Boycott Israel

[Toddsterpatriot]

[ Well, well, well...... Arabs are NOT boycotting America, and probably not Israel, either ]


He called on Arab countries not to agree to the American administration's peace plan which will be presented soon, to withdraw their investments from the U.S., to boycott American products, and to adhere to previous summit resolutions that cut off ties with any country that recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

PLO declares economic war on the United States

If we stop handing them money, they'll stop buying our stuff?

 

[Sixties Fan]

http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Exclusive-PayPal-closes-second-illegal-French-BDS-account-543643

 

[Sixties Fan]

Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers: California Democrats for Peace and Justice

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Fatah boycotts Hamas.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Nearly two dozen Spanish municipalities rescind or suspend pro-BDS measures against the State of Israel.

(full article online)

Spanish municipalities drop Israel boycott policies

 

[Sixties Fan]

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ If they are willing to do without American money, I would say......yes ]

Palestinians call for closure of US mission in Palestine

 

[Sixties Fan]

China’s bike-sharing titans roll into Startup Nation

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

If they do not, what are they doing listening to Abbas and other leaders who tell them to attack Jews all the time?

I would say that most Palestinians take the PA seriously. Just look at the Media, social networks, etc.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

If they do not, what are they doing listening to Abbas and other leaders who tell them to attack Jews all the time?

I would say that most Palestinians take the PA seriously. Just look at the Media, social networks, etc.

Post something where Palestinians mention Abbas or the PA.

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

If they do not, what are they doing listening to Abbas and other leaders who tell them to attack Jews all the time?

I would say that most Palestinians take the PA seriously. Just look at the Media, social networks, etc.

Post something where Palestinians mention Abbas or the PA.

You jest. Who put the curriculum they have in their schools?
On their television shows, movies, films, online?

Please, dare to say that neither the PA nor Abbas have anything to do with it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

Palestinians to U.N. states: ‘Don’t let settlers enter your country’

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

If they do not, what are they doing listening to Abbas and other leaders who tell them to attack Jews all the time?

I would say that most Palestinians take the PA seriously. Just look at the Media, social networks, etc.

Post something where Palestinians mention Abbas or the PA.

You jest. Who put the curriculum they have in their schools?
On their television shows, movies, films, online?

Please, dare to say that neither the PA nor Abbas have anything to do with it.

Now you are just deflecting.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ et al,

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

✪ Israeli-Jordanian Armistice Lines: Article VI -11: The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in this article and in article V shall be subject to such rectification as may be agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, and all such rectifications shall have the same force and effect as if they had been incorporated in full in this General Armistice Agreement.

✪ Israeli-Egyptian Armistice Lines: Article V - 2: The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.​

In both Armistice Agreements, the questions on the international boundaries are settled. Each Armistice Agreement was settled at the conclusion of the Peace Treaty.

✪ Jordan: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.

✪ Egypt: This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an Armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved, except as provided in paragraph 3 of this Article.​

(COMMENT)

POINT #1:

As stated, the Armistice Lines of which the PA Foreign Minister is referring, were only to remain in force until a peaceful settlement. And the Armistice Agreements were military agreements concluded by the military representatives.​

POINT #2:

There was no Palestinian Authority in 1967; thus there was no agreement between the Arab Palestinians in 1949 and not treaty asked for or establish by any body resembling the Palestinian Authority. In fact, even the Arab League had not recognized any form of Arab-Palestinian Leadership until the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference ⇒ Resolution on Palestine, Rabat, Morocco 28 October 1974:​

To affirm the right of the Palestinian people to establish an independent national authority under the command of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated. This authority, once it is established, shall enjoy the support of the Arab states in all fields and at all levels;​

And, the PLO did not declare independence until mid-November 1988, well after the Jordanians politically abandon the West Bank and Jerusalem. • Declaration of Independence A/43/827-S/20278 of 18 November 1988 •​

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to chuckle at the Arab Palestinians; especially Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik. The pre-1967 Borders do not exist; they were never borders. They were Armistice Lines.

Does anyone take the PA seriously? The Palestinians don't.

If they do not, what are they doing listening to Abbas and other leaders who tell them to attack Jews all the time?

I would say that most Palestinians take the PA seriously. Just look at the Media, social networks, etc.

Post something where Palestinians mention Abbas or the PA.

You jest. Who put the curriculum they have in their schools?
On their television shows, movies, films, online?

Please, dare to say that neither the PA nor Abbas have anything to do with it.

Now you are just deflecting.

Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

4000 posts!!!!

And still no nation of Palestine..........