BREAKING!! Michael Mann.....climate criminal?

[skookerasbil]

More on the bogusness of a "consensus" >>>

Global Warming Or Global Fraud



When you desire total control, you have to come up with a whopper!!

 

[tinydancer]

Delingpole gets Breitbart Britain, Mann gets fucked over.............yayayayayay!

life is good.

 

[tinydancer]

I love delingpole to death. I am so so glad he is out there

 

[skookerasbil]

Over 9,000 US PHd Scientists call BS on "consensus" >>>>

Global Warming Petition Project



Of course, to the k00ks, they are fake scientists!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

IPCC Researchers admit global warming fraud >>>>


IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud



conveniently ignored by the AGW nutters.

 

[skookerasbil]

The US Congress found Mann's work to be fraudulent >>>>>


M&M Project Page



The AGW k00ks post up their old tired nonsense and don't want people knowing that there is hardly a "consensus".

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[Abraham3]

So, have you admitted that your Principia Scientific post contending that Mann's lawsuit had failed and that he had gone bankrupt was nothing more than a collection of lies?

If not, why not?

Are you going to use Principia Scientific as a reference in the future? Do you have any comment to make about John Sullivan's psychopathic lying and likely paedophilic tendencies?

If not, why not?

 

[flacaltenn]

So F-ing WHAT? The MWP was not caused by human GHG emissions. The MWP's temperature did not rise 1C in 100 years.

You have no way of knowing that it didn't...
Ask Marcott..
The Wood Hole folks ain't buying no hockey sticks either...

 

[skookerasbil]

So, have you admitted that your Principia Scientific post contending that Mann's lawsuit had failed and that he had gone bankrupt was nothing more than a collection of lies?

If not, why not?

Are you going to use Principia Scientific as a reference in the future? Do you have any comment to make about John Sullivan's psychopathic lying and likely paedophilic tendencies?

If not, why not?

Case is still on s0n!! Looks to most that Mann is the fraudster and I just popped up 4 links of pwn on the BS that is the hockey stick.


There is a difference between SSDD, me and the other truth tellers compared to you and the nutter-ass climate contingent. You'd take a swan dive off a 100 foot cliff if the religion told you to. We don't tend to hysteria or naïve. We think the idea of proof when you're talking science is probably a good idea. Not the religion though........they see a hailstorm on the TV and go diving for cover looking for the latest breaking from the bought science guru's. Because if they didn't get their fix, they'd have to blow their own brains out. Its a permanent tragic cycle for your goofballs.......permanent. You MUST find support to perpetuate the fraud or you go to the box looing and feeling like a cheap rodeo clown.



By the way >>> http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/313851-more-proof-the-skeptics-are-winning.html

 

[Old Rocks]

Over 9,000 US PHd Scientists call BS on "consensus" >>>>

Global Warming Petition Project



Of course, to the k00ks, they are fake scientists!!!

Over 31,000 scientists signed the OISM Petition Project

32,000 Sounds Like A Lot
In fact, OISM signatories represent a tiny fraction (~0.3%) of all US science graduates (petition cards were only sent to individuals within the U.S)

According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science graduates have gained qualifications consistent with the OISM polling criteria since the 1970-71 school year. 32,000 out of 10 million is not a very compelling figure, but a tiny minority - approximately 0.3 per cent.

There are many issues casting doubt on the validity of this petition. On investigation, attempts to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change often appear to have ideological roots, vested business interests or political sponsors. The claims made for the OISM petition do not withstand objective scrutiny, and the assertions made in the petition are not supported by evidence, data or scientific research.

Several studies conducted independently (Oreskes 2004, Oreskes 2007, Doran and Zimmerman (2009), Anderegg et al. (2010), Cook et. al., 2013) have shown that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing the climate to change, and that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are causing global changes to the climate. These views form the scientific consensus on climate change.

 

[flacaltenn]

Quoting "Cook et al, 2013" just gets you laughed at GoldiRocks..

