Breaking: Democrats and Leftist Media Dread As Tucker Carlson to Fully Reveal January 6 Truth Tonight.

[jc456]

First of all, you said, "doors," plural. But showed only one door. Secondly, you also said, "opened," but the one door you showed was not opened.

Now everyone here sees not only do you make up bullshit -- you even try to defend your made up bullshit when called on it.

Semantics is all you got huh? You laugh at me? Hahaha hahaha, did the cop try to open the door for him?

 

[Faun]

Semantics is all you got huh? You laugh at me? Hahaha hahaha, did the cop try to open the door for him?

Nope, not semantics. You said police opened doors for him. When I asked for proof of that since I knew it was just bullshit you made up, you proved me right as you could produce evidence of police opening up even one door for him.

 

[jc456]

Nope, not semantics. You said police opened doors for him. When I asked for proof of that since I knew it was just bullshit you made up, you proved me right as you could produce evidence of police opening up even one door for him.

They did, watch the video

 

[Lakhota]

 

[BlindBoo]

Yet you had no problem when the FBI released the Steele Dossier only to Buzzfeed News, did you?
I don't see for a second on how this had anything to do with violating our free speech.
If anyone has violated the right of free press, it is the democrats use of MSM as their cudgel against the conservative movement. Then toss in a little Twitter and Facebook for good measure.

Sorry dude, the Steele Dossier was published in it entirety.

Pushing the Faux narrative exclusively based on tiny clips gleaned before the rest of the press has access to the years worth of video footage available, was the federal government using selective power to essentially censor the data from the MSM and American who rely on the MSM.

 

[Care4all]

just watched it again,,
he said "to this day there are disputes as to how he got in",,,

no where did he say he disputes it,,,

He said that AFTER he showed Chansley part of the BREAK IN VIOLENT crowd following them in 10 seconds after door was kicked open.... TUCKERS'S own video showed him breaking in. You can see his horns and flag pole as he came in with the crowd of violent Rioters that tucker showed in a beginning clip. Yet he went on to say this was disputed....WITHOUT SAYING, as "you've just seen in this breaking in video to the capitol, That is NO LONGER IN DISPUTE....".

A JOURNALIST REPORTER would have corrected the lying claim that he was escorted in.... Not go along with it, pretending it could be true....!!!mmm

Sheesh

 

[Care4all]

Sorry dude, the Steele Dossier was published in it entirety.

Pushing the Faux narrative exclusively based on tiny clips gleaned before the rest of the press has access to the years worth of video footage available, was the federal government using selective power to essentially censor the data from the MSM and American who rely on the MSM.

Amen!

 

[Delldude]

Sorry dude, the Steele Dossier was published in it entirety.

FBI had Steele on their payroll in the fall of 2016. Buzzfeed published the leaked story in Jan 2017.

Steele eventually was fired by the FBI for leaking to the press — in violation of his source agreement with the bureau — and lying about it. But that did not happen until Nov. 1, 2016 — after the FISA warrant was secured. And, even then, the court wasn’t notified until a few months later, well after Election Day.

FBI’s Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA

Pushing the Faux narrative exclusively based on tiny clips gleaned before the rest of the press has access to the years worth of video footage available, was the federal government using selective power to essentially censor the data from the MSM and American who rely on the MSM.

But in a Wednesday night statement to CNN, select committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., claimed the panel never analyzed the blockbuster footage Fox News aired this week.

“I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Hiring investigators who “kind of went through the video” doesn’t sound like a very thorough investigation.
__________________________________
The committee clearly had access to the footage Carlson aired this week that contradicted the panel’s key narratives. After all, members of the committee endlessly bragged about how many documents, more than 35,000, investigators reviewed. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who used the committee to dodge responsibility for her own failure to secure the Capitol, just refused to make the tapes public — and after Carlson’s revelations, it’s clear why.
_____________________________________
On Monday, Carlson announced his team discovered proof that Democrats on Pelosi’s probe came across the same footage Fox made public.

“We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the Capitol’s computer system,” said Carlson. “That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party saw this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public.”

