Breaking! Loretta Lynch Turns Against And Torches James Comey----Releases Official Statement

[Steve_McGarrett]

Gateway Pundit is a charter member of FARM (Fake Alt Right Media) and is very, very biased against facts.

False! Gateway Pundit is a prestigious member of the White House Press Pool due to their ethical accurate reporting of the facts.

 

[jc456]

Gateway Pundit is a charter member of FARM (Fake Alt Right Media) and is very, very biased against facts.

False! Gateway Pundit is a prestigious member of the White House Press Pool due to their ethical accurate reporting of the facts.

dude any media source that reports opposing news, are low life to these punks. Just remember and let it roll off your back. fk em.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, it is a member of FARM.

 

[Syriusly]

Aren't you.people exited about this? The deep state coup players are turning against one another ratting each other out. They know the gig is up.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ore-highly-anticipated-james-comey-interview/

Sure- I don't mind Lynch being on record refuting the Republican BS

In her statement Sunday, Lynch said: "At no time did I ever discuss any aspect of the investigation with anyone from the Clinton campaign or the DNC."
In the book, Comey also says Lynch asked him to call the Clinton email probe "a matter" instead of an investigation, which to him seemed to align with the Clinton campaigns use of euphemisms to avoid using the word "investigation," he wrote.
In her statement, Lynch defended her approach, saying that in her decades as a federal prosecutor, "I have never hesitated to make the hard decisions, guided by the Department of Justice's core principles of integrity, independence and above all, always doing the right thing.
"The Justice Department's handling of the Clinton email investigation under my leadership was no exception," she said. "It was led by a team of non-partisan career prosecutors whose integrity cannot be overstated and whom I trusted to assess the facts and make a recommendation -- one that I ultimately accepted because I thought the evidence and law warranted it."
Lynch, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, told NBC News last week that Comey didn't appear concerned by the decision to call Clinton investigation a "matter," saying that meeting was "like any other we had where we talked about the issues. We had a full and open discussion about it," and Comey never raised concerns.

I’m sure that explains the necessity of a private tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton, where Comey soon after changed the nature of the investigation. I do believe Coney was the first to put Mrs. Lynch under the bus on this. Who had the greater authority between the two? Loretta Lynch is just trying to save face as she waiting until James Comey came forward, to agree to make a statement.

Comey: Then-Atty. Gen. Lynch urged that the Hillary Clinton email probe be called a 'matter,' not 'investigation'

I love how you right wingers get your panties in a knot about Lynch asking Comey to refer to the Trey Gowdy’s email witch hunt as a “matter”.

Did she ask him to deny Clinton was under investigation? No.

Did she ask him to drop the Investigation? No.

Did she ask him to “go easy” on Hillary? No.

Such is the extent of your desperation to find something shady about this discussion that you keep trying to portray this as sinister.

But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy.

Bears quoting:
But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy

You nailed it.

none of that is true. If it were we'd know it by now don't you think? What does that have to do with Loretta telling Comey to adjust his talking points? that isn't obstruction? LOL selective judgement I see.

What part isn't true?

Trump asking for Comey for his personal loyalty?
Trump asking Comey to let Flynn go?
Firing Comey for the Russia investigation?

Please do tell.

 

[jc456]

Sure- I don't mind Lynch being on record refuting the Republican BS

In her statement Sunday, Lynch said: "At no time did I ever discuss any aspect of the investigation with anyone from the Clinton campaign or the DNC."
In the book, Comey also says Lynch asked him to call the Clinton email probe "a matter" instead of an investigation, which to him seemed to align with the Clinton campaigns use of euphemisms to avoid using the word "investigation," he wrote.
In her statement, Lynch defended her approach, saying that in her decades as a federal prosecutor, "I have never hesitated to make the hard decisions, guided by the Department of Justice's core principles of integrity, independence and above all, always doing the right thing.
"The Justice Department's handling of the Clinton email investigation under my leadership was no exception," she said. "It was led by a team of non-partisan career prosecutors whose integrity cannot be overstated and whom I trusted to assess the facts and make a recommendation -- one that I ultimately accepted because I thought the evidence and law warranted it."
Lynch, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, told NBC News last week that Comey didn't appear concerned by the decision to call Clinton investigation a "matter," saying that meeting was "like any other we had where we talked about the issues. We had a full and open discussion about it," and Comey never raised concerns.

I’m sure that explains the necessity of a private tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton, where Comey soon after changed the nature of the investigation. I do believe Coney was the first to put Mrs. Lynch under the bus on this. Who had the greater authority between the two? Loretta Lynch is just trying to save face as she waiting until James Comey came forward, to agree to make a statement.

