BREAKING: President Trump Shares Photos Of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Gang Tattoos

Folks, we're in big trouble.

I've always known and said Trump is an idiot. But he is an even bigger idiot than I thought.

Trump actually bleevs the superimposed M S 1 3 on the photograph he was holding are actual tattoos.

Any idiot can see those were Photoshopped or Painted onto the photo of Garcia's hand to gaslight Trump into bleeving the actual tattoos represent MS13.

Trump thought those Photoshopped identifiers were the actual tattoos!

Our country has a retard at the reins.

Okay, Kreskin.

Got any more Stupid Democrat tricks you'd like to share with us today?
 
Sweet...........but that didn't answer my original question.

Yes it does answer the question.
It is most certainly doctored.
It would be impossible for all the MS-13 letter to line up vertically so perfectly if they were actual tattoos.
 
So what proof do you have that that photo is not photoshopped?
I am going off your post of a left wing clown that could only claim the photo he saw was “ maybe” photoshopped.
I realize that I am questioning one of the democrat parties saints. I also realize that he is a little farther down the ladder then saint Floyd because he is still alive.
Had this guy been sent to China (the holy land of democrats) he would be envied.
All that being said if your article could not be sure if the image was photoshopped or not with all the money and other people that could do proper research behind him why should anyone believe you when you yell that it was photoshopped? How many people have you hired to check on his tattoos? How many experts have you paid to digitally check the evednce?

There are dozens of images of Kilmar without the MS-13 tattoo, and only one with it.
And the one with it, shows all the evidence of being fake, since the letters are too dark, distinct, and perfectly vertical.
 
A man with dementia knows a mother whose child was killed by an illegal alien gang member is a sympathetic figure, while a wife beating illegal alien gang member is not.

Dementia guy knows, but Democrats don't.

Wrong.
There is zero evidence that Kilmar is a gang member since he came to the US at 15.
And even if he was a gang member, that does not change his legal rights to a hearing.
And there is no evidence of him being a "wife beater".
They had a domestic dispute that scared her, but she rescinded her protection order.
The law cannot change based on whether or not one is or was a "gang member".
 
Wrong.
There is zero evidence that Kilmar is a gang member since he came to the US at 15.
There is evidence from multiple sources. It has been posted several times on this thread.

you can argue that the evidence is weak, or at least not strong enough to send a man to prison, but to say that there is zero evidence is a flat lie.
And even if he was a gang member, that does not change his legal rights to a hearing.
Which he had more than one of.
And there is no evidence of him being a "wife beater".
They had a domestic dispute that scared her, but she rescinded her protection order.
I scared her so much that she lied?

Have you read her court filing? Or do you close your eyes to evidence and then say there isn't any sense you don't see it?

Are you seriously accusing an abused wife of lying? Or are all women who seek court protection from men who beat them just being irrational and probably having their monthlies?

Sad. Democrats don't even pretend to care about women anymore.
The law cannot change based on whether or not one is or was a "gang member".
Immigration law allows gang members to be rejected by immigration officers under expedited removal. Merely entering the country illegally is indeed grounds for deportation. As much as democrats, hate that fact.

A very good thing that finally happened.
 
Last edited:
There are dozens of images of Kilmar without the MS-13 tattoo, and only one with it.
And the one with it, shows all the evidence of being fake, since the letters are too dark, distinct, and perfectly vertical.
I am going off the article posted by the op. Where a reporter claims it MAYBE photoshopped. If the reporter with other journalists, probably access to experts with knowledge of photo manipulation and even past photo archives is unable to make a claim in certainty then I am not willing to take the assertions of someone on the internet who has access to none of those and has a political axe to grind.
 
I am going off the article posted by the op. Where a reporter claims it MAYBE photoshopped. If the reporter with other journalists, probably access to experts with knowledge of photo manipulation and even past photo archives is unable to make a claim in certainty then I am not willing to take the assertions of someone on the internet who has access to none of those and has a political axe to grind.
Are you honestly telling me you can’t figure out it’s a photoshop by looking at it?

 
Here we have an EXPERT saying the tattoo is definitely MS-13 and dolts on the internet know more than him.

 
15th post
I am saying that if you have a large number of resources behind you and you can not tell then anyone else is only allowing their own bias to influence them.
Everyone can tell, except those who are so entrenched in MAGA cult that they've convinced themselves otherwise. And even then, they'll just say they don't know.
 
Everyone can tell, except those who are so entrenched in MAGA cult that they've convinced themselves otherwise. And even then, they'll just say they don't know.
Yet you are somehow not explaining that it was not done as a visual aid to explain what the tattoos are meant to represent. You are claiming to be more intelligent than the fellow who wrote the article with a number of resources behind him that were unable to determine that it was. Look I get it. In your mind Trump and everyone that does not hate him are the worst in the world. The problem is you are a smaller minority then you really want to believe
 
Back
Top Bottom