Boston’s Mayor Wu: “Every single human being has the legal right to come to the United States and seek shelter”

[WEATHER53]

Where is this right documented?

In his wishes. We can’t even confer legal rights to non citizens

 

[drudge X]

In his wishes. We can’t even confer legal rights to non citizens

Under Democrats, illegal aliens and criminals have more rights than law abiding citizens. I don’t believe any country aside from the US would betray fellow citizens like Democrats have been doing for a decade.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Let's see your argument why it is.

Giving people shelter improves their well being.

Improving someone's well being is, itself, moral.

Therefore giving people shelter is moral.

What's sad is that adults exist who need to have this spelled out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Dude that would require lots of laws to be scrubbed....good luck with that

No, allowing people to apply for asylum is well established in our laws already.

The fat orange rapist had to change the existing rules to throw them out.

 

[drudge X]

No, allowing people to apply for asylum is well established in our laws already.

The fat orange rapist had to change the existing rules to throw them out.

Nope. That’s because when the asylum is rejected, 1) they refused to leave , 2) Democrats will prevent deportation.

 

[Lockback]

Wu is probably a Chinese spy.

Literally.
They've clearly taken over much of the Democrat Party.
What's so disturbing to me isn't just that Democrat leaders are spouting this incredibly stupid and highly dangerous nonsense.
It's that people actually vote for these morons. 1-party rule and look at where it's getting us.

 

[Lockback]

No, allowing people to apply for asylum is well established in our laws already.

The fat orange rapist had to change the existing rules to throw them out.

You're despicably stupid.

 

[Unkotare]

Wu is probably a Chinese spy.

Her parents are Taiwanese immigrants, not Chinese.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Soon, all the Democrats will spout the same nonsense. And far too many Americans will nod in agreement.

When the far left took over the teachers colleges decades ago, the was their aim.

What is she basing this on? Where is that in the Constitution? What lies between her ears.

 

[Lockback]

What is she basing this on? Where is that in the Constitution? What lies between her ears.

I'm guessing here but I'll bet she got that from President Xi of Communist China. She probably has his personal cell phone number.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Her parents are Taiwanese immigrants, not Chinese.

Because there are no Chinese spies in Taiwan.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is she basing this on? Where is that in the Constitution? What lies between her ears.

She is speaking of what should be. Just as I think every human has a right to Healthcare and food and shelter.

 

[Lockback]

She is speaking of what should be. Just as I think every human has a right to Healthcare and food and shelter.

Well, that's a really nice thought. And completely absurd. You're a Communist. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

[LeftofLeft]

She is speaking of what should be. Just as I think every human has a right to Healthcare and food and shelter.

She is speaking Open Borders just as you.

 

[fncceo]

I would love to see your attempt at arguing why that's morally incorrect.

So I can laugh hysterically.

It is morally wrong because it depends on spurious assumptions.

There is no moral obligation for the American taxpayer to assume the cost of shelter for 7.8 Billion potential refugees.

Providing shelter for any potential refugee comes at a cost that would adversely impact the current citizens whom the government has a moral obligation to protect which supersedes the needs of the rest of the world.

The argument for the entire world to come to America to seek shelter makes the assumption that every person is entitled to shelter provide by someone who has no fault in creating the circumstances of those seeking shelter.

The wording of the the claim states that people have the right to come here, and then seek shelter. It assumes they have the right to enter America before being assessed to their need. It provides Prima Facia claims that every person in the world is entitled to taxpayer funded shelter without being presented with evidence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She is speaking Open Borders just as you.

To a degree, yes. But not wide open borders. Come to ports of entry. And expand asylum eligibility and protected groups.

It still wouldn't give asylum to 100% of those who apply.

 

[Lockback]

Because there are no Chinese spies in Taiwan.

Oh, no. None.

 

[LeftofLeft]

To a degree, yes. But not wide open borders. Come to ports of entry. And expand asylum eligibility and protected groups.

It still wouldn't give asylum to 100% of those who apply.

How is that not the case now? Why is there a need for asylum eligibility and who and what are “protected groups”?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Soon, all the Democrats will spout the same nonsense. And far too many Americans will nod in agreement.

When the far left took over the teachers colleges decades ago, the was their aim.

Hmm, wonder if that would include 50,000 taliban, would she think they have a right as well?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Okay.

But people do have the right to come here and to seek asylum.

We even wrote it down.

If it’s actual asylum, yes