Comey: Then-Atty. Gen. Lynch urged that the Hillary Clinton email probe be called a 'matter,' not 'investigation'

I love how you right wingers get your panties in a knot about Lynch asking Comey to refer to the Trey Gowdy’s email witch hunt as a “matter”.

Did she ask him to deny Clinton was under investigation? No.

Did she ask him to drop the Investigation? No.

Did she ask him to “go easy” on Hillary? No.

Such is the extent of your desperation to find something shady about this discussion that you keep trying to portray this as sinister.

But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy.

Bears quoting:
But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy

You nailed it.

none of that is true. If it were we'd know it by now don't you think? What does that have to do with Loretta telling Comey to adjust his talking points? that isn't obstruction? LOL selective judgement I see.

What part isn't true?

Trump asking for Comey for his personal loyalty?
Trump asking Comey to let Flynn go?
Firing Comey for the Russia investigation?

Please do tell.

none of it was true. I thought I made that quite clear. but it's you so I get it. you need it answered twice.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

I’m sure that explains the necessity of a private tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton, where Comey soon after changed the nature of the investigation. I do believe Coney was the first to put Mrs. Lynch under the bus on this. Who had the greater authority between the two? Loretta Lynch is just trying to save face as she waiting until James Comey came forward, to agree to make a statement.

Comey: Then-Atty. Gen. Lynch urged that the Hillary Clinton email probe be called a 'matter,' not 'investigation'

I love how you right wingers get your panties in a knot about Lynch asking Comey to refer to the Trey Gowdy’s email witch hunt as a “matter”.

Did she ask him to deny Clinton was under investigation? No.

Did she ask him to drop the Investigation? No.

Did she ask him to “go easy” on Hillary? No.

Such is the extent of your desperation to find something shady about this discussion that you keep trying to portray this as sinister.

But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy.

Bears quoting:
But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy

You nailed it.

none of that is true. If it were we'd know it by now don't you think? What does that have to do with Loretta telling Comey to adjust his talking points? that isn't obstruction? LOL selective judgement I see.

What part isn't true?

Trump asking for Comey for his personal loyalty?
Trump asking Comey to let Flynn go?
Firing Comey for the Russia investigation?

Please do tell.

none of it was true. I thought I made that quite clear. but it's you so I get it. you need it answered twice.

Just to let you know, the poster Syriusly is a foreigner. I've dealt with him before over the years with his communist Fogbow friends.

 

[oreo]

Notice she didn't say she didn't discuss the investigation with wild willie on the tarmac. I guess that was a bridge too far. LMAO


.

There's a lot of people that want James Comey torched--not only Republicans but Democrats too. His name is "Mudd" on both sides of the isle. He is the most incompetent--abohorrent FBI director in this nations history. He broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions over the Clinton email investigation, was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol, and made a decision by himself to do it anyway. During all these interviews, he makes no apologies for it, but makes excuses.

Comey states: "I must have thought at the time, since Hillary Clinton was so far ahead in the polls, I would reopen the investigation, just so I could clear her again, so she wouldn't be known as an illegitimate President once she was elected, and the news broke that there were more emails on Anthony Wieners computer. That's basically his excuse for violating the Hatch Act in the Constitution. DOJ protocol specifically states to not release any information within 60 days of an election. Comey did it within 11 days. During that time millions of Americans voted believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, and 7 days later Comey gave birth to a nothing burger.

Asked if he would make the same decision again, his answer is yes. Comey even used a Russian alterted document to attack Hillary Clinton with. When Lyndsey Graham found out about that, he had a conniption fit right on the senate floor.
'None of it makes much sense': Experts are baffled by Comey's use of a fake Russian document to skirt the DOJ
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey's 'breach of protocol'
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

Rod Rosenstein wrote a very critical report over that, which is what Trump originally gave for firing Comey. But no one believed that story-- which basically was that Trump fired Comey in order to protect Hillary Clinton--

So Trump got on National T.V. and ended up admitting that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation.



Trump was right to fire Comey--there is no doubt about it. The problem is he should have done it as soon as he walked into the Oval office, and not waited until after the Russian investigation was in the news. The only gratification I got was how Comey was fired. While he was giving a speech to surrogates in San Francisco--he got to read about his firing off of a ticker tape---

I will not buy James Comey's book to help with him with his retirement plans. I will not read about his loyalty to this country, when he can't even follow standard DOJ protocol. Comey has an ego that matches Trump's. They both think they're KINGS, and can do anything they want without any reprocussions.

There's a much better book out there anyway.

top seller on Amazon today. Very well written, easy to follow, hard to put down. Verified by credible trusted news sources and their reporting over the last year. Reads like a nonfiction spy novel.

