Judge Rules Mahmoud Khalil can't be deported based on Marco Rubio's determination

[ThisIsMe]

Yeah, we have something in this country called laws and when you sue someone, in this case, the Trump administration in a particular district, it will go before a judge and they will rule on it. If you break the law, or violate the constitution, as the Trump administration has been doing then yes, Judges will rule against him and his administration. Who knew this was how the court system worked in America!

thats fine...Just understand, the right can ...and should do this the next time a democrat preolsident takes office.

 

[krichton]

thats fine...Just understand, the right can ...and should do this the next time a democrat preolsident takes office.

What stopped them from doing it when Biden was president? Anyone could have sued Biden for violating the constitution and it's laws. I'll tell you why, nothing like that happened

 

[ThisIsMe]

What stopped them from doing it when Biden was president? Anyone could have sued Biden for violating the constitution and it's laws. I'll tell you why, nothing like that happened

Because the right doesnt operate that way? We are seeing now, maybe they should?

 

[krichton]

Because the right doesnt operate that way? We are seeing now, maybe they should?

Soooo, every time there's a democratic president there aren't multiple investigations? Biden was the last president who had multiple investigations against him and when the GOP couldn't find anything, they were like, what the hell, we'll just go after his family, even though they have nothing to do with the government. Republicans have literally invented dirty politics. Boy you really have drank the koolaid haven't you?

 

[jc456]

Soooo, every time there's a democratic president there aren't multiple investigations? Biden was the last president who had multiple investigations against him and when the GOP couldn't find anything, they were like, what the hell, we'll just go after his family, even though they have nothing to do with the government. Republicans have literally invented dirty politics. Boy you really have drank the koolaid haven't you?

They have evidence

 

[krichton]

They have evidence

Sure

 

[ThisIsMe]

Soooo, every time there's a democratic president there aren't multiple investigations?

Every president is investigated. However, dems took it to a new level when they vowed to investigate and impeach before he even got his campaign off the ground.

Its funny, trump was a cultural icon before he ran for president. People loved him, he was written into songs, had popular TV shows, then he ran for president and the dems turned on him in an instant..

Biden was the last president who had multiple investigations against him and when the GOP couldn't find anything,

Oh no, they found things, but Hur said biden would appear to be an elderly man with a poor memory. The report actually said that he did commit crimes. Hell that was obvious. His daughter did write in her diary that biden did shower with her at an inappropriate age. But, because biden was having mental issues, nobody wanted to beat the man while he was down.

they were like, what the hell, we'll just go after his family, even though they have nothing to do with the government.

hunter? Well yeah, he was doing coke off a hooker stomach and getting blow jobs and he put it on video. He broke the law by lying on a federal firearm background check...

Republicans have literally invented dirty politics. Boy you really have drank the koolaid haven't you?

Lol, do you own a mirror?

 

[krichton]

Every president is investigated. However, dems took it to a new level when they vowed to investigate and impeach before he even got his campaign off the ground.

Who was investigated that didn't deserve it? Since this happens to every president it shouldn't be difficult to come up with names.

hunter? Well yeah, he was doing coke off a hooker stomach and getting blow jobs and he put it on video. He broke the law by lying on a federal firearm background check...

God forbid!!! Now tell me why the government should care why a private citizen is having sex with hookers and owning an unregistered gun, other than to play the usual dirty tricks which has been synonymous with the GOP party.

As for Biden, you still haven't told me what constitutional violations he's guilty of to warrant an investigation, like Trump's many crimes. I'll wait.

Lol, do you own a mirror?

Did Democrats investigate Bush sr or jr? Political investigations started with Clinton and haven't stopped. And republicans haven't found a single thing they could potentially charge a democratic president with other than Clinton getting bjs, which was not what they were originally investigating. Keep drinking the koolaid bro, maybe one day your republican masters will reward you.

 

[Edgetho]

Who was investigated that didn't deserve it? Since this happens to every president it shouldn't be difficult to come up with names.


God forbid!!! Now tell me why the government should care why a private citizen is having sex with hookers and owning an unregistered gun, other than to play the usual dirty tricks which has been synonymous with the GOP party.

As for Biden, you still haven't told me what constitutional violations he's guilty of to warrant an investigation, like Trump's many crimes. I'll wait.



Did Democrats investigate Bush sr or jr? Political investigations started with Clinton and haven't stopped. And republicans haven't found a single thing they could potentially charge a democratic president with other than Clinton getting bjs, which was not what they were originally investigating. Keep drinking the koolaid bro, maybe one day your republican masters will reward you.

Political Investigations started with Nixon.

Had that Fraternity Prank happened today, he would have told dimocrap scum to eat a bag of dicks and ignored all of it.

Do you practice being stupid or does it come naturally?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who was investigated that didn't deserve it?

Thats subjective. Id say that trump didnt deserve to have people vowing to impeach him before he even was elected. Id say letitia james shouldn't have weaponized her office by campaigning to find something to investigate trump for, as a campaign promise.

The 34 felonies that stemmed from one charge is bogus and it was all based on a BS legal theory that even other new york attorneys said was odd

Those are some. Dems loved trump until he ran for president.

Since this happens to every president it shouldn't be difficult to come up with names.

See above

God forbid!!! Now tell me why the government should care why a private citizen is having sex with hookers and owning an unregistered gun, other than to play the usual dirty tricks which has been synonymous with the GOP party.

