Both America and Islamic terrorists need each other

[racialreality9]

The American military needs to justify its budget after the end of the Cold War, and the Muslims need a great enemy to give meaning to their lives.

As such, you are going to feed off each other until you are all destroyed. I am right about this.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Cold War never ended.

 

[MisterBeale]

The American military needs to justify its budget after the end of the Cold War, and the Muslims need a great enemy to give meaning to their lives.

As such, you are going to feed off each other until you are all destroyed. I am right about this.

I couldn't agree more.

 

[gipper]

The American military needs to justify its budget after the end of the Cold War, and the Muslims need a great enemy to give meaning to their lives.

As such, you are going to feed off each other until you are all destroyed. I am right about this.

It seems the Neocons and others in the American warmongering class are not satisfied with just prolonging the Islamic terrorism threat. Now they are working full time on making war with Russia and China too.

 

[Stratford57]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 500 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

 

[gipper]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 50 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

View attachment 91593

When Trump said Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS, he was right. They were actively arming the rebels in Syria when ambassador Stevens was sacrificed. They were gun running from Libya to Turkey. The terrible deaths in Syria is partially the responsibility of these two lying fools. The war has been prolonged because the US is arming the rebels. Obama wants Assad gone and he apparently does not care about the horrible consequences of his stupid policy.

 

[Stratford57]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 50 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

View attachment 91593

When Trump said Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS, he was right. They were actively arming the rebels in Syria when ambassador Stevens was sacrificed. They were gun running from Libya to Turkey. The terrible deaths in Syria is partially the responsibility of these two lying fools. The war has been prolonged because the US is arming the rebels. Obama wants Assad gone and he apparently does not care about the horrible consequences of his stupid policy.

Putin: When I hear someone say r that president [Assad] must resign, and hear that from outside the country rather than from inside, I get a lot of questions. I am pretty sure and my confidence is based on the events of the last decade, in particular the attempts to bring democracy to Iraq or Lebanon; we see what they have come to – virtually to the collapse of statehood and the rise in terrorism.

Where in Libya do you see elements of democracy? They might emerge someday, and I really hope they do. Or take the on-going civil war in Iraq. What is going to happen to Iraq as a state in the future? So far these are just difficult questions.

Same thing with Syria. When we hear that Assad must step down (for some reason some people from outside believe so), I have a question: what will the result be? And in general, is this in line with international law? Where will this lead to? Isn't it better to remain patient and promote the changes in the structure of the society itself and, by doing so, wait for the changes to happen naturally within the country.

Interview to Bloomberg

 

[gipper]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 50 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

View attachment 91593

When Trump said Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS, he was right. They were actively arming the rebels in Syria when ambassador Stevens was sacrificed. They were gun running from Libya to Turkey. The terrible deaths in Syria is partially the responsibility of these two lying fools. The war has been prolonged because the US is arming the rebels. Obama wants Assad gone and he apparently does not care about the horrible consequences of his stupid policy.

Putin: When I hear someone say r that president [Assad] must resign, and hear that from outside the country rather than from inside, I get a lot of questions. I am pretty sure and my confidence is based on the events of the last decade, in particular the attempts to bring democracy to Iraq or Lebanon; we see what they have come to – virtually to the collapse of statehood and the rise in terrorism.

Where in Libya do you see elements of democracy? They might emerge someday, and I really hope they do. Or take the on-going civil war in Iraq. What is going to happen to Iraq as a state in the future? So far these are just difficult questions.

Same thing with Syria. When we hear that Assad must step down (for some reason some people from outside believe so), I have a question: what will the result be? And in general, is this in line with international law? Where will this lead to? Isn't it better to remain patient and promote the changes in the structure of the society itself and, by doing so, wait for the changes to happen naturally within the country.

Interview to Bloomberg

One would think after the horrendous failure of American policy in Iran and Iraq, the American political class would have learned something. I suspect this failed policy is exactly what they want. They want MORE terrorism because they know it enriches and empowers them.

 

[Stratford57]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 50 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

View attachment 91593

When Trump said Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS, he was right. They were actively arming the rebels in Syria when ambassador Stevens was sacrificed. They were gun running from Libya to Turkey. The terrible deaths in Syria is partially the responsibility of these two lying fools. The war has been prolonged because the US is arming the rebels. Obama wants Assad gone and he apparently does not care about the horrible consequences of his stupid policy.

Putin: When I hear someone say r that president [Assad] must resign, and hear that from outside the country rather than from inside, I get a lot of questions. I am pretty sure and my confidence is based on the events of the last decade, in particular the attempts to bring democracy to Iraq or Lebanon; we see what they have come to – virtually to the collapse of statehood and the rise in terrorism.

Where in Libya do you see elements of democracy? They might emerge someday, and I really hope they do. Or take the on-going civil war in Iraq. What is going to happen to Iraq as a state in the future? So far these are just difficult questions.

