Theory of everything (TOE), theory of gravity and Quantum Gravity (QG)

It is easy to notice that the presented concepts have some similarity to the concepts of Leonard Susskind, Gerardus 't Hooft (The Holographic Principle) and Lee Smolin (Loop quantum gravity).

Do they use magic fields as well ... you didn't answer my question ... what force are you relying on here for your microgrid? ...
 
you didn't answer my question ... what force are you relying on here for your microgrid? ...
Because this microgrid is space itself, it rests on nothing, or more precisely, on nothingness. Everything rests on it, and it rests on nothingness.
 
Do they use magic fields as well ... you didn't answer my question ... what force are you relying on here for your microgrid? ...
I have to apologize to ReinyDays, a first I thought he was a cool 37, now after checking and finding he is 19, when the dinosaurs......rambled.......more rambling........and now!........
 
Because this microgrid is space itself, it rests on nothing, or more precisely, on nothingness. Everything rests on it, and it rests on nothingness.
microgrid would cause friction and objects would slow down. the fact that a meter of our relativity is 8x10^14 light years to the outside universe, and that universe is vastly empty, and this continues infinitely outward, creates a sink for which things don't slow down when moving through space, they heat up instead.
 
Last edited:
Because this microgrid is space itself, it rests on nothing, or more precisely, on nothingness. Everything rests on it, and it rests on nothingness.

A microgrid is "something" ... but now you say it's "nothing" ... perhaps you should define this "nothingness" ... and how are you maintaining this microgrid without a natural force involved? ...

This sounds like QM, except QM relies on the electromagnetic force, for which we've already accounted for ... and gravity is smooth, won't form any sort of grid ... so what force are you relying on? ...

This is a basic question ... it shouldn't be this hard to answer ... if it's not a natural force, then it must be a supernatural force ... "good job, Fitz, good job" ...
 
microgrid would cause friction and objects would slow down. the fact that a meter of our relativity is 8x10^14 light years to the outside universe, and that universe is vastly empty, and this continues infinitely outward, creates a sink for which things don't slow down when moving through space, they heat up instead.
I fully agree.
so what force are you relying on? ...
I will only repeat that it doesn't rely on anything.
 
I fully agree.
Yes so it was when I equated aether density with heat and vice versa that I moved on from the grid. The infinite sink of the vast empty infinite big is met by the the infinite pressure and heat created by the atom. The atom, the earth like atom, with no electron, just a sphere with a core, is broken down into sphere/core levels that create infinite pressure to counter the sink. the aether is dark because it is a standing heat wave, moving across it is like heat moving past. Next time dilation.
 
For example, in Smolin's case the grid is asymmetrical, while in mine it is square.
 
So I present a picture of gravity in two dimensions.
 
Gravitons are closest to the nature of space.
 
The sizes of the squares of the microgrid of space are much smaller than the smallest particles.
 
The smallest particles are probably associated with the microgrid, although not to the same extent as the gravitons which are its bulges.
 
The smallest particles are probably associated with the microgrid, although not to the same extent as the gravitons which are its bulges.
there are problems with the grid. what if a block of grid is deformed? what happens to the rest of the grid?

I'm telling you density on the aether equals heat and vice versa, no need to map it out mathematically, the further you are from matter and gravity fields the colder, less dense aether. Gravity fields make up the aether. A gravity field creates density that would be like a continuous source of heat, it is a continuous source of heat, the heat in the core from the sun and movement cause the spin which converts that heat to kinetic energy, but also this heat creates a standing wave. Think of it like this the density raises the melting point of the material in the core, it isn't just residual heat from formation in the core, it is a flow of heat from the sun and movement through the aether, the higher melting point means the material heats up for longer until it reaches a point where it would radiate through spin of the atoms, if you take away this density by expanding the surface that creates it then the heat goes away, so the heat in the core expands into a standing wave field.
 
there are problems with the grid. what if a block of grid is deformed? what happens to the rest of the grid?
It is true that some problems may arise because I have not developed the microgrid concept so thoroughly.
 
The proposed microgrid has an interesting geometric shape.
 
15th post
The concept of flat space is perhaps surprising, and is a proposition, not a certainty.
 
There was already a concept of two-dimensional gravity, but it was completely different from the one I presented.
 
Back
Top Bottom