Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,050
- 25,594
- 2,173
They admitted those emails were fabrications. They could find no evidence to show they were actually written by Bernardo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They admitted those emails were fabrications. They could find no evidence to show they were actually written by Bernardo.
The evidence of this plan was a Russian intelligence report which contained fabricated emails.The email is with the DOJ. the link is the prior classified annex to a large report. Yes, if you read the report, under the heading it shows there was in fact a plan. On Page 17, that your thought said something different, makes clear there was in fact a plan
If you got to page 81 in the report itself, it goes into greater detail https://www.justice.gov/archives/media/1381211/dl
haha you lie, at no point did they say those particular emails were fabrications. In fact on page 17 of the annex they states INDEED, Smith's July 27 emails about Russia, Trump and NATO, the day after Clinton approved the plan, highlights there in fact was a plan.They admitted those emails were fabrications. They could find no evidence to show they were actually written by Bernardo.
No they didn't definitively.They admitted those emails were fabrications. They could find no evidence to show they were actually written by Bernardo.
Bernardo contacted by Durham in an ongoing investigation into Russian meddling denied writing the email.The evidence of this plan was a Russian intelligence report which contained fabricated emails.
This is what that email says:INDEED, Smith's July 27 emails about Russia, Trump and NATO, the day after Clinton approved the plan, highlights there in fact was a plan.
Durham said the most likely explanation is that the emails were concocted by the Russian intelligence.Bernardo contacted by Durham in an ongoing investigation into Russian meddling denied writing the email.
No shit?
There definitely was no definitive evidence they're real and that they thought they were most likely fabricated.No they didn't definitively.
right wingers are the kings of circle jerking, A box of saltines and a little spit is all they needYou made that claim up.
This thead is a right wing circle jerk about a BS story in a right wing trash post that tries to pretend that the evidence of Trump's disloyalty is manufactured by the right's current favorite International Jew, George Soros.
It, along with the rest of the Durham Report is BS.
Trump did collude with the Russians, and it is very very well documented. There was probably more to it than we actually know.
But not one word of the Mueller Report has ever been refuted, or even challenged.
Instead, the noise machine makes up these BS allegations, all tailored to appeal to the small parochial bigotry of the Trump base.
That is not definitive proof.Durham said the most likely explanation is that the emails were concocted by the Russian intelligence.
From the publicly released report or the newly found declassified info hidden in a burn bag? Why was it in a burn bag if it was public knowledge?This is what that email says:
There definitely was no definitive evidence they're real and that they thought they were most likely fabricated.
Even Durham who desperately wanted to pitch this story admitted it was the most likely explanation. You have nothing.That is not definitive proof.
It was actually in both. If anything, the annex that they just released makes the Clinton team look better since it shows the Russian report contained elements that were most likely fabrications.From the publicly released report or the newly found declassified info hidden in a burn bag? Why was it in a burn bag if it was public knowledge?
Fauci and Pizza Gate and shit![]()
Soros' alleged ties to Russiagate exposed in declassified annex of Durham report
The Senate Judiciary Committee released the declassified annex of former Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation, containing the underlying intelligence of the origins of the Trump–Russia probe.www.foxnews.com
You can learn alot from this article.
“The credible foreign sources indicating the FBI and the Obama administration would play a role in spreading the salacious Trump–Russia narrative — before the bureau ever launched its probe — were allegedly tied to George Soros' Open Society Foundation, according to an explosive document declassified Thursday morning.
The appendix to former Special Counsel John Durham’s report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee sheds stunning light on what Chairman Chuck Grassley describes as "one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history."
CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi worked in coordination to declassify the information.”
The framing of Trump as a Russian spy who colluded with Putin to rig the 2016 election is the biggest political scandal in history. This needs to NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN, IT IS DISGUSTING. Those involved attempted to disenfranchise EVERY TRUMP VOTER.
DEMOCRACY DIES WITH DEMOCRATS!
Even Durham who desperately wanted to pitch this story admitted it was the most likely explanation.
If anything, the annex that they just released makes the Clinton team look better since it shows the Russian report contained elements that were most likely fabrications.
**** man, Trump tried to tie the Kennedy assassination to Ted Cruz. You really going to go with this stupid narrative?
What do you think you “found out”?It's quite obvious you support what the left has been found out doing to stop Trump.
The plan was approved the day before. The email is a lieThis is what that email says:
We are writing to enlist your support for the attached public statement. Both of us are Hillary Clinton supporters and advisors but hope that this statement could be signed by a bipartisan group[.] Donald Trump's repeated denigration of the NA TO Alliance, his refusal to support our Article 5 obligations to our European allies and his kid glove treatment of Russia and Vladimir Putin are among the most reckless statements made by a Presidential candidate in rnemory.
Where the **** does the plan come from here?
According to who? The Russians that you trust so willingly?The plan was approved the day before.
Call it whatever you want but it doesn't talk about creating any hoaxes.The email is a lie
No it wasn’tThe evidence of this plan was a Russian intelligence report which contained fabricated emails.
Tsk tsk. You dupes fell for Russian disinformation again.
Oh right, you think it was an email that doesn't talk about any kind of plan or hoax whatsoever.No it wasn’t