Boycott Israel

[Hollie]

Why all the excitement? Haven't you heard? BDS is not working.

Why the need for your flailing about when people find a reason to react and object to the virulent Jew hatreds you people espouse?

Its pretty clear that your ideology of hate has causes and affects.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

Indeed, you missed the part about " ... free and critical thinking processes go unhindered,....."

Those attributes typically don't define processes in the Arab-Islamist world.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why all the excitement? Haven't you heard? BDS is not working.

Why the need for your flailing about when people find a reason to react and object to the virulent Jew hatreds you people espouse?

Its pretty clear that your ideology of hate has causes and affects.

Why the "Jew hatred?" Did you play all of your antisemite cards?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

Indeed, you missed the part about " ... free and critical thinking processes go unhindered,....."

Those attributes typically don't define processes in the Arab-Islamist world.

Palestinians are the most diverse and highly educated in the Arab world.

 

[Hollie]

Why all the excitement? Haven't you heard? BDS is not working.

Why the need for your flailing about when people find a reason to react and object to the virulent Jew hatreds you people espouse?

Its pretty clear that your ideology of hate has causes and affects.

Why the "Jew hatred?" Did you play all of your antisemite cards?

Why the cut and paste of your usual slogans. Did you run out of
Press TV YouTube videos? ?

I suppose you typify the lack of "free and critical thinking processes" that plague the Arab-Islamist world.

 

[rylah]

Why all the excitement? Haven't you heard? BDS is not working.

Why the need for your flailing about when people find a reason to react and object to the virulent Jew hatreds you people espouse?

Its pretty clear that your ideology of hate has causes and affects.

Why the "Jew hatred?" Did you play all of your antisemite cards?

You come here posting videos of open calls to murder Jews,
and You still ask those questions?

Some Zebras live in denial about their stripes... Jew haters are not smarter.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

Indeed, you missed the part about " ... free and critical thinking processes go unhindered,....."

Those attributes typically don't define processes in the Arab-Islamist world.

Palestinians are the most diverse and highly educated in the Arab world.

"...... because I say so".


Gaza Strip Religion Facts & Stats

Religions . Muslim (predominantly Sunni) 99.3%, Christian 0.7%

How, umm, diverse.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why all the excitement? Haven't you heard? BDS is not working.

Why the need for your flailing about when people find a reason to react and object to the virulent Jew hatreds you people espouse?

Its pretty clear that your ideology of hate has causes and affects.

Why the "Jew hatred?" Did you play all of your antisemite cards?

You come here posting videos of open calls to murder Jews,
and You still ask those questions?

Some Zebras live in denial about their stripes... Jew haters are not smarter.

Links?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

How is that?

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

How is that?

Like this:

Sermon delivered by 'Atallah Abu Al-Subh, former Hamas minister of culture, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV, April 8, 2011, translation by MEMRI
"Whoever is killed by a Jew receives the reward of two martyrs, because the very thing that the Jews did to the prophets was done to him.

"The Jews are the most despicable and contemptible nation to crawl upon the face of the Earth, because they have displayed hostility to Allah.

"Allah will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come, just like they killed the believers in the hell of this world.

"The Jews kill anyone who believes in Allah. They do not want to see any peace whatsoever on Earth."



How's that?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

Media Removed - No Text

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

How is that?

Like this:

Sermon delivered by 'Atallah Abu Al-Subh, former Hamas minister of culture, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV, April 8, 2011, translation by MEMRI
"Whoever is killed by a Jew receives the reward of two martyrs, because the very thing that the Jews did to the prophets was done to him.

"The Jews are the most despicable and contemptible nation to crawl upon the face of the Earth, because they have displayed hostility to Allah.

"Allah will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come, just like they killed the believers in the hell of this world.

"The Jews kill anyone who believes in Allah. They do not want to see any peace whatsoever on Earth."



How's that?

MEMRI always scraped the bottom of the barrel for their propaganda.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

How is that?

Like this:

Sermon delivered by 'Atallah Abu Al-Subh, former Hamas minister of culture, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV, April 8, 2011, translation by MEMRI
"Whoever is killed by a Jew receives the reward of two martyrs, because the very thing that the Jews did to the prophets was done to him.

"The Jews are the most despicable and contemptible nation to crawl upon the face of the Earth, because they have displayed hostility to Allah.

"Allah will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come, just like they killed the believers in the hell of this world.

"The Jews kill anyone who believes in Allah. They do not want to see any peace whatsoever on Earth."



How's that?

MEMRI always scraped the bottom of the barrel for their propaganda.

Links to fatah facebook pages and exact quotes from your Hamas heroes are propaganda?

You're letting your bruised, tender Islamo-sensibilities interfere with rational thought processes.

 

[rylah]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

To force entry into an already existing diverse culture often results in alienation.

----------------------------------------- In Brief -----------------------------------------​

• Decades of research by organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers show that socially diverse groups (that is, those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.
• It seems obvious that a group of people with diverse individual expertise would be better than a homogeneous group at solving complex, nonroutine problems. It is less obvious that social diversity should work in the same way—yet the science shows that it does.
• This is not only because people with different backgrounds bring new information. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, to anticipate alternative viewpoints and to expect that reaching consensus will take effort.

By Katherine W. Phillips - October 1, 2014
أعرض هذا باللغة العربية
Scientific American - Politics and Ethics

(COMMENT)

In any group as diverse as Jewish culture, in which the free and critical thinking processes go unhindered, there is a certain inevitability that differences in opinion will occur. Does this mean the culture is torn apart? (RHETORICAL) No!