Committee staffers even used some of the footage to show Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., allegedly fleeing the Capitol. All Carlson did was extend the footage a few seconds longer than what was televised in the committee’s show-trial hearings, and it became clear Hawley departed the Capitol along with other members of Congress. The clip published by the committee was always demonstrably dishonest.

Top Dem On J6 Panel: We Actually Didn’t Review The Footage

 

[Delldude]

Your twitter headline is an outright lie. Go read the WAPO article.

 

[BlindBoo]

But in a Wednesday night statement to CNN, select committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., claimed the panel never analyzed the blockbuster footage Fox News aired this week.

“I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Hiring investigators who “kind of went through the video” doesn’t sound like a very thorough investigation.

It wasn't blockbuster footage. It was a criminal walking the Hallowed Halls of Congress with a bunch of cops watching him.

Over four and a half years worth of footage to analyze.

 

[Delldude]

It wasn't blockbuster footage. It was a criminal walking the Hallowed Halls of Congress with a bunch of cops watching him.

Over four and a half years worth of footage to analyze.

It's blockbusting as it goes against the J6 narrative that what was going on outside was happening at the very same level inside.

Kinda takes the wind outa their sails.

 

[BlindBoo]

It's blockbusting as it goes against the J6 narrative that what was going on outside was happening at the very same level inside.

Kinda takes the wind outa their sails.

So that barricaded doorway where that poor brainwashed woman was shot, was that on the outside of the building or the inside?

 

[Delldude]

So that barricaded doorway where that poor brainwashed woman was shot, was that on the outside of the building or the inside?

So that level of violence was happening everywhere inside the capitol? If you follow the video, the first group throught the doors went to the second floor.....it was about 50 people, if that.

 

[progressive hunter]

He said that AFTER he showed Chansley part of the BREAK IN VIOLENT crowd following them in 10 seconds after door was kicked open.... TUCKERS'S own video showed him breaking in. You can see his horns and flag pole as he came in with the crowd of violent Rioters that tucker showed in a beginning clip. Yet he went on to say this was disputed....WITHOUT SAYING, as "you've just seen in this breaking in video to the capitol, That is NO LONGER IN DISPUTE....".

A JOURNALIST REPORTER would have corrected the lying claim that he was escorted in.... Not go along with it, pretending it could be true....!!!mmm

Sheesh

if youre going to jump into the middle of a discussion at least make it be relevant and makes sense,,

 

[Care4all]

if youre going to jump into the middle of a discussion at least make it be relevant and makes sense,,

Oops!
Okay!

 

[basquebromance]

Prosecutors say Tucker Carlson omitted key Jan. 6 footage of ‘QAnon Shaman’

Federal prosecutors said footage that Fox News host Tucker Carlson aired last week of the “QAnon Shaman” during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol lacks context, according to newly filed court documents. The Justice Department said the footage aired by Carlson, which showed rioter...

news.yahoo.com

/thread

 

[progressive hunter]

Prosecutors say Tucker Carlson omitted key Jan. 6 footage of ‘QAnon Shaman’

Federal prosecutors said footage that Fox News host Tucker Carlson aired last week of the “QAnon Shaman” during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol lacks context, according to newly filed court documents. The Justice Department said the footage aired by Carlson, which showed rioter...

news.yahoo.com

/thread

what did he leave out?? you cant just say something was left out without showing what that was,,

 

[Delldude]

what did he leave out?? you cant just say something was left out without showing what that was,,

“Chansley then entered the Senate Gallery, where he proceeded to scream obscenities while other rioters rifled through the desks of U.S. Senators on the floor below,” the filing continued.

Funny, I seem to remember him leading the room in prayer for our country.

 

[Faun]

They did, watch the video

You're deranged, con. There's no video showing a cop opening a door for Chansley.

If you think there is, post a screenshot of a cop holding a door open for him...

 

[Delldude]

You're deranged, con. There's video showing a cop opening a door for Chansley.

If you think there is, post a screenshot of a cop holding a door open for him...

Look at the smiling guy in black tactical gear on the right door.