CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,629
- 71,938
- 2,330
Mann: "Tree rings? No I said Three Rings. The Secret to Global Warming is in the Three Rings"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Refute Old Rocks reference.
Research on global warming is FILLLED with hockey stick graphs because that IS what global temperature has done.
The claim that the whole thing pivots on the magnitude of the MWP is pure bullshit. If you want to dispute Mann, find some quality temperature data that doesn't show a precipitous rise in the 20th century.
Refute Old Rocks reference.
Research on global warming is FILLLED with hockey stick graphs because that IS what global temperature has done.
The claim that the whole thing pivots on the magnitude of the MWP is pure bullshit. If you want to dispute Mann, find some quality temperature data that doesn't show a precipitous rise in the 20th century.
New Temperature Reconstruction from Indo-Pacific Warm Pool : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
A new 2,000-year-long reconstruction of sea surface temperatures (SST) from the Indo-Pacific warm pool (IPWP) suggests that temperatures in the region may have been as warm during the Medieval Warm Period as they are today.
The IPWP is the largest body of warm water in the world, and, as a result, it is the largest source of heat and moisture to the global atmosphere, and an important component of the planets climate. Climate models suggest that global mean temperatures are particularly sensitive to sea surface temperatures in the IPWP. Understanding the past history of the region is of great importance for placing current warming trends in a global context.
The study is published in the journal Nature.
Temperature reconstructions suggest that the Northern Hemisphere may have been slightly cooler (by about 0.5 degrees Celsius) during the 'Medieval Warm Period' (~AD 800-1300) than during the late-20th century. However, these temperature reconstructions are based on, in large part, data compiled from high latitude or high altitude terrestrial proxy records, such as tree rings and ice cores, from the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Little pre-historical temperature data from tropical regions like the IPWP has been incorporated into these analyses, and the global extent of warm temperatures during this interval is unclear. As a result, conclusions regarding past global temperatures still have some uncertainties.
Oppo comments, Although there are significant uncertainties with our own reconstruction, our work raises the idea that perhaps even the Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstructions need to be looked at more closely.
Oppo cautions that the reconstruction contains some uncertainties. Information from three different cores was compiled in order to reconstruct a 2,000-year-long record. In addition sediment data have an inherent uncertainty associated with accurately dating samples
New Temperature Reconstruction from Indo-Pacific Warm Pool : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Water temperature during the late Medieval Warm Period, between about A.D. 1000 to 1250, was within error of modern annual sea surface temperatures. (Oppo, Rosenthal, Linsley; 2009)
And the usual flap-yap unreferanced and unlinked idiocy goes on.
Earth's Temp is Rising Fast | Climate Weather | LiveScience
However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.
The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES (Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.
This just in: America still has that free speech thingamajig.Things can get confusing because there are two libel cases. Mann vs. Ball in Canada, and Mann vs. NR/CEI/Steyn in the USA. Steyn has made his answer and counterclaim.
http://www.steynonline.com/documents/6109.pdf
This part of Steyn's motion made me laugh.
---
111.
Denies the allegations in Paragraph One-Hundred-And-
Eleven of the Amended Complaint, and feels Plaintiff is
going round like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a
wheel, like the circles that you find in the tree-rings of
your mind.
---
Unfortunately for Steyn, judges tend to view joke motions not in a favorable light. Steyn is representing himself, and he who represents himself has a fool for a client. For example, a lawyer would have told Steyn not to do this:
---
25.
Denies the allegations in Paragraph Twenty-Five of the
Amended Complaint, except admits that there was an
investigation by former FBI Director Freeh concluding that
Penn State and its highest officers had helped cover up the
serial child rape perpetrated by Dr Mann’s colleague Jerry
Sandusky.
---
When one of the reasons you're in trouble is for associating Mann with Sandusky, deliberately doing it again in your motion is not such a hot idea.
So F-ing WHAT? The MWP was not caused by human GHG emissions. The MWP's temperature did not rise 1C in 100 years.
I think real scientists have finally had enough of the AGWCult and will start to boot them to the curb next to Ghostbusters
So F-ing WHAT? The MWP was not caused by human GHG emissions. The MWP's temperature did not rise 1C in 100 years.
Neither have present temperatures....more than half is due to data manipulation.
Things can get confusing because there are two libel cases. Mann vs. Ball in Canada, and Mann vs. NR/CEI/Steyn in the USA. Steyn has made his answer and counterclaim.
http://www.steynonline.com/documents/6109.pdf
This part of Steyn's motion made me laugh.
---
111.
Denies the allegations in Paragraph One-Hundred-And-
Eleven of the Amended Complaint, and feels Plaintiff is
going round like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a
wheel, like the circles that you find in the tree-rings of
your mind.
---
Unfortunately for Steyn, judges tend to view joke motions not in a favorable light. Steyn is representing himself, and he who represents himself has a fool for a client. For example, a lawyer would have told Steyn not to do this:
---
25.
Denies the allegations in Paragraph Twenty-Five of the
Amended Complaint, except admits that there was an
investigation by former FBI Director Freeh concluding that
Penn State and its highest officers had helped cover up the
serial child rape perpetrated by Dr Manns colleague Jerry
Sandusky.
---
When one of the reasons you're in trouble is for associating Mann with Sandusky, deliberately doing it again in your motion is not such a hot idea.
I think real scientists have finally had enough of the AGWCult and will start to boot them to the curb next to Ghostbusters
What real scientists? Show us ANY evidence that even suggests significant numbers of climate scientists are abandoning AGW. ANY.
Your broken BS meters are what allowed you to get sucked into the denialist cult. Scammers and criminals also notice how your BS meters are non-functional, hence they rightfully see you as easy marks.
So F-ing WHAT? The MWP was not caused by human GHG emissions. The MWP's temperature did not rise 1C in 100 years.
Neither have present temperatures....more than half is due to data manipulation.
Let's see some actual EVIDENCE that GLOBAL temperature records were adjusted without valid cause and only in order to emphasize the warming signal. You have NOT yet presented any such thing.
I think real scientists have finally had enough of the AGWCult and will start to boot them to the curb next to Ghostbusters
What real scientists? Show us ANY evidence that even suggests significant numbers of climate scientists are abandoning AGW. ANY.