Breakdown

[Luckyone]

Details. This is what I am talking about. Look at your second sentence. You typed "her." Do you mean "here?" Even if you meant "here" your sentence is not coherent.

Do you think anyone wants financial advice from someone like this?

You are right, I am a total failure. I guess I was simply lucky that over the past 18 years (since I have had my chart service), I have consistently made more profits than losses year after year, and that 5 of my original subscribers from back in 2007, are still with me paying me $30 a month for "financial advice". I guess that they are simply 100% stupid people. I also guess that Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache (in the 80's) were stupid when they paid me (over $40,000 bonus) to be one of their tech analysts and in the case of Pru-Bache, one of their 5 "official" tech analysts for the Southeast.

I guess I was right on one thing, choosing my "Luckyone" nick, right?

 

[kc48]

You are right, I am a total failure. I guess I was simply lucky that over the past 18 years (since I have had my chart service), I have consistently made more profits than losses year after year, and that 5 of my original subscribers from back in 2007, are still with me paying me $30 a month for "financial advice". I guess that they are simply 100% stupid people. I also guess that Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache (in the 80's) were stupid when they paid me (over $40,000 bonus) to be one of their tech analysts and in the case of Pru-Bache, one of their 5 "official" tech analysts for the Southeast.

I guess I was right on one thing, choosing my "Luckyone" nick, right?

Gee, another internet guru touting the fortunes he never had but says he has. How original.

 

[Luckyone]

Gee, another internet guru touting the fortunes he never had but says he has. How original.

First of all, I never lie (a hard lesson I learned over 60 years ago). Having said that, here is proof of one of the things you are calling me a liar about.

Here is my service newsletter that I provide every week to my subscribers. In it, you have links to all 936 newsletters I have written over the past 18 years. In addition, every end of the month I provide a status on all the trades I have done, plus a running total for the year, and every year going back to 2007. The newsletter here is the one from the beginning of November and in it you can see that so far for the year, I am up $19,475 per 100 shares traded, for the year.

This is a public (for subscribers) newsletter so if there are "any lies", I could be legally prosecuted for them:

Sample Newsletter

You have now been proven to be a misinformed critic that likes to debase others with no proof of what you say is true.

 

[kc48]

First of all, I never lie (a hard lesson I learned over 60 years ago). Having said that, here is proof of one of the things you are calling me a liar about.

Here is my service newsletter that I provide every week to my subscribers. In it, you have links to all 936 newsletters I have written over the past 18 years. In addition, every end of the month I provide a status on all the trades I have done, plus a running total for the year, and every year going back to 2007. The newsletter here is the one from the beginning of November and in it you can see that so far for the year, I am up $19,475 per 100 shares traded, for the year.

This is a public (for subscribers) newsletter so if there are "any lies", I could be legally prosecuted for them:

Sample Newsletter

You have now been proven to be a misinformed critic that likes to debase others with no proof of what you say is true.

You charge well over 300 annually for your "newsletter." All you need is a couple or 3 dozen suckers to fund your "earnings" over 18 years. You people are hilarious.

 

[kc48]

I was totally bullshitting Tony with my first few posts, and he could not figure it out. Sure, that's someone I would listen to.

 

[Luckyone]

You charge well over 300 annually for your "newsletter." All you need is a couple or 3 dozen suckers to fund your "earnings" over 18 years. You people are hilarious.

FYI, there are other companies that do what I do and they charge as much as $300 per month. I charge for my expenses in doing the neesletter and they get updates every day. I do not advertise (mostly referrals from existíng subscribers and from comments I make on investment Boards. I do it to help others gain from my knowledge ( I care about people) I make ten times more money from my own trading than what I get from the newsletter. You are a total asshole!

 

[kc48]

FYI, there are other companies that do what I do and they charge as much as $300 per month. I charge for my expenses in doing the neesletter and they get updates every day. I do not advertise (mostly referrals from existíng subscribers and from comments I make on investment Boards. I do it to help others gain from my knowledge ( I care about people) I make ten times more money from my own trading than what I get from the newsletter. You are a total asshole!