Dirty tricks have been used by the dems for the last 10 years. As far as Hunter, they actually weren't interested in his coke fueled escapades, at first. They were more interested in his ties to Ukraine, and how he was selling access to his father.

As for Biden, you still haven't told me what constitutional violations he's guilty of to warrant an investigation, like Trump's many crimes. I'll wait.

Not securing the border.

Did Democrats investigate Bush sr or jr?

They wanted to. Impeachment articles were introduced, but didnt go anywhere.

Political investigations started with Clinton and haven't stopped.

Clinton shouldn't have abused an intern and then lie to congress about it.

And republicans haven't found a single thing they could potentially charge a democratic president

Sure they have. Bidens documents, flooding the border, scandal in ukraine,ignoring supreme court on student loan repayments.

with other than Clinton getting bjs, which was not what they were originally investigating.

He wasnt impeached for bjs, he was impeached for lying to congress.

Keep drinking the koolaid bro, maybe one day your republican masters will reward you.

Kool aid has too much sugar. Lightly sweet tea is more my style...and im not looking for any reward.

 

[krichton]

Political Investigations started with Nixon.

Had that Fraternity Prank happened today, he would have told dimocrap scum to eat a bag of dicks and ignored all of it.

Do you practice being stupid or does it come naturally?

I would say Nixon deserved it, wouldn't you? Not to mention, the vote in the senate was 77-0 to move forward with impeachment. Do you practice not knowing anything or does it just come naturally?

 

[Rigby5]

God you are a moron. The League of Nations created Israel as part of the breaking up of the Ottoman Empire in the wake of WWI. The USA wasn’t even a member of the League of Nations. The LoN gave the administration of Trans Jordan and the creation of the various Northern African countries to the British along with the French. The British split Trans Jordan into a Muslim Jordan and a Jewish Israel, although the Brits refused to turn Israel over to the Jews until forced to by the UN after WWII, but rather than deporting the Muslims into Jordan, they set internal borders within Israel to create indefensible borders with hostile Muslims enclaves salted throughout what was to become Israel. The USA had nothing to do with any of that.

Wrong.
The League of Nations did absolutely nothing over Israel because it did not at all exist until the UN created it in 1948.
What the League of Nations created was the independent native state of Palestine.
In 1920, the Treaty of Sevres and Treaty of San Remo created the native Palestine in return for the Arab Palestinians helping Lawrence of Arabia to defeat the Ottoman Empire.

And no, the League of Nations cannot and did not give any country to anybody.
The Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres created the British Mandate for Palestine, but the did not mean the British owned Palestine. Instead what a Mandate means is that the British had an obligation to prepare Palestine for independence.

The reason the UN got involved is that the illegal immigrant, Menachem Begin, blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, so no longer wanted any part in it.

But here is Sir Winston Churchill straightening out the false claim of Israel ever being legal.
The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922
{...
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

It clearly says Palestine was to be for the native Arabs, and the only thing the Jews got was facilitated immigration into the Arab Palestine.

 

[Rigby5]

Exactly!
Judea and Samaria belong to the Arabs.
Pretty sneaky that the Arab invaders gave them Jewish names.
DURR

Wrong.
There is no Judea or Samaria and have not been any since the Assyrian defeated them around 800 BC.
And Judea and Samaria are not Jewish names.
Names with a 'J', like Jordan, Jericho, Jerusalem, etc., are Canaanite names by their tradition of using a 'J' to start their names.
The Jews were called Hebrew until they captured Jerusalem from the Canaanites, and only then did people start calling them Jews instead of Hebrew.
The name Samaria comes from the Sumerians, not the Jews.

 

[Rigby5]

You’ve got the lib mind virus, you’ve lost touch with reality.
Google this: What happened in Israel on October 7 2023
Report back here afterwards…You’re welcome for the free enlightenment.

What happened on October 7, 2023 was the much deserved retribution for the murder, imprisonment, or exile of millions of native Palestinians who actually own all of what is claimed to be Israel.
The Israelis are all criminals because they never paid for any land.
The illegal starvation blockade for over 2 decades alone is enough to justify October 7, 2023.

 

[Rigby5]

He wasnt impeached for bjs, he was impeached for lying to congress.

Clinton was not convicted of anything.
{...
The approved articles of impeachment would be submitted to the United States Senate on January 7, 1999. A trial in the Senate then began, with Chief Justice William Rehnquist presiding. On February 12, Clinton was acquitted on both counts as neither received the necessary two-thirds majority vote of the senators present for conviction and removal from office—in this instance 67 votes were needed.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

It will be overturned.

Khalil is a fascist Arab, who works at overthrowing the West.

People here on visa's have no right to remain if we take their visa away.

He is an enemy alien.

Wrong.
No Arab Moslem is working to over throw anyone.
The Quran is against over throws.
Its the US that like to illegally over throw legal countries.

You can't legally take away his Visa, and he is not an "enemy Alien".
It is Israel that the UN has found to be guilty of war crimes, not the Palestinians.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Clinton was not convicted of anything.
{...
The approved articles of impeachment would be submitted to the United States Senate on January 7, 1999. A trial in the Senate then began, with Chief Justice William Rehnquist presiding. On February 12, Clinton was acquitted on both counts as neither received the necessary two-thirds majority vote of the senators present for conviction and removal from office—in this instance 67 votes were needed.
...}

Ok, what am I supposed to do with this?