Most Respectfully,
R

Then why is the inclusion of Palestinians a bad thing?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip represent an unacceptable threat to Israeli cutlture (not necessarily limited to the Jewish Culture).

"Jihad in Palestine is not terrorism. Jihad in Palestine is a sacred duty."
— Yusef Rizka, Representative of HAMAS

Most Respectfully,
R

How is that?

Like this:

Sermon delivered by 'Atallah Abu Al-Subh, former Hamas minister of culture, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV, April 8, 2011, translation by MEMRI
"Whoever is killed by a Jew receives the reward of two martyrs, because the very thing that the Jews did to the prophets was done to him.

"The Jews are the most despicable and contemptible nation to crawl upon the face of the Earth, because they have displayed hostility to Allah.

"Allah will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come, just like they killed the believers in the hell of this world.

"The Jews kill anyone who believes in Allah. They do not want to see any peace whatsoever on Earth."



How's that?

MEMRI always scraped the bottom of the barrel for their propaganda.

Think again, MEMRI translates virtually all Arab media.

So it's either You considering all media coming from Arab stations as the "barrel bottom" ...or You're coming to senses, which is unlikely.



Probably just another case of You making a fool of Yourself without even understanding.

 

[Sixties Fan]

After Work Visa Cancelled, HRW Falsely Denies BDS and Demonization Promotion

 

[Sixties Fan]

ALERT: Anti-Israel coordinating group to launch municipal-level campaigns against Israel in June

 

[Sixties Fan]

When the controversy over antisemitism and Tamika Mallory first flared up, I noted that it had one very interesting characteristic: it wasn't about Israel. This is somewhat uncommon in left-of-center antisemitism disputes, and one could almost hear the gears grinding in Mallory's would-be defenders. So used to having "criticism of Israel isn't antisemitic" as their "get-out-of-talking-about-antisemitism-free" card, they were left almost dumbstruck.

Mallory has been notoriously resistant to any serious reckoning with antisemitic sentiment on her part. She views herself as the victim here, and so she's seemingly cast about for new avenues to antagonize her Jewish tormentors. First it was going after the ADL. Now, as part of a "fact-finding" trip to Israel, it's blaming Netanyahu for Trump's border wall and Muslim ban.

(full article online)

The Debate Link: Tamika Mallory's Israel Rehabilitation Tour

 

[Sixties Fan]

It seems the Guardian wants to shut down all social and cultural life in Israel. Last week it published an article which accused the Jewish state of “sportswashing” its reputation by hosting the Giro d’Italia‘s first leg, irrespective of the fact that Israel had obviously been invited to host it!

Implicit in the accusation of “sportswashing” is the historical antisemitic trope of “dishonest Jews” manipulating the world via unethical business practice.

This antisemitic trope has reared its ugly head yet again today with the Guardian publishing a letter by artists. The letter is about the Seret International Film Festival currently underway in London. The letter states:
(vide online)

Again there’s the implicit notion of “dishonest Jews” manipulating others in an unethical manner.

The artists then use Israel’s dealing of the current unrest in Gaza to “call on our cinema, media and cultural institutions to uphold basic ethical standards: they should refuse to provide platforms for national celebrations sponsored by a regime that is guilty of systematic and large-scale human rights violations.”

This is a call for a racist boycott. The boycott, divestment and sanctions movement (BDS) is simply a call for the destruction of the Jewish state (mainly via the so-called Palestinian “right of return”). In 2014 the Tricycle Theatre cancelled the Jewish Film Festival in response to similar pressure but London’s Jewish community protested outside. The Tricycle eventually apologised.

The artists in this letter claim “large numbers of unarmed protesters in Gaza are killed or maimed with impunity by Israeli snipers”. However, it seems, 80% of those killed in the recent Gaza riots have been terrorists. And the two “journalists” cited in the letter who died, Yaser Murtaja and Ahmed Abu Hussein, seem to have had links to terrorist groups; Murtaja with Hamas and Abu Hussein with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

(full article online)

Guardian publishes antisemitic letter which calls for a boycott of Israel.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The National Bureau for Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism on Tuesday accused the cosignatories of “trying to discriminate against the only Jewish democratic state” while “staying blind, deaf, and mute when it comes to Palestinian anti-Semitic culture in which theaters, cinemas, and music are used to propagate this hatred in schools” in the West Bank and Gaza.

In addition to Godard, the maker of “Breathless,” the petition also was signed by Eyal Sivan, an Israel-born director who in 2001, amid anti-Semitic assaults in France, said that “Jewish Agency agents have one way of increasing aliyah: Burning synagogues.” He also said Jews in France were paying the price for “the colonial and murderous situation that has prevailed for more than fifty years in Israel-Palestine.”

The philosopher Alain Finkielkraut called Sivan a “Jewish anti-Semite,” leading the director to sue Finkielkraut for libel. Sivan lost the trial. In 2013, Eyal said that “Zionism runs France.”

Godard has faced accusations of anti-Semitism in France. He has denied this allegation, stating his father was anti-Semitic but he is merely anti-Zionist.

Godard worked in 1970 on a film titled “Until Victory,” depicting the “Palestinian struggle for independence,” partially bankrolled by the Arab League. It was never completed. It features alternating images of former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir and Adolf Hitler.

(full article online)

French New Wave pioneer Jean-Luc Godard joins Israel cinema boycott

 

[Sixties Fan]

Pro-Palestinian US students slam Muslim chaplain for defending campus Hillel