I roughly looked at your "profits." Appears to be about 7k annually. If you were so great at ML and PB, you should be making a lot more than that.

 

[kc48]

I make ten times more money from my own trading than what I get from the newsletter

Based on the numbers in your link, that means you have 2-3 subscribers. You are so full of crap.

 

[Winco]

I am short 3 stocks.

1) I shorted CRDO at 180.64 on November 3rd. Closed today at 134.73.

2) I shorted EDC on November 3rd at 56.50. Closed today at 48.55.

3) I shorted ORCL on November 3rd at 257.85. Closed today at 210.69.

I am long 4 stocks

1) I am long BCTX at 4.03. Closed today at 7.02.

2) I am long LXRX at 1.02. Closed today at 1.32.

3) I am long NB at 6.88. Stock closed today at 5.22

4) I am long VWDRY at 5.76. It closed today at 7.70.

I am diversified but recently I have turned aggressively short while being conservatively long. I have been handpicking stocks based on charts and independent-to-the-stock fundamentals

So you are 7 for 7.
Never miss, is that what you are claiming?

 

[Luckyone]

So you are 7 for 7.
Never miss, is that what you are claiming?

In that list I am 6 for 7. Those were the positions I was was holding on that day. I am out of 2 of those positions now. I did not mention the losing trades that day, given that I was already out of them. I usually run about 55-45 on gains and losses, but my losses are usually smaller than my gains.

 

[Luckyone]

Based on the numbers in your link, that means you have 2-3 subscribers. You are so full of crap.

You must be right. You know it all!

 

[kc48]

In that list I am 6 for 7. Those were the positions I was was holding on that day. I am out of 2 of those positions now. I did not mention the losing trades that day, given that I was already out of them. I usually run about 55-45 on gains and losses, but my losses are usually smaller than my gains.

So why do you try to brag on here? Is it the usual mundane reason?

 

[kc48]

You must be right. You know it all!

You just gave me your numbers. Duh.

 

[Luckyone]

I roughly looked at your "profits." Appears to be about 7k annually. If you were so great at ML and PB, you should be making a lot more than that.

Did you noticie that in that list, I say PER 100 shares? You don”t know how to read right?

 

[kc48]

Did you noticie that in that list, I say PER 100 shares? You don”t know how to read right?

Dude, you think I am reading with a fine tooth comb? Get over yourself.

 

[kc48]

Luckyone, Whatchoo doin' for T day? Hope you ain't on the computer. Take a break, Hoss.

 

[Luckyone]

Dude, you think I am reading with a fine tooth comb? Get over yourself.

Let me explain it to you in a way that your child's mind can understand.

For example, let's use a $100,000 portfolio and let's use my system of trading that uses diversification into at least 6 different stocks and in hopefully 6 different industries. In addition, I never use more that 15% investment (of the portfolio amount) into any 1 stock.

Having said that, it means that if I am trading a $300 stock, I will only be buying 50 shares as that means a $15,000 investment. A $100 stock will take 150 shares. a $30 stock will take 500 shares, and a $3 stock will take 5000 shares.

So when I say I made $19,000 this year per 100 shares, it that was all in the $300 stock, it means I made $9,500 but if it was made in the $3 stock, I made $950,000.

The reason I use this way of expressing the results is that each person/subscriber trades their own account and I have no way of knowing if they are trading a $10,000 account or a $1 million account. As such, giving my own personal account results would be misinformation as none of the subscribers will have in the market what I have in the market, or trading each and every one of the stocks that I trade. They each choose what stocks to trade (if any) and the amount of shares to trade in their own account. As such, their results compared to mine (trading some or all of my mentions) can be totally different (much better or worse).

This is a legal issue that my lawyer showed me when I started the service. He was the one that said "you should put the results as "per 100 shares. to avoid any legal issues".