Same thing with Syria. When we hear that Assad must step down (for some reason some people from outside believe so), I have a question: what will the result be? And in general, is this in line with international law? Where will this lead to? Isn't it better to remain patient and promote the changes in the structure of the society itself and, by doing so, wait for the changes to happen naturally within the country.

Interview to Bloomberg

One would think after the horrendous failure of American policy in Iran and Iraq, the American political class would have learned something. I suspect this failed policy is exactly what they want. They want MORE terrorism because they know it enriches and empowers them.

Obama and Clinton never have been independent, they have bosses (Soros, Establishment, Globalists,....) telling them what to do. Trump won't take any orders from them, that's why they are so scared American people will elect him. Trump is the worst nightmare of all Neocons, Globalists and those, who want to keep their world power no matter how many lives it costs.

Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

US absolutely refuses to address the prime sponsors of al-Qaeda and ISIS in the Middle East. And that’s countries like Saudi Arabia, which has been backing extremists in Syria since 2011. If the US hadn’t been attempting to destabilize the Syrian government all these years - which has been fighting against ISIS and al-Qaeda - then maybe they would not have the strong foothold they have in the country. You can’t fight ISIS and fight the enemies of ISIS at the same time. It makes absolutely no sense.

We were told by President Obama, Hillary Clinton and all the people in the White House that if we only overthrew Gaddafi in Libya - democracy would break out. Meanwhile, we are aligning ourselves with what became ISIS in Benghazi and lo and behold in the chaos that followed the US intervention in Libya, ISIS and other extremists groups broke out. The same was true in Iraq. That was a precedent that was simply ignored because the interventionists refuse to learn from their mistakes, they continue to repeat them and sadly no one looks at them as discredited as they should be.

‘US fighting ISIS and its enemies at the same time, which makes no sense’

US airstrikes on Syrian troops were ‘intentional,’ lasted nearly 1 hour – Assad to AP

 

[gipper]

September 17:
The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, said. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to rebels end up with terrorists.

In response to a recent State Department release which said the US had not been supporting terrorists, but some of its allies could have been, Todenhofer said, “maybe there were allies in between. But everybody knows that they are using allies and they are allowing allies... It doesn’t matter if a TOW rocket or a TOW missile, which is an American missile, comes [to terrorists] from another group.”

Todenhofer said that when a terrorist group wants the weapons which are supplied to rebels it changes its name and from that point it belongs to the so-called ’moderate opposition.’

“In a certain way he [the Jabhat al-Nusra commander] is repeating what Pentagon said four years ago,” he stated. “They are trying to get rid of Assad with the help of the rebels,” the journalist concluded.

In the interview the Jabhat al-Nusra unit commander Abu Al Ezz said that US weapons are being delivered to the terrorist group by governments that Washington supports and American instructors have been providing instruction on how to use them. “Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support,” he said.

He also echoed claims made by Moscow and the Syrian government that the militants were using the Syrian ceasefire, agreed on by Russia and US on September 9, to prepare for a new offensive. “We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will regroup our groups. We will carry out the next overwhelming attack against the regime in a few days,” he said.

‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German journo to RT
Watch the video^, you'll learn a lot of interesting things!
---------
Jurgen Todenhofer: In Iraq the Saddam's overthrowing cost 1 million lives; in Libya Qaddafi's overthrowing cost 50 thousand lives; in Syria for the sake of Assad's overthrowing 400 thousand people have been already killed. I'd like to ask: how many innocent people have to be killed to overthrow "the dictator"? This is a moral question, which Washington has to answer.
---------
Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).

Washington argues that because its "moderates" refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!

George W. Bush famously said, "either you're with us, or you are with the terrorists." But what happens when Washington itself is "with the terrorists"?

In Kerry's Own Words: Syria Prohibited from Attacking al-Qaeda

View attachment 91593

When Trump said Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS, he was right. They were actively arming the rebels in Syria when ambassador Stevens was sacrificed. They were gun running from Libya to Turkey. The terrible deaths in Syria is partially the responsibility of these two lying fools. The war has been prolonged because the US is arming the rebels. Obama wants Assad gone and he apparently does not care about the horrible consequences of his stupid policy.

Putin: When I hear someone say r that president [Assad] must resign, and hear that from outside the country rather than from inside, I get a lot of questions. I am pretty sure and my confidence is based on the events of the last decade, in particular the attempts to bring democracy to Iraq or Lebanon; we see what they have come to – virtually to the collapse of statehood and the rise in terrorism.

Where in Libya do you see elements of democracy? They might emerge someday, and I really hope they do. Or take the on-going civil war in Iraq. What is going to happen to Iraq as a state in the future? So far these are just difficult questions.

Same thing with Syria. When we hear that Assad must step down (for some reason some people from outside believe so), I have a question: what will the result be? And in general, is this in line with international law? Where will this lead to? Isn't it better to remain patient and promote the changes in the structure of the society itself and, by doing so, wait for the changes to happen naturally within the country.

