Breaking: 10 dead 25 injured after "woman wearing a dress" opens fire on school in BC, Canada

Do you really follow this fool. He's whining about what MSM is reporting and you believe him. MSM is reporting news based on the information the RCMP have given them.
You have absolutely ZERO credibility. Literally everything you post is false.
Another ******* leftist who hides facts.
 
Do you really follow this fool. He's whining about what MSM is reporting and you believe him. MSM is reporting news based on the information the RCMP have given them.
are you saying the report he is reading is not correct??

or are you attacking the messenger because you cant refute his message??
 

Please, let us not be disrespectful to this GUNPERSON IN DRESS whose mass shooting resulting in 10 dead and 25 injured after ‘gunperson in dress’ opens fire at school & home in Canada in horror mass shooting.

“GUNPERSON IN DRESS.”

This kind of stuff is just amazing.

GUNPERSON IN DRESS?

Why not “SHOOTER”, GUNWOMAN, GUNMAN?

GUNPERSON IS HILARIOUS. 😂
As far as I'm concerned, if someone becomes a mass murderer you should refer to them as the gender that they do not identify as, in order to be as disrespectful to them as humanly possible because they have earned that disrespect. Maybe put a picture of them and poke fun at their weight problem if they have or something as well.

Then step back and see how many more people want to be mercilessly made fun of and disrespected in the future because they chose to be a mass murderer.

My guess is not as many as do it today who are "respected".

What am I missing here?
 
This shooting --can't-- be because Of Canada's permissive gun laws, because Canada has all the 'common sense' gun laws.
Right?
Why they did not prevent this shooting, no liberal will ever tell us.
 
No one said it never happens elsewhere. It’s very rare but it happens. The fact that the shooter is a woman, makes it even less common.



Are you deranged???? Trying to make this about your irrational fear of trans people? You need help for your sickness.

The shooter has been identified as a woman, although her name has not been released. This happened in a town of 2500 people. Everyone in this community has been affected.

Such is the vileness of the MAGA Cult that they try to use every mass shooting to promote their hate and dysfunction.

Your obsession with transgendered people is getting people killed, Asshole!

This is a town of 2500 people.

The shooter is not a woman. He's a man in a dress with a 5:00 shadow
 
As far as I'm concerned, if someone becomes a mass murderer you should refer to them as the gender that they do not identify as, in order to be as disrespectful to them as humanly possible because they have earned that disrespect. Maybe put a picture of them and poke fun at their weight problem if they have or something as well.

Then step back and see how many more people want to be mercilessly made fun of and disrespected in the future because they chose to be a mass murderer.

My guess is not as many as do it today who are "respected".

What am I missing here?
That doesn't just apply to transgenders, it applies to all dumocraps. They are all sexually confused cross dressing psychopathic pedophiles, so it makes perfect sense to give them all the respect they deserve, which is zero.
 
15th post
Gunperson. 🙄

These libturds have no clue how ridiculous they appear.

They try so hard to be political and ideologically “pure,” they overlook perfectly acceptable alternatives to their absurd linguistic efforts: like “shooter.”
Total idiocy. It's breathtaking how much they'll contort themselves in the name of political correctness.
 
Anyone misgendering the murderer will face prison in Canaduh.
They wouldn't dare put the psychopathic, sexually confused killer in prison, but they most certainly would put anyone who misgenders that psychopathic, sexually confused killer in prison. I think it is time for Trump to take over Canada and Greenland in one big sweep.
 
Come get me, RCMP.
I would identify the shooter properly.

One article suggested it had been described as a female in a dress.

Astounding.

But maybe it was a male in a dress.

Either way, the dress isn’t the most significant or accurate detail.
 
Back
Top Bottom