Do you understand why your post stating what you said is totally misinformed?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I am short 3 stocks.

1) I shorted CRDO at 180.64 on November 3rd. Closed today at 134.73.

2) I shorted EDC on November 3rd at 56.50. Closed today at 48.55.

3) I shorted ORCL on November 3rd at 257.85. Closed today at 210.69.

I am long 4 stocks

1) I am long BCTX at 4.03. Closed today at 7.02.

2) I am long LXRX at 1.02. Closed today at 1.32.

3) I am long NB at 6.88. Stock closed today at 5.22

4) I am long VWDRY at 5.76. It closed today at 7.70.

I am diversified but recently I have turned aggressively short while being conservatively long. I have been handpicking stocks based on charts and independent-to-the-stock fundamentals

Did you post these trades on the trade date?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Let me explain it to you in a way that your child's mind can understand.

For example, let's use a $100,000 portfolio and let's use my system of trading that uses diversification into at least 6 different stocks and in hopefully 6 different industries. In addition, I never use more that 15% investment (of the portfolio amount) into any 1 stock.

Having said that, it means that if I am trading a $300 stock, I will only be buying 50 shares as that means a $15,000 investment. A $100 stock will take 150 shares. a $30 stock will take 500 shares, and a $3 stock will take 5000 shares.

So when I say I made $19,000 this year per 100 shares, it that was all in the $300 stock, it means I made $9,500 but if it was made in the $3 stock, I made $950,000.

The reason I use this way of expressing the results is that each person/subscriber trades their own account and I have no way of knowing if they are trading a $10,000 account or a $1 million account. As such, giving my own personal account results would be misinformation as none of the subscribers will have in the market what I have in the market, or trading each and every one of the stocks that I trade. They each choose what stocks to trade (if any) and the amount of shares to trade in their own account. As such, their results compared to mine (trading some or all of my mentions) can be totally different (much better or worse).

This is a legal issue that my lawyer showed me when I started the service. He was the one that said "you should put the results as "per 100 shares. to avoid any legal issues".

Do you understand why your post stating what you said is totally misinformed?

Having said that, it means that if I am trading a $300 stock, I will only be buying 50 shares as that means a $15,000 investment. A $100 stock will take 150 shares. a $30 stock will take 500 shares, and a $3 stock will take 5000 shares.

So when I say I made $19,000 this year per 100 shares, it that was all in the $300 stock, it means I made $9,500 but if it was made in the $3 stock, I made $950,000.

OMG!

That's the dumbest ******* explanation ever!!!

This is a legal issue that my lawyer showed me when I started the service. He was the one that said "you should put the results as "per 100 shares. to avoid any legal issues".

Bullshit.

 

[kc48]

Let me explain it to you in a way that your child's mind can understand.

For example, let's use a $100,000 portfolio and let's use my system of trading that uses diversification into at least 6 different stocks and in hopefully 6 different industries. In addition, I never use more that 15% investment (of the portfolio amount) into any 1 stock.

Having said that, it means that if I am trading a $300 stock, I will only be buying 50 shares as that means a $15,000 investment. A $100 stock will take 150 shares. a $30 stock will take 500 shares, and a $3 stock will take 5000 shares.

So when I say I made $19,000 this year per 100 shares, it that was all in the $300 stock, it means I made $9,500 but if it was made in the $3 stock, I made $950,000.

The reason I use this way of expressing the results is that each person/subscriber trades their own account and I have no way of knowing if they are trading a $10,000 account or a $1 million account. As such, giving my own personal account results would be misinformation as none of the subscribers will have in the market what I have in the market, or trading each and every one of the stocks that I trade. They each choose what stocks to trade (if any) and the amount of shares to trade in their own account. As such, their results compared to mine (trading some or all of my mentions) can be totally different (much better or worse).

This is a legal issue that my lawyer showed me when I started the service. He was the one that said "you should put the results as "per 100 shares. to avoid any legal issues".

Do you understand why your post stating what you said is totally misinformed?

tldr