BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

Obama should have been prosecuted over many things. His actions got people killed in Mexico.
OK.

MEXICO: News of another U.S. gun-tracking program stirs ...​

1719848959476.webp
Los Angeles Times
https://www.latimes.com › blogs › world-now › story
Oct 6, 2011 — Bush allowed guns to 'walk' across the border into Mexico during 2006 and 2007. Both undercover programs were intended to track guns bought ...
He completely dismissed the Constitutional rights of Al-Awlaki.
WTF?
Guess what?
Al-Awlaki was in a foreign country in a war zone.
Do you think the US Constitution follows you around the world?
 
Why? Or how about simply jail?

Here is what this ruling would have allowed.

Biden could have arrested Trump under the argument that as president it's his official job to protect the elections of the country and that Trump was undermining them.

If you think he could get away with that, then by all means, though if that were to happen, you’d essentially be legitimizing the alleged crimes that happened on J6
 
3 min ago

House majority leader hails Supreme Court immunity decision​

From CNN's Clare Foran
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise praised the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in a statement on Monday.
“With today’s decision, the Supreme Court concluded what we’ve known all along: a president cannot be prosecuted for his official acts. The weaponization of President Biden’s Department of Justice against President Trump is outrageous, unconstitutional, and must cease. While it’s becoming increasingly clear Democrats believe their only path to victory in November is through prosecuting their political opponent, today’s decision makes it clear this is not allowed in our constitutional system,” Scalise said.
 
Oh, I forgot to ask. Could you point to the section in the Constitution where it says Presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution?

Thanks, I'd like to review it.

WW
The constitution grants the president powers the rest of us do not enjoy.... official duty is all the court said today... this ends Smith's case or in the least it pushes it way past the election when we will have new leadership at the DOJ...
Its over....
 
8 min ago

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer decries immunity ruling as other Democrats echo his concerns​

From CNN's Owen Dahlkamp and Morgan Rimmer
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer looks on during a news conference on June 5 in Washington, DC.
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer condemned the majority’s ruling, calling it “a sad day for our democracy.”
The New York Democrat also said “the very basis of our judicial system is that no one is above the law. Treason or incitement of an insurrection should not be considered a core constitutional power afforded to a president.”
Other congressional Democrats have also expressed outrage over the decision.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, dubbed the ruling as “disastrous,” blaming an “extreme right-wing Supreme Court” for drastically weakening “accountability if a president attempts to use their office for criminal purposes.”
Rep. Frederica Wilson of Texas criticized the court, accusing them of not upholding the tenant of “equal justice under law.” She also highlighted that three Trump-appointed justices sided with the former president in the ruling.
 
OK.

MEXICO: News of another U.S. gun-tracking program stirs ...

View attachment 969987
Los Angeles Times
https://www.latimes.com › blogs › world-now › story
Oct 6, 2011 — Bush allowed guns to 'walk' across the border into Mexico during 2006 and 2007. Both undercover programs were intended to track guns bought ...

OK, so both should have been prosecuted.


WTF?
Guess what?
Al-Awlaki was in a foreign country in a war zone.
Do you think the US Constitution follows you around the world?

There is a specific law addressing this. It's illegal for anyone else. Yes, as a citizen your rights follow you.
 
3 min ago

House majority leader hails Supreme Court immunity decision​

From CNN's Clare Foran
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise praised the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in a statement on Monday.
“With today’s decision, the Supreme Court concluded what we’ve known all along: a president cannot be prosecuted for his official acts. The weaponization of President Biden’s Department of Justice against President Trump is outrageous, unconstitutional, and must cease. While it’s becoming increasingly clear Democrats believe their only path to victory in November is through prosecuting their political opponent, today’s decision makes it clear this is not allowed in our constitutional system,” Scalise said.
Looks like Biden, via Kamala, gets to re-elect himself.
 
I have to note the hypocrisy. The court over ruled RvW because they said no such protection exists in the Constitution.

Now they rule a president has certain protections despite there being nothing about that in the Constitution.
/—-/ And that is the role of the USSC, to interpret the Constitution.
 
OK, so both should have been prosecuted.




There is a specific law addressing this. It's illegal for anyone else. Yes, as a citizen your rights follow you.
Really?
What "Law"?

Better tell the Kremlin.


President of Russia (@KremlinRussia_E) / ...​

1719849437020.webp
X · KremlinRussia_E
1.9M+ followers
Official Kremlin news Official Telegram channel: Kremlin. News.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom