Bragg’s GJ cancelled for Wednesday mysteriously

[lantern2814]

I think Mike Cohen really didn't want to testify, President Trump's team of high powered lawyers would make him look pretty fucking stupid, and Bragg may just be showing him mercy.

Cohen has changed his story so many times he may not even remember what he told to who.

 

[lantern2814]

He paid more than $130k to Cohen. But it was for legal fees. It is entirely possible that shitbag Cohen never told Trump about the NDA at all.

But even if he did and even if Trump knew and even if Trump knowingly repaid Cohen for fronting the NDA payment, as you say, none of that is criminal.

And it is a stupid stretch to insist that the NDA payment was a campaign contribution in kind.

Bragg also has to prove it was solely due to Trump running for office that he paid her off. The problem there is that rich people do this all the time. It woulda probably send most of the libs here into shock were they to discover that many of their heroes have banged porn stars and/or have NDAs with one or more women.

 

[Couchpotato]

Bragg also has to prove it was solely due to Trump running for office that he paid her off. The problem there is that rich people do this all the time. It woulda probably send most of the libs here into shock were they to discover that many of their heroes have banged porn stars and/or have NDAs with one or more women.

Are a lot politicians routinely banging porn stars? Maybe they are but that seems a bit far fetched.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Here's a start for the google impaired.

Bragg acussed ofhiding exculperary evidence in Trump indictment - Google Search

Before you take any bets, you may want to read this.

"A defendant in a criminal case in a federal court may be required to stand trial, and his conviction may be sustained, where only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury which indicted him. Pp. 350 U. S. 359-364."

Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956)

Costello v. United States

supreme.justia.com

 

[lantern2814]

Are a lot politicians routinely banging porn stars? Maybe they are but that seems a bit far fetched.

I’m just saying a lot of rich guys pay off women. Be they porn stars or not. Not just politicians. Rob Gronkowski famously had a video years ago where there was a porn Star in his hotel room wearing nothing but his jersey (at 6’9” or so it was almost a full length dress on her).

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Because Gross Prosecutorial Misconduct can lead to disbarment... And potential Criminal Charges...


Intentionally withholding 600 pages of exculpatory evidence from the grand jury is a serious charge... Gross malfeasance of duty..

Oh Gosh! I want to see Bragg disbarred. I hope he likes the unemployment line...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That's not really what I meant but I was a good sport and sifted through the first page of search. I saw these.

"Now it's time to arrest Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg for prosecutorial misconduct after hiding hundreds of pages of exculpatory evidence!" she wrote. "Bragg is on the verge of indicting an innocent former President and top Presidential candidate against the opposing ruling party."

Marjorie Taylor Greene says Alvin Bragg must be arrested ahead of Trump indictment

The congresswoman said Mr Bragg was trying to ‘incite civil unrest’ by indicting Mr Trump

www.google.com

That is MTGs tweet of course which makes the accusation but then gives no references or sources for her claim.

Then I found this.

"The last time the Grand Jury met was on Monday, March 20. Coincidentally, that was the same day a witness told them that 600 pages of “exculpatory evidence” were not handed over to them by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg."

"According to FOX News’ legal expert Gregg Jarrett, Costello told the Grand Jury, “Wait a minute. You don’t have the hundreds of pages I handed over to Alvin Bragg over here? You only have six cherry-picked documents?”

Trump Grand Jury Canceled After Manhattan DA Caught Hiding 600 Pages of Evidence From the Jury

Members of a Manhattan Grand Jury investigating former President Donald Trump were told not to come in

sandrarose.com

I tried to find the above comment on other sources but could only also find it on a site called tiger droppings that made the same claim.

I don't see anywhere where Costello himself has admitted this. I suspect Greg Jarrett is full of shit or the context is hidden...like maybe the GJ didn't have those documents at that moment that Costello was there but have had access to them during the trial.

I will make a deal with you.

If it turns out that Bragg withheld 600 pages of documents AND the documents withheld were legally required for the jury to review and they never had access too them...

I will change my avatar to a Trump pic...not a bad one (like him picking nose or something) but just a regular picture of Trump, for a week. You have my word.

If, however those condition are not met, you will change your avatar to a similar nice picture of Biden for a week.

To be done after the jury decides to indict or not...the decision being irrelevant to our bet of course.

That is how sure I am that this is nonsense.

Do we have a deal?

You talk a lot but never say anything.
There are reports that he did hide exculpatory evidence. It will be discovered if he did.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Before you take any bets, you may want to read this.

"A defendant in a criminal case in a federal court may be required to stand trial, and his conviction may be sustained, where only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury which indicted him. Pp. 350 U. S. 359-364."

Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956)

Costello v. United States

supreme.justia.com

This is a NY case.
The DOJ has already declined to press charges.
Even DEMS are saying it's a waste of money and time.

 

[Couchpotato]

I’m just saying a lot of rich guys pay off women. Be they porn stars or not. Not just politicians. Rob Gronkowski famously had a video years ago where there was a porn Star in his hotel room wearing nothing but his jersey (at 6’9” or so it was almost a full length dress on her).

I would hope that we can find at least a few people with more going on upstairs than Gronk to serve as elected leaders.

 

[Couchpotato]

Before you take any bets, you may want to read this.

"A defendant in a criminal case in a federal court may be required to stand trial, and his conviction may be sustained, where only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury which indicted him. Pp. 350 U. S. 359-364."

Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956)

Costello v. United States

supreme.justia.com

Even if you stipulate that all the facts of the case are true, you’re going to have a hard time getting a conviction.

 

[multivita-man]

His own Grand Jury reportedly believes the same thing the DOJ concluded:

THERE IS NOTHING TO PROSECUTE!

Nah, DA Bragg just needed to spend another day on Amazon trying to find Donny's jump suit size.

 

[lantern2814]

I would hope that we can find at least a few people with more going on upstairs than Gronk to serve as elected leaders.

Considering Fetterman and Biden I’d rather have Gronk.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Bragg exits quietly with his hairy testicles between his legs......

 

[Catsnmeters]

You talk a lot but never say anything.
There are reports that he did hide exculpatory evidence. It will be discovered if he did.

Long post but I was doing your research for you.

So you won't take my bet?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Even if you stipulate that all the facts of the case are true, you’re going to have a hard time getting a conviction.

Not sure. It might be.

I'll accept the outcome, whatever it may be.

 

[Rambunctious]

Bragg has no case... everyone knows it but the libtards....
Buuuuaaaahahahahahaheeheeheehahaheehehehe

 

[0311]

You are correct of course.

Thanks for letting me know.

No Prob. An easy mistake.

 

[0311]

That's not really what I meant but I was a good sport and sifted through the first page of search. I saw these.

"Now it's time to arrest Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg for prosecutorial misconduct after hiding hundreds of pages of exculpatory evidence!" she wrote. "Bragg is on the verge of indicting an innocent former President and top Presidential candidate against the opposing ruling party."

Marjorie Taylor Greene says Alvin Bragg must be arrested ahead of Trump indictment

The congresswoman said Mr Bragg was trying to ‘incite civil unrest’ by indicting Mr Trump

www.google.com

That is MTGs tweet of course which makes the accusation but then gives no references or sources for her claim.

Then I found this.

"The last time the Grand Jury met was on Monday, March 20. Coincidentally, that was the same day a witness told them that 600 pages of “exculpatory evidence” were not handed over to them by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg."

"According to FOX News’ legal expert Gregg Jarrett, Costello told the Grand Jury, “Wait a minute. You don’t have the hundreds of pages I handed over to Alvin Bragg over here? You only have six cherry-picked documents?”

Trump Grand Jury Canceled After Manhattan DA Caught Hiding 600 Pages of Evidence From the Jury

Members of a Manhattan Grand Jury investigating former President Donald Trump were told not to come in

sandrarose.com

I tried to find the above comment on other sources but could only also find it on a site called tiger droppings that made the same claim.

I don't see anywhere where Costello himself has admitted this. I suspect Greg Jarrett is full of shit or the context is hidden...like maybe the GJ didn't have those documents at that moment that Costello was there but have had access to them during the trial.

I will make a deal with you.

If it turns out that Bragg withheld 600 pages of documents AND the documents withheld were legally required for the jury to review and they never had access too them...

I will change my avatar to a Trump pic...not a bad one (like him picking nose or something) but just a regular picture of Trump, for a week. You have my word.

If, however those condition are not met, you will change your avatar to a similar nice picture of Biden for a week.

To be done after the jury decides to indict or not...the decision being irrelevant to our bet of course.

That is how sure I am that this is nonsense.

Do we have a deal?

You will have to wait for hell to freeze over first.

 

[otto105]

/——-/ This just in:
View attachment 768187

Abbott Costello whose house n retainer with the deranged Rudy.


Hilarious

 

[Delldude]

Who on the left is questioning the merits of the case?

Turley, Dershowitz,and a few others.