BRAVO! Greg Kelly Airs Photos of All of the Jan. 6 Political Prisoners Still in Gulag without Trial (VIDEO)

[meaner gene]

The state legislatures have an obligation to the voters. The audits are happpening because of those voters. If fraud is proven ( it has been to half the country) something will get done.

Actually the states have an obligation that starts months to years before a federal election, to insure that the count will be correct. They have 40 days to count and certify the votes, as well as to handle all controversies from election protests and contests, and all counts and recounts.

They can chose to either certify their electoral vote count made according to their laws, within that time limit, or they can chose NOT to certify their electoral vote count. They need not do so by December 12th, but can send the EC votes to congress as late at January 5th. That is the point where it leaves the states hands, and goes into the hands of congress.

And by the 12th amendment congress has sole control over the counting of votes under law. Even to the point that if they reject a states electoral votes, and that brings the top candidates EC vote below 270, they then take it upon themselves according to the rules.

They can actually choose the guy who came in dead last out of the top three vote getters if they so want.

 

[meaner gene]

Surely you know about all the protestors who were bailed out by by nancy and company.

If Trump had any human sympathy, he would bail out the people indited for their activities on January 6th.

But Trump won't spend a dime to get them out of jail.

 

[Lastamender]

Actually the states have an obligation that starts months to years before a federal election, to insure that the count will be correct. They have 40 days to count and certify the votes, as well as to handle all controversies from election protests and contests, and all counts and recounts.

They can chose to either certify their electoral vote count made according to their laws, within that time limit, or they can chose NOT to certify their electoral vote count. They need not do so by December 12th, but can send the EC votes to congress as late at January 5th. That is the point where it leaves the states hands, and goes into the hands of congress.

And by the 12th amendment congress has sole control over the counting of votes under law. Even to the point that if they reject a states electoral votes, and that brings the top candidates EC vote below 270, they then take it upon themselves according to the rules.

They can actually choose the guy who came in dead last out of the top three vote getters if they so want.

Gag me. They cheated every way they could.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

If Trump had any human sympathy, he would bail out the people indited for their activities on January 6th.

But Trump won't spend a dime to get them out of jail.

Ya fucken dumbass!!
They'd have to offer bail before that can happen.

 

[meaner gene]

They attacked federal buildings,blocked the exits and set them on fire knowing there were people in them.
They burned down police precincts. They caused billions in damages and over 40 people were killed.
Go fuck yourself and your false equivalency.

That doesn't meet the definition of insurrection against the government.
Stopping congress from certifying the EC vote under Article 1,2 and the 12th Amendment qualifies as insurrection.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That doesn't meet the definition of insurrection against the government.
Stopping congress from certifying the EC vote under Article 1,2 and the 12th Amendment qualifies as insurrection.

They weren't trying to stop it.
They were protesting it.

 

[Lastamender]

That doesn't meet the definition of insurrection against the government.
Stopping congress from certifying the EC vote under Article 1,2 and the 12th Amendment qualifies as insurrection.

Then why was no one charged with insurrection.

 

[meaner gene]

They weren't trying to stop it.
They were protesting it.

The problem with that theory is that they did stop it.

It's like murder. Even if you didn't intend to shoot someone, but ended up doing so by an intentional act, it's murder, straight and simple.

So you can't claim unintended consequences that they didn't intend to succeed, but did anyway.

 

[meaner gene]

Then why was no one charged with insurrection.

Because proving insurrection requires "intent" which can't be gleaned by video of their actions. They need somebody to reveal conversations they had, which is what the FBI is currently working on.

 

[pknopp]

That is Bull Crap....Quote the sentence or paragraph in the article where denial of attorney's is stated.....

It's right in the wording in the picture.

 

[OKTexas]

NewsMax - The channel for those who can't think their way out of a wet paper bag.

Dodo Doc: There is no criminal charge called "insurrection", asshole.

Insurrection | Definition of Insurrection by Merriam-Webster​

https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › insurr...
Insurrection definition is - an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. How to use insurrection in a sentence.


The facts about Chansley:

Case Number	Name	Charge(s)	Case Documents	Location of Arrest	Case Status	Entry Last Updated*

1:21-cr-3

CHANSLEY, Jacob Anthony (aka, Jacob Angeli)

Civil Disorder; Obsrtuction of an Official Proceeding; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building; Violent Entry and Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building

Chansley - Indictment Chansley - Statement of Facts Chansley - Complaint

ARIZONA, Phoenix

Complaint filed 1/8/21. Indicted 1/11/21. Arraigned 1/29 and pleaded not guilty to all counts. Defendant remains committed.

June 16, 2021

So why haven't they arrested the 50 commies that left TX so prevent and Official Proceeding? Can you say unequal application of the law? AKA a 14th Amendment violation.

.

 

[meaner gene]

It's right in the wording in the picture.

From the article:

They're keeping this trove of over 14,000 hours of surveillance footage captured by the Capitol security system that day … under wraps, away from defense attorneys, away from defendants.
You claimed they didn't have lawyers.

 

[meaner gene]

So why haven't they arrested the 50 commies that left TX so prevent and Official Proceeding? Can you say unequal application of the law? AKA a 14th Amendment violation.

.

Because the federal government only recognizes extradition for crimes. A legislator not showing up to work is not a crime. Or every time Trump went golfing, they could have ordered him returned to the white house.

 

[OKTexas]

Because the federal government only recognizes extradition for crimes. A legislator not showing up to work is not a crime. Or every time Trump went golfing, they could have ordered him returned to the white house.

Conspiracy and acting in concert is a crime. Otherwise there would be very few charges related to 1/6.

.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Just let go of these people who brought shame to republicans everywhere. It's easy. Just say "fuck em", walk away and do your part to make sure it never happens again.

I’m not a republican. I’m an American. That’s currently the opposite of democrat.
I take no ownership in what happened at the capitol.
But I can assure you that it was not insurrection and was likely a setup by creepy, anti-American democrats. The entire continuing straw man/witch hunt is proof.
Every American should be incensed by the gestapo tactics being employed by democrats.

 

[meaner gene]

Conspiracy and acting in concert is a crime. Otherwise there would be very few charges related to 1/6.

.

Whether a strike, a walkout, a work slowdown or even calling in sick, is not a crime. Whether done by an individual or by a group in collaboration.

 

[meaner gene]

Conspiracy and acting in concert is a crime. Otherwise there would be very few charges related to 1/6.

They were charged with conspiring to commit crimes, along with the individual crimes they would be guilty of, with or without cooperation with others.

 

[pknopp]

From the article:

They're keeping this trove of over 14,000 hours of surveillance footage captured by the Capitol security system that day … under wraps, away from defense attorneys, away from defendants.
You claimed they didn't have lawyers.

"They have no ability to meet with lawyers in private".

Lie.

 

[meaner gene]

"They have no ability to meet with lawyers in private".

Lie.

The article doesn't say that. Nor is that likely to be true, as all federal prisons have special rooms set up just for that purpose.



Scott Taylor, a spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, pointed out that inmates and their contacts who use the email system "voluntarily consent to having all system activity monitored and retained." He said that prisoners and their lawyers can communicate through phone, letters or visits, which he said are not monitored by staff.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The problem with that theory is that they did stop it.

It's like murder. Even if you didn't intend to shoot someone, but ended up doing so by an intentional act, it's murder, straight and simple.

So you can't claim unintended consequences that they didn't intend to succeed, but did anyway.

Are you really claiming they stopped it?