Were you asleep during Bush's 8 years. The country was attacked.
That was a surprise attack and then Bush took action.
Obama does not have that excuse and his actions have been to make the problem(s) worse.
They were told it was going to happen and ignored the warning.
No, they were not. Try to be less of a liar.
I am not a liar, you are just ignorant of the facts.
Nope. YOu are lying.
As usual. the Liberal dunces simply spew the talking points they have been fed.
He didn't get any warnings.
"There was . . . an awareness by the government, including the president, of Osama bin Laden and the threat he posed in the United States and around the world," Fleischer said. "That included long-standing speculation about hijacking in the traditional sense, but not involving suicide bombers using airplanes as missiles."
A CIA spokesman said the agency routinely passed on intelligence citing
the possibility that al Qaeda might be planning to hijack an airliner as part of a terrorist action against the United States. But a suicide attack involving an aircraft was never envisioned, the spokesman said."
Bush Was Told of Hijacking Dangers (washingtonpost.com)
Pretty specific warning, huh?
And...do you know who asked for intelligence briefings?
"The White House said the presidential daily briefing, or PDB, was
requested by Bush, who sought information about the possibility of an al Qaeda attack in the United States."
CNN.com - White House releases*bin Laden memo - Apr 12, 2004
"...information prompted
administration officials to issue a private warning to transportation officials and national security agencies. ... In a press briefing, National Security Adviser
Condoleezza Rice said the threats were very general and did not mention a specific time, place or mode of
terrorist attack."
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=August_6,_2001,_President's_Daily_Briefing_Memo_(External_Links)
Seems like Bush was far more responsible than the oaf in the White House now.....the one who took a nap while Benghazi was under attack, and who routinely refuses intelligence briefings.
Now.....Obama.....
The White House takes pride in the fact that Obama’s PDB is “not briefed to him” – because, they say, he is “among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet.” That hubris brings to mind this revealing quote from a September 2008 New York Times profile of Obama:
“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,” Mr. Obama told Patrick Gaspard, his political director, at the start of the 2008 campaign, according to The New Yorker. “I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m going to think I’m a better political director than my political director.”
So it should come as no surprise that apparently Barack Obama thinks he’s a better intelligence briefer than his intelligence briefers.
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/09/ob...igence-briefer-than-my-intelligence-briefers/
And this...
"BOMBSHELL: Obama Never Once Met With His Defense Intelligence Chief
President Barack Obama twice appointed former Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn to key national security jobs in his administration, including as deputy director of national intelligence and later as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, yet he never once met with Flynn face to face.
he was never called in for a face-to-face meeting with Obama to offer his assessment of ISIS as it rampaged through the Middle East, or during the political meltdown of Libya and Egypt, or on Iran’s efforts to build a nuclear bomb, or of the “Russian reset” that ended in shambles."
Read more:
BOMBSHELL: Obama Never Once Met With His Defense Intelligence Chief
Sooooo....who is more on an imbecile....Obama or NoNeurons