The stupid is strong with this one. ^^^LolRepublicans were invited to sit on the January 6th committee. Don't be a weasel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The stupid is strong with this one. ^^^LolRepublicans were invited to sit on the January 6th committee. Don't be a weasel.
right? The dude has no thought process.The stupid is overwhelming. ^^^
There is no reason to think they didn't steal it.“President Trump shared last week that he believes the FBI stole his will. This was not lawful or necessary. The individuals at the FBI are not Americans. They are criminals.”
Trump “believes” they stole his Will?
Was that a real Will or just one he thought about?
Most "news" sites do this now. I call them "repeater" sites. Makes a story look widespread when it really isn't.I know how TGatewayP does their articles. They copy from a mainstream source and then add their own commentary. In actuallity it's no different than a RW poster on this site.
that's not what the appeals court said. They said they could do what they needed with the documents they had.Not when the Judge orders them NOT to use any documents recovered after approving the Special Master. The DOJ had to go back to court to argue to proceed on just the Classified Documents, and IIRC, that had to go to the Appeals Court for a ruling. And the rest of the document restrictions still fall under the Special Master order.
So "anytime" is incorrect.
WW
The FBI already showed they are willing to take anything that isn't nailed down, moron.“President Trump shared last week that he believes the FBI stole his will. This was not lawful or necessary. The individuals at the FBI are not Americans. They are criminals.”
Trump “believes” they stole his Will?
Was that a real Will or just one he thought about?
I see the exact same article in dozens of places. It's annoying when you're trying to find an article that has a different take on the facts.Most "news" sites do this now. I call them "repeater" sites. Makes a story look widespread when it really isn't.
Perhaps because you’re saying it.The FBI already showed they are willing to take anything that isn't nailed down, moron.
Why is that so hard to believe?
that's not what the appeals court said. They said they could do what they needed with the documents they had.
![]()
Appeals court allows DOJ to resume review of classified records in Trump case
A three-judge appeals court panel on Wednesday granted the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to continue its review of classified documents seized in an FBI search as part of an investigation of former President Trump’s potential mishandling of the information. The judges, two of whom were...news.yahoo.com
How can you demofks always be so wrong? Get the indictment and take it to a grand jury.
I know what it said, so what? why aren't they arraigning him?View attachment 727226
#1 Look at your own link, it points out that it was in relation to the Classified Documents which is what I said. Here I highlighted it in orange.
#2 I'm not a DEM.
#3 LOLs you just proved I'm right and claim I'm wrong. That's classic.
WW
Yes, law enforcement is allowed to seize anything they want from American citizens at any time.
The FBI stole nothing.Talk about a bunch of thieving bastards. I read on another message board the FBI seized 19 articles of clothing & gift items , 33 Books, 1,673 magazines, including framed magazines, newspapers, press articles some of which dated back to 2008 and 42 empty folders labeled “return to staff secretary/military aide”. Also Trump told Hannity they took his last will and testament. It won't be long until that's leaked to the media. This is overkill.
![]()
FBI Stole More Than Documents During Unlawful Raid of Mar-a-Lago - Stole 1,800 Other Items as Well | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
We knew that the corrupt and criminal FBI raided President Trump’s home and stole documents. We also know they inserted information for their filing with the court. Now we find out that over 1,800 “other items” were also stolen by the FBI. Does anyone really know all the FBI stole from...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I have the same attitude about all the progs in this forum..Perhaps because you’re saying it.![]()
The FBI already showed they are willing to take anything that isn't nailed down, moron.
Why is that so hard to believe?
illegally begotten makes it illegal.The FBI stole nothing.
They had a warrant.
me tooI have the same attitude about all the progs in this forum..
The difference is that we have facts and you only have your feelz.I have the same attitude about all the progs in this forum..
That's not what "they" are after. Very few do their own reporting, just who said what and their take on it.I see the exact same article in dozens of places. It's annoying when you're trying to find an article that has a different take on the facts.
How do you know they were co-mingled?Why was Trump's will co-mingled with stolen classified documents?
Must be the same way Trumpistas “know” the FBI stole Melania’s underwear.How do you know they were co-mingled?