All that spam and not one mention of the thread topic. How much are you paid to spam the board with all the crap?

so the thread is about loretta and Comey going at each other for the most part. the left came in here to shut the thread down by trolling the thread with off topic crap. Shame the mods aren't following along.

There's nothing I stated that isn't true in post # 39. Do you believe that Loretta Lynch had a love affair going on with Comey--when he used an altered russian email to skirt around her authority and jump out in front of congress to give a damming speech about Hillary Clinton? Do you believe that she appreciated the fact that he broke long standing DOJ protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, (after she warned him not to do that) and he did it anyway. She was the one that filed a DOJ complaint on Comey. In fact, if Trump hadn't of fired him, he would still be under investigation for his interference into the election. He used Loretta Lynch's name once or twice to defend what he did, now he has flip flopped on that in his book.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election
'None of it makes much sense': Experts are baffled by Comey's use of a fake Russian document to skirt the DOJ

So Hell Yeah Loretta Lynch is going to go out on the offensive of James Comey. She was his BOSS.

I wonder if now, in (rhetrospect) if Trump primary voters would have appreciated knowing about Trump's inner circle being in continual contact with Russian intelligence agents since 2015? Comey didn't have any problems talking about emails, & he had all this information coming in from Foreign intelligence agencies since 2015.---
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

What we had was a rogue FBI director--that broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions to make a name for himself. That's all he was about. Maybe he was eyeing the Presidency--but he has ended up being fired, and in the process he had a major hand in getting elected the most incompetent, corrupt President in this nation's history, whom he is now going to take down.



Comey should be writing this book in a prison cell as far as I am concerned.

There's a much better book out.

I thought the boss was supposed to just sit back and take the abuse. Isn't that what you all are saying on Trump talking back at comey. which is it? does the boss have a right or not?

I don't give a rats ass what Comey says about Trump and what Trump says about Comey---that has nothing to do with anything.

The point is Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of Justice, which is an impeachable offense, and the dumbass got on National T.V. and admitted to it. The President is held under the same laws as any other citizen in this country.

 

[jc456]

There's a lot of people that want James Comey torched--not only Republicans but Democrats too. His name is "Mudd" on both sides of the isle. He is the most incompetent--abohorrent FBI director in this nations history. He broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions over the Clinton email investigation, was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol, and made a decision by himself to do it anyway. During all these interviews, he makes no apologies for it, but makes excuses.

Comey states: "I must have thought at the time, since Hillary Clinton was so far ahead in the polls, I would reopen the investigation, just so I could clear her again, so she wouldn't be known as an illegitimate President once she was elected, and the news broke that there were more emails on Anthony Wieners computer. That's basically his excuse for violating the Hatch Act in the Constitution. DOJ protocol specifically states to not release any information within 60 days of an election. Comey did it within 11 days. During that time millions of Americans voted believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, and 7 days later Comey gave birth to a nothing burger.

Asked if he would make the same decision again, his answer is yes. Comey even used a Russian alterted document to attack Hillary Clinton with. When Lyndsey Graham found out about that, he had a conniption fit right on the senate floor.
'None of it makes much sense': Experts are baffled by Comey's use of a fake Russian document to skirt the DOJ
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey's 'breach of protocol'
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

Rod Rosenstein wrote a very critical report over that, which is what Trump originally gave for firing Comey. But no one believed that story-- which basically was that Trump fired Comey in order to protect Hillary Clinton--

So Trump got on National T.V. and ended up admitting that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation.



Trump was right to fire Comey--there is no doubt about it. The problem is he should have done it as soon as he walked into the Oval office, and not waited until after the Russian investigation was in the news. The only gratification I got was how Comey was fired. While he was giving a speech to surrogates in San Francisco--he got to read about his firing off of a ticker tape---

I will not buy James Comey's book to help with him with his retirement plans. I will not read about his loyalty to this country, when he can't even follow standard DOJ protocol. Comey has an ego that matches Trump's. They both think they're KINGS, and can do anything they want without any reprocussions.

There's a much better book out there anyway.

top seller on Amazon today. Very well written, easy to follow, hard to put down. Verified by credible trusted news sources and their reporting over the last year. Reads like a nonfiction spy novel.

All that spam and not one mention of the thread topic. How much are you paid to spam the board with all the crap?

so the thread is about loretta and Comey going at each other for the most part. the left came in here to shut the thread down by trolling the thread with off topic crap. Shame the mods aren't following along.