Interview to Bloomberg

One would think after the horrendous failure of American policy in Iran and Iraq, the American political class would have learned something. I suspect this failed policy is exactly what they want. They want MORE terrorism because they know it enriches and empowers them.

Obama and Clinton never have been independent, they have bosses (Soros, Establishment, Globalists,....) telling them what to do. Trump won't take any orders from them, that's why they are so scared American people will elect him. Trump is the worst nightmare of all Neocons, Globalists and those, who want to keep their world power no matter how many lives it costs.

Daniel McAdams is Executive Director of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity:

US absolutely refuses to address the prime sponsors of al-Qaeda and ISIS in the Middle East. And that’s countries like Saudi Arabia, which has been backing extremists in Syria since 2011. If the US hadn’t been attempting to destabilize the Syrian government all these years - which has been fighting against ISIS and al-Qaeda - then maybe they would not have the strong foothold they have in the country. You can’t fight ISIS and fight the enemies of ISIS at the same time. It makes absolutely no sense.

We were told by President Obama, Hillary Clinton and all the people in the White House that if we only overthrew Gaddafi in Libya - democracy would break out. Meanwhile, we are aligning ourselves with what became ISIS in Benghazi and lo and behold in the chaos that followed the US intervention in Libya, ISIS and other extremists groups broke out. The same was true in Iraq. That was a precedent that was simply ignored because the interventionists refuse to learn from their mistakes, they continue to repeat them and sadly no one looks at them as discredited as they should be.

‘US fighting ISIS and its enemies at the same time, which makes no sense’

US airstrikes on Syrian troops were ‘intentional,’ lasted nearly 1 hour – Assad to AP

Sadly the American public is completely clueless to what is REALLY going on in the Middle East. The big American media misinforms the American people. Statism and leftism rule the day.

If we had a real democratic republic, Obama would have been impeached and removed for his corrupt actions in Syria (and so many other corrupt actions). Sadly this is nothing new as nearly all our presidents since Stalin's Stooge, were crooks.

 

[Stratford57]

I wish we all see a day when an independent Military Tribunal judges Obama, Clinton, Soros, Bush, Kerry, Nuland &Co as war criminals. Then I''l believe, there is justice in this world.

 

[gipper]

I wish we all see a day when an independent Military Tribunal judges Obama, Clinton, Soros, Bush, Kerry, Nuland &Co as war criminals. Then I''l believe, there is justice in this world.

Agreed.

Imagine how that would scare the shit out of the Ameircan political class. It would greatly limit the power of future American politicians.

 

[Stratford57]

8 hours ago, Lavrov’s Interview to BBC

The US is keeping jihadist group al-Nusra for a “Plan B”, potentially to overthrow Syrian President Assad, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with the BBC.

Speaking to the British outlet about increased violence in Syria, including in Aleppo, Lavrov said that Washington has still not delivered on its promise to persuade US-backed rebels to separate from Jabhat al-Nusra jihadists.

The separation of so-called “moderate” anti-government fighters from terrorist groups is one of the cornerstones of the Russia-US brokered peace deal for Syria.

Lavrov’s statement came on the first anniversary of the Russian anti-ISIS air campaign at the request of President Assad. On September 25 the US envoy to the UN, Samantha Power, called Russia’s actions in Syria “barbarism,” with Lavrov saying such rhetoric is“unacceptable.” When questioned about alleged civilian casualties caused by Russian strikes in Aleppo, Lavrov said that there was “no meaningful proof.”

"We are not using any munition which is prohibited by the United Nations," he added.

Instead Lavrov noted that the West including the US is remaining silent over terrorist re-supplies in the city during the humanitarian pauses agreed between Moscow and Washington."Every time these pauses have been used by Nusra to get from abroad more fighters, more ammunition and more weapons,”the official said.

Lavrov countered that it’s the militants “controlled by al-Nusra” who jeopardize peace efforts. The terrorists are “shielding themselves with other armed groups” in order not to be attacked, Lavrov noted, stressing that Washington needs to do more to persuade moderate forces to dodge any cooperation with Jihadists.

While speaking with Lavrov the BBC claimed that there is “evidence”proving that the attack involved the Russian military. The official countered that he “would like to see that evidence,” adding that one should wait for the results of the investigation launched by the UN.

US ‘spare Nusra for plan B’ to change regime in Syria – Lavrov

Russia's Sergei Lavrov: BBC interview in full - BBC News

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

The American military needs to justify its budget after the end of the Cold War, and the Muslims need a great enemy to give meaning to their lives.

As such, you are going to feed off each other until you are all destroyed. I am right about this.

So what your saying is that if we just leave the terrorist alone they won't kill us anymore ? Would you be interested in cheap bridges because I'm having a blowout sale.

I hate to bust your bubble but the very ideology that the Islamic terrorist subscribe to makes anyone who doesn't believe as they do an enemy. Unless your one of those who capitulates.