This guy is the alleged whistle blower but democrats won't let him testify and now it's alleged that he is seeking donations? What the hell is going on? Is Schiff losing what's left of his mind?
A Whistleblower' has
1st-hand account knowledge, which this person does
NOT...
ADMITTEDLY.
THIS person admittedly contacted Schiff PRIOR to filing the complaint. When they did so they passed along 2nd-hand (or 3rd) HEARSAY information in a 'complaint'...a complaint the prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ disregarded because there was
NO EVIDENCE, just
HEARSAY.
This person is the individual who supposedly passed along information they were TOLD by the actual WITNESS to the event. THAT person was so unconcerned that THEY did not file any such report / complaint. THAT person WOULD be the 'whistleblower' had they actually FILED a 'whistleblower' complaint, which they did not.
So the individual everyone is calling a 'whistleblower' is NOT, 1) by LEGAL definition, according to the actual law, and 2) based upon actual knowledge and evidence of what supposedly occurred.
Snowflakes might NOT be, but the prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ actually KNOW that 'EARSAY', 'GOSSIP', and 'INUENDO' do NOT even come close to being ACTUAL EVIDENCE that would be allowed in a criminal case...but it seems to qualify for the desperate standards a DEMOCRAT...and snowflakes ... need to Impeach a REPUBLICAN President.
'WITNESS':
The person who actually witnessed the alleged 'crime' - has 1st-hand account knowledge.
'WHISTLEBLOWER'
The individual who actually witnessed the alleged 'crime' - has 1st-hand account knowledge and who reported the incident through the 'whistleblower' program.
We do not have either in this failed 2.0 coup attempt.