 

[mamooth]

I love delingpole to death. I am so so glad he is out there

Given his only talent is snivelling out "libtard!" in tourette-syndrome fashion, I can see why you'd be a big fan.

 

[Abraham3]

Quoting "Cook et al, 2013" just gets you laughed at GoldiRocks..

Why? There work backs up work by Oreskes, Bray, Von Storch, Mumpower, Reagan-Cirincione, Gallup Polling, Harris Interactive, Doran, Zimmerman, Anderegg, Prall, Harold, Schneider, Farnsworrth, Lichter, Lefsrud and Meyer.*

WTF have YOU got?


* - Surveys of scientists' views on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[mamooth]

This just in: America still has that free speech thingamajig.

Despite your best efforts, yes. After all, the denialists here are the ones literally demanding jail for a scientist because he did science that doesn't agree with their political party. Denialists are shockingly similar to the Lysenkoists of the old Soviet Union. Lysenkoism was crap pseudoscience genetics, but it had the official approval of TheParty, so it was either embrace it or go to jail. And just like the Lysenkoists, you denialists fabricate stories about how the offending scientists are actually criminals and EnemiesOfTheState.

Besides that, what makes you think the chances that Mann turns over the metadata for inspection in America, are any better than in Canada?

He did turn it over, long ago.

We keep trying to tell you that your kiddie-fiddler source simply made up a crazy story. Alas, your cult says you are not allowed to believe that, hence you won't.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

This just in: America still has that free speech thingamajig.

Despite your best efforts, yes. After all, the denialists here are the ones literally demanding jail for a scientist because he did science that doesn't agree with their political party. Denialists are shockingly similar to the Lysenkoists of the old Soviet Union. Lysenkoism was crap pseudoscience genetics, but it had the official approval of TheParty, so it was either embrace it or go to jail. And just like the Lysenkoists, you denialists fabricate stories about how the offending scientists are actually criminals and EnemiesOfTheState.

Besides that, what makes you think the chances that Mann turns over the metadata for inspection in America, are any better than in Canada?

He did turn it over, long ago.

We keep trying to tell you that your kiddie-fiddler source simply made up a crazy story. Alas, your cult says you are not allowed to admit that, hence you won't.

Just as long as you stay away from Marpi Point, O.K.?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, have you admitted that your Principia Scientific post contending that Mann's lawsuit had failed and that he had gone bankrupt was nothing more than a collection of lies?

If not, why not?

Are you going to use Principia Scientific as a reference in the future? Do you have any comment to make about John Sullivan's psychopathic lying and likely paedophilic tendencies?

If not, why not?

Mann's all done. Nothing left but the Orange prison Jumpsuit

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Over 9,000 US PHd Scientists call BS on "consensus" >>>>

Global Warming Petition Project



Of course, to the k00ks, they are fake scientists!!!

Over 31,000 scientists signed the OISM Petition Project

32,000 Sounds Like A Lot
In fact, OISM signatories represent a tiny fraction (~0.3%) of all US science graduates (petition cards were only sent to individuals within the U.S)

According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science graduates have gained qualifications consistent with the OISM polling criteria since the 1970-71 school year. 32,000 out of 10 million is not a very compelling figure, but a tiny minority - approximately 0.3 per cent.

There are many issues casting doubt on the validity of this petition. On investigation, attempts to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change often appear to have ideological roots, vested business interests or political sponsors. The claims made for the OISM petition do not withstand objective scrutiny, and the assertions made in the petition are not supported by evidence, data or scientific research.

Several studies conducted independently (Oreskes 2004, Oreskes 2007, Doran and Zimmerman (2009), Anderegg et al. (2010), Cook et. al., 2013) have shown that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing the climate to change, and that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are causing global changes to the climate. These views form the scientific consensus on climate change.

Climate "science", the only science done by "Consensus"

 

[tinydancer]

No doubt great news for Mark Steyn and NRO.

OMG I love that avie. First thing that happened I put my hand on my hip!

 

[tinydancer]

Steyn by the way is killing Mann. YAY!