ignorance. Try looking up the definition of Laws, theories and hypothesis as used in science. It is science we’re discussing here so those definitions apply.
Here, let me help. Live and learn.
“In general, a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. The explanation of a phenomenon is called a scientific theory. It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research.
"In science, laws are a starting place," said Peter Coppinger, an associate professor of biology and biomedical engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. "From there, scientists can then ask the questions, 'Why and how?'"”
What Is a Law in Science?
If the law was smashed it never existed.Obviously the law existed. It had to exist to be smashed. I think your confusion is a result of a misunderstanding of what science actually is. It is not a rigid body of knowledge cast in stone. It is an ongoing revelation fueled by expertise and technology subject to constant challenge and revision, hence my qualification of testable, verifiable (repeatable) and falsifiable. If if it cannot be subject to that kind of scrutiny, it is not science, it is hypothesis at best or idol dreaming at worst.
The only reason that a law can be smashed is because it never existedWhat I believe is that it’s an interesting and testable, verifiable and falsifiable hypothesis. An experiment to test it all has been designed and it is just a matter of developing the technology a bit more to catch up to the experimental design, I look forward to seeing the results. It’s exciting stuff, to me, getting to know the universe we inhabit.
Science is always restless if it’s good science. In my field, Abbe’s Law of Diffraction was the 800 lb gorilla in the room when it came to determining ultimate resolution of optical systems in microscopy. That held for over a century until Stefan Hell smashed the optical resolution barrier, rewrote Abbe’s equations and won a noble prize doing it. The truths science uncovers often depend on certain technology or tools to reveal them. So things change as we grow our smarts and technology.
So you believe that the universe and all the matter in it just popped into existence from nothing and that a degree is needed to claim this
LolThe only reason that a law can be smashed is because it never existedWhat I believe is that it’s an interesting and testable, verifiable and falsifiable hypothesis. An experiment to test it all has been designed and it is just a matter of developing the technology a bit more to catch up to the experimental design, I look forward to seeing the results. It’s exciting stuff, to me, getting to know the universe we inhabit.
Science is always restless if it’s good science. In my field, Abbe’s Law of Diffraction was the 800 lb gorilla in the room when it came to determining ultimate resolution of optical systems in microscopy. That held for over a century until Stefan Hell smashed the optical resolution barrier, rewrote Abbe’s equations and won a noble prize doing it. The truths science uncovers often depend on certain technology or tools to reveal them. So things change as we grow our smarts and technology.
So you believe that the universe and all the matter in it just popped into existence from nothing and that a degree is needed to claim this
Lol
Physical laws do not change, only human understanding changes
Jesus