There's nothing I stated that isn't true in post # 39. Do you believe that Loretta Lynch had a love affair going on with Comey--when he used an altered russian email to skirt around her authority and jump out in front of congress to give a damming speech about Hillary Clinton? Do you believe that she appreciated the fact that he broke long standing DOJ protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, (after she warned him not to do that) and he did it anyway. She was the one that filed a DOJ complaint on Comey. In fact, if Trump hadn't of fired him, he would still be under investigation for his interference into the election. He used Loretta Lynch's name once or twice to defend what he did, now he has flip flopped on that in his book.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election
'None of it makes much sense': Experts are baffled by Comey's use of a fake Russian document to skirt the DOJ

So Hell Yeah Loretta Lynch is going to go out on the offensive of James Comey. She was his BOSS.

I wonder if now, in (rhetrospect) if Trump primary voters would have appreciated knowing about Trump's inner circle being in continual contact with Russian intelligence agents since 2015? Comey didn't have any problems talking about emails, & he had all this information coming in from Foreign intelligence agencies since 2015.---
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

What we had was a rogue FBI director--that broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions to make a name for himself. That's all he was about. Maybe he was eyeing the Presidency--but he has ended up being fired, and in the process he had a major hand in getting elected the most incompetent, corrupt President in this nation's history, whom he is now going to take down.



Comey should be writing this book in a prison cell as far as I am concerned.

There's a much better book out.

I thought the boss was supposed to just sit back and take the abuse. Isn't that what you all are saying on Trump talking back at comey. which is it? does the boss have a right or not?

I don't give a rats ass what Comey says about Trump and what Trump says about Comey---that has nothing to do with anything.

The point is Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of Justice, which is an impeachable offense, and the dumbass got on National T.V. and admitted to it. The President is held under the same laws as any other citizen in this country.

didn't comey tell trump he wasn't under investigation? at that point, he was okay to fire. you should learn about things. you challenge that let me know.

 

[oreo]

All that spam and not one mention of the thread topic. How much are you paid to spam the board with all the crap?

so the thread is about loretta and Comey going at each other for the most part. the left came in here to shut the thread down by trolling the thread with off topic crap. Shame the mods aren't following along.

There's nothing I stated that isn't true in post # 39. Do you believe that Loretta Lynch had a love affair going on with Comey--when he used an altered russian email to skirt around her authority and jump out in front of congress to give a damming speech about Hillary Clinton? Do you believe that she appreciated the fact that he broke long standing DOJ protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, (after she warned him not to do that) and he did it anyway. She was the one that filed a DOJ complaint on Comey. In fact, if Trump hadn't of fired him, he would still be under investigation for his interference into the election. He used Loretta Lynch's name once or twice to defend what he did, now he has flip flopped on that in his book.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election
'None of it makes much sense': Experts are baffled by Comey's use of a fake Russian document to skirt the DOJ

So Hell Yeah Loretta Lynch is going to go out on the offensive of James Comey. She was his BOSS.

I wonder if now, in (rhetrospect) if Trump primary voters would have appreciated knowing about Trump's inner circle being in continual contact with Russian intelligence agents since 2015? Comey didn't have any problems talking about emails, & he had all this information coming in from Foreign intelligence agencies since 2015.---
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

What we had was a rogue FBI director--that broke long standing DOJ protocol on 3 different occasions to make a name for himself. That's all he was about. Maybe he was eyeing the Presidency--but he has ended up being fired, and in the process he had a major hand in getting elected the most incompetent, corrupt President in this nation's history, whom he is now going to take down.



Comey should be writing this book in a prison cell as far as I am concerned.

There's a much better book out.

I thought the boss was supposed to just sit back and take the abuse. Isn't that what you all are saying on Trump talking back at comey. which is it? does the boss have a right or not?

I don't give a rats ass what Comey says about Trump and what Trump says about Comey---that has nothing to do with anything.

The point is Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of Justice, which is an impeachable offense, and the dumbass got on National T.V. and admitted to it. The President is held under the same laws as any other citizen in this country.

didn't comey tell trump he wasn't under investigation? at that point, he was okay to fire. you should learn about things. you challenge that let me know.

Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey. After he fired James Comey, Mueller opened up Obstruction of Justice on Trump. Trump surrogates were under investigation prior to that for collusion with Russia.

Now they're all under investigation.

 

[skye]

 

[oreo]

Your STUPID ass posters aren't working. Furthermore, you got the equivalent of a Ruth Bader Ginsberg in Niel Gorsuch dumbass.

Gorsuch was a G.W. Bush appointee to the Federal Appeals Court in 2006. At this time Democrats owned the senate and could have easily rejected him.

Here are the Democrats that approved and voted for Niel Gorsuch in 2006.

