Yep and oddly enough Benghazi is the perfect thing to bring up right now. Benghazi took years for Republicans in Congress to give up because Clinton and the Obama administration did not act criminally.
I love how snowflakes' arguments have come all the way around full circle to the point where they have embraced the word 'CRIMINALLY' as a last-ditch effort to defend Hillary and Barry.
When it was brought up about how F*ing incompetent, political, and useless the two were in regards to Benghazi - not criminal - the snowflakes argued they did NOTHING wrong. Now, after everything was exposed about Benghazi they have changed their defense to 'nothing CRIMINAL'.
Even that is partially wrong, though...
1. Obama dragged the US into the middle of a civil war in Libya - dragged our country into an UN-CONSTITUTIONAL, UN-APPROVED WAR to help AL QAEDA - the terrorists who slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 - overthrow, murder, and replace another nation's leader, a leader who was HELPING the US-led coalition fight terrorists in Northern Africa. Had Obama never done this it is a safe bet that 4 Americans would still be alive today. THIS, btw, was the one thing Barry did ILLEGALLY, against the Constitution.
2. NON-Criminal but still criminally incompetent was Hilary's / Obama's / ther State Department's handling of the entire colossal disaster:
- Hiring an Al Qaeda-associated militia to protect a US Ambassador and Americans
- Refusing to take all the Americans out when every other nation pulled their people out
- REJECTING the Ambassador's more than 50 pleas for additional security, even after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound in the weeks leading up to the Middle East-wide attacks on 9/11/01. despite Stevens telling the State Dept after the 2nd attack that if there was a 3rd, more organized attack on the compound he would die
- Taking security team members AWAY after the 2nd terrorist attack on the compound and after the Al Qaeda-associated militia quit weeks before the final attack
- LYING about the video being the reason for the attacks...when they acknowledged they knew not only about the threat of a Middle East-wide attack on US embassies on the anniversary of 9/11/01 but also about Al Qaeda's call for Stevens' assassination in retaliation for the death of an Al Qaeda leader months earlier from Obama drone strike.
- The State Dept modifying more than 9 times, removing all references to a terrorist attack, the initial CIA report filed within an hour of the 9/11/12 attack on the compound calling it a terrorist attack
- To this day the US govt / Obama administration has never told the American people where Obama was that night (don't just say 'BS' - provide the link / evidence to where he was!)
- Hillary telling the parents / loved ones it was over a video despite her own e-mails to the Turkish Ambassador and her daughter immediately after the attack declaring she knew it was not the video but was a terrorist attack
- releasing the 'mastermind' behind the attacks shortly after capturing him a year later....but arresting / jailing the video maker for exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech
Yeah, according to snowflakes, none of that is incompetence, F*ing up, refusing to protect Americans, etc.....
No, now their battle cry is 'nothing illegal' was done wrong.
At the same time they claim Obama / Hillary did nothing wrong because no charges were filed, they claim Trump is guilty based on no evidence presented.
Good Lord, snowflakes are bat-shit crazy.
