Breakdown

[kc48]

Did you noticie that in that list, I say PER 100 shares? You don”t know how to read right?

So your numbers are less than 100.

 

[Luckyone]

So your numbers are less than 100.

Did you read the explanation that I gave in the response? Evidently, you did not understand it.

 

[kc48]

Did you read the explanation that I gave in the response? Evidently, you did not understand it.

No, I did not read it. A simple yes or no will do.

 

[MarathonMike]

In addition, I cannot see anything out there (fundamentally or chart-wise) that could turn this around.

As such, this is now officially a full-blown correction at the very least.

This was Bankers' bold prediction 1 month ago. Today, the S&P hit an ALL-TIME HIGH!!! As far as stock market predictions go, this guy is NostraDumbass.

 

[Luckyone]

No, I did not read it. A simple yes or no will do.

The reason I use "per 100 shares" is that my subscribers to my service have different investment amounts they use. Some may only have a few thousand dollars and some may have hundreds of thousands of dollars, or even millions.

As such, I cannot be specific on how much money I made or the amount of shares I traded because each person will have different results and profits depending on the amount of shares they personally traded.

I do not handle anyone's money or investments. I just tell them what stocks I am buying and at what prices and then when I get out, I tell them the amount made PER 100 SHARES as that is a "standard" way of saying things legally.

I cannot tell them I made $25,000 on this or that stock because they will believe they should make the same. Nonetheless, maybe I invested $100,000 to make $25,000 and if they do not have $100,000 to invest, it would be misleading. Such action is legally improper.

This is what my lawyers told me to do, to keep me away from having any legal problems.

Do you now understand?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I tell them the amount made PER 100 SHARES as that is a "standard" way of saying things legally.

Because you're full of shit.
No one reports performance "per 100 shares".
Moron.

 

[Luckyone]

Because you're full of shit.
No one reports performance "per 100 shares".
Moron.

Don't tell me, tell that to my lawyers.

I do NOT handle people's money!!!!! I just tell them what I am buying/selling and where to put the stop loss and what the objective is, and I do that in advance. I then tell them where I got out within a few minutes of when I did get out, so they can do the same themselves............if THEY want to.

You are a ******* asshole that is blind-by-choice and totally ignorant of how things work. No wonder I put you on ignore. You are now back on it, permanently!

You are a total piece of shit, not worthy of anyone's time, much less my own.

Go back to where you and your buddies live!

I won't even call you a moron as that would be a compliment to you.

 

[MarathonMike]

The reason I use "per 100 shares" is that my subscribers to my service have different investment amounts they use. Some may only have a few thousand dollars and some may have hundreds of thousands of dollars, or even millions.

As such, I cannot be specific on how much money I made or the amount of shares I traded because each person will have different results and profits depending on the amount of shares they personally traded.

I do not handle anyone's money or investments. I just tell them what stocks I am buying and at what prices and then when I get out, I tell them the amount made PER 100 SHARES as that is a "standard" way of saying things legally.

I cannot tell them I made $25,000 on this or that stock because they will believe they should make the same. Nonetheless, maybe I invested $100,000 to make $25,000 and if they do not have $100,000 to invest, it would be misleading. Such action is legally improper.

This is what my lawyers told me to do, to keep me away from having any legal problems.

Do you now understand?

Can you post your subscriber's list? I have some lovely beachfront property in Arizona to sell.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don't tell me, tell that to my lawyers.

I do NOT handle people's money!!!!! I just tell them what I am buying/selling and where to put the stop loss and what the objective is, and I do that in advance. I then tell them where I got out within a few minutes of when I did get out, so they can do the same themselves............if THEY want to.

You are a ******* asshole that is blind-by-choice and totally ignorant of how things work. No wonder I put you on ignore. You are now back on it, permanently!

You are a total piece of shit, not worthy of anyone's time, much less my own.

Go back to where you and your buddies live!

View attachment 1199183

I won't even call you a moron as that would be a compliment to you.

Don't tell me, tell that to my lawyers.

Your "lawyers" told you to use a stupid measurement that no one else ever uses?

And you listened?

Damn, you're even dumber than you first appeared.

No wonder I put you on ignore. You are now back on it, permanently!

Obviously. Because every time you respond to my corrections of your huge errors, it makes you look even worse.

Moron.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Can you post your subscriber's list? I have some lovely beachfront property in Arizona to sell.

I want to see the letter from his lawyers, telling him to report his results "per 100 shares".

 

[Concerned American]

Can you post your subscriber's list? I have some lovely beachfront property in Arizona to sell.

I wonder if the SEC would be interested in seeing Lucky's posts. His post #67 might be and example of classic 'pump and dump.'

 

[luiza]

The indexes broke down today in a "convincing" way. Not only did they break the pivotal intraweek supports, but did it with positive fundamental news that generated a reversal day of indicative consequence, all by itself.

In addition, I cannot see anything out there (fundamentally or chart-wise) that could turn this around.

As such, this is now officially a full-blown correction at the very least.

Chart-wise, there are no supports below in the DOW for another 1000 points, in the SPX for another 400 points and in the NAZ for another 2000 points. Drops down to those levels would mean a correction of 9% (DOW) to as much at 15% (NAZ).

Those figures are quite normal in a "full-blown" correction (and even more).

Here is the pic that shows you exactly what I mean:

Another blundering and useless thread started by big head who never gets it right .

A bit like his disastrous Free Gift which remains a Free Grift .

Your Mummy must really hate you , Mucky .