• There Are 12 Democrat Senators That Supported Gorsuch's Nomination In 2006 And Are Still In The Senate: Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Tom Carper (D-DE), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Patty Murray (D-WA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Jack Reed (D-RI), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), And Ron Wyden (D-OR). ("Senators Of The 109th Congress," U.S. Senate , Accessed 7/27/06) Other Democrat Senators That Supported Gorsuch In 2006 Included Harry Reid (D-NV), John Kerry (D-MA), Barack Obama (D-IL), Joe Biden (D-DE), And Hillary Clinton (D-NY). ("Senators Of The 109th Congress," U.S. Senate ,

Flashback: These Current Democrat Senators All Voted To Support Gorsuch In 2006

In fact the ONLY reason Democrats tried to block Niel Gorsuch, is because they were upset that Republicans didn't give Obama's last nominee Merrick Garland an up or down vote.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee to my memory that during the confirmation hearing stated that Roe V Wade is precedent in the constitution. Meaning set in stone to you.-
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

You dumbass's bought into the Supreme Court Nominee as a reason to vote for the Ass Clown also.

 

[whitehall]

Lefties still have the incredible power of the mainstream media on their side so it's interesting that they are starting to cover their own asses in the likelyhood that they might face indictment during the next three years of the Trump administration.

 

[oreo]

Lefties still have the incredible power of the mainstream media on their side so it's interesting that they are starting to cover their own asses in the likelyhood that they might face indictment during the next three years of the Trump administration.

I am not a lefty or a liberal. I was a lifelong Republican before you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party. I then changed my party status to independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Sure- I don't mind Lynch being on record refuting the Republican BS

In her statement Sunday, Lynch said: "At no time did I ever discuss any aspect of the investigation with anyone from the Clinton campaign or the DNC."
In the book, Comey also says Lynch asked him to call the Clinton email probe "a matter" instead of an investigation, which to him seemed to align with the Clinton campaigns use of euphemisms to avoid using the word "investigation," he wrote.
In her statement, Lynch defended her approach, saying that in her decades as a federal prosecutor, "I have never hesitated to make the hard decisions, guided by the Department of Justice's core principles of integrity, independence and above all, always doing the right thing.
"The Justice Department's handling of the Clinton email investigation under my leadership was no exception," she said. "It was led by a team of non-partisan career prosecutors whose integrity cannot be overstated and whom I trusted to assess the facts and make a recommendation -- one that I ultimately accepted because I thought the evidence and law warranted it."
Lynch, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, told NBC News last week that Comey didn't appear concerned by the decision to call Clinton investigation a "matter," saying that meeting was "like any other we had where we talked about the issues. We had a full and open discussion about it," and Comey never raised concerns.

I’m sure that explains the necessity of a private tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton, where Comey soon after changed the nature of the investigation. I do believe Coney was the first to put Mrs. Lynch under the bus on this. Who had the greater authority between the two? Loretta Lynch is just trying to save face as she waiting until James Comey came forward, to agree to make a statement.

Comey: Then-Atty. Gen. Lynch urged that the Hillary Clinton email probe be called a 'matter,' not 'investigation'

I love how you right wingers get your panties in a knot about Lynch asking Comey to refer to the Trey Gowdy’s email witch hunt as a “matter”.

Did she ask him to deny Clinton was under investigation? No.

Did she ask him to drop the Investigation? No.

Did she ask him to “go easy” on Hillary? No.

Such is the extent of your desperation to find something shady about this discussion that you keep trying to portray this as sinister.

But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy.

Bears quoting:
But Trump asking Comey to swear loyalty to him is fine. Trump asking Comey to “let Flynn go”, isn’t obstruction, and firing Comey for his refusal is no big deal.

Hypocrisy

You nailed it.

none of that is true. If it were we'd know it by now don't you think? What does that have to do with Loretta telling Comey to adjust his talking points? that isn't obstruction? LOL selective judgement I see.

What part isn't true?

Trump asking for Comey for his personal loyalty?
Trump asking Comey to let Flynn go?
Firing Comey for the Russia investigation?

Please do tell.

I don’t see an issue with your concern over “loyalty”. Very specifically tell me how “loyalty” differs from the quote below exactly? Does the DOJ, and those within the president’s cabinet, not help to support the policies of the administration he or she serves?

Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration. Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.

"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So we’ll see," Holder said in an interview on the Tom Joyner radio show.


What content was “letting Flynn go” used in President Trump’s statement?


Who recommended that Coney be fired? I’d it not the alloted fhoice of the President to fire who he chooses, especially since Reno fired 93 US District attorneys during an investigation?

You really gotta try harder than this to prove a point. How many times do I have to debunk your responses?