Your answer is funny.
Yes, the right want "national unity", they have flags and songs and pledges of allegiance and all of that. But they want "national unity" on their terms and ONLY on their terms.
"Either you're with us, or against us", it's that simple. If a right winger wants to spend lots of money to build a wall, then anyone who opposes that wall is "anti-American". If the right winger wants to ban gay marriage then you're "anti-American" if you oppose that ban.
Really it's simple bullying.
I'm on the left and I believe in national unity. But I also believe in freedom, equality and rights. I think life is a balance, when "national unity" becomes too much, then people's freedoms get trampled on, then what's the point of "national unity"?
You don't want "national unity" where everyone gets one person, one vote. All of a sudden this freedom to decide how the country is run gets called "mob rule".
The problem with your arguments is that you'll argue one thing to get what you want here, and oppose that very same argument elsewhere to get what you want there.
Funny how you seem to think having national unity and believing in freedom, equality, and rights cannot go together.
You’re either “with us or against us” is exactly how the left wing radicals operate, yet you never denounce them.
Do you believe in having national borders and border control? If yes, then why get so upset over having a better wall to keep illegals out?
When has the right ever wanted to “ban” gay marriage? Gay marriage is legal in all states. What the radicals demand is that the government recognize it and thus force everyone eles to recognize it by fiat.
The rest of your arguement is nonsensical as usual, claiming I am somehow against one person one vote.
As far as bullying goes, no one has that down like the radical left. You’re either with their insane PC politics, or you’re a “racist” or a “transphobe”, and they’ll do everything to destroy your life.
Do I need to come on here and denounce everyone I think needs denouncing? Do I need to denounce left wing radicals to you? That's be pointless, wouldn't it?
So, national unity and freedom, equality and rights go together? No, almost never. Why? Because national unity is about forcing people to do things, whereas freedom, equality and rights are about not forcing people to do things. Kind of slight contradiction there.
I'm not upset about having borders. I'm just a bit miffed about why Trump thinks an expensive wall is necessary when there are cheaper and BETTER options.
The right is all for saving money, except when they're the ones who want to spend it. Hence why they never come out of office having reduced anything to do with money.
When has the right ever wanted to ban gay marriage? Hmmm.... always. Well, not every single person in the right, but many, most.
Do you need me to prove it.
The 13 states that still ban same-sex marriage - CNN
Fri February 13, 2015
"
The 13 states that still ban same-sex marriage"
Shall we have a bet before go look that these'll all be right wing states?
Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee.
Every single one of these states voted for Trump. A surprise? No.
In 2015 support for gay marriage rose to 60%, which means 40% of people oppose it. So when did the right want to ban gay marriage? Well, today, yesterday, the day before, last year, last decade, last century. You know. Always.
Here's a map, the bluer it is, the more support. Red means more than 50% oppose it. Oh, two right wing states.
Without judges enforcing the constitution, it wouldn't have happened in a lot of states, especially some of the ones I showed before.
You call democracy where everyone's vote is EQUAL (remember we're talking equality here) "mob rule".
I mean, I even quoted you saying it. So, no, I know you don't support proper democracy, because YOU'VE SAID IT.
I'm not the radical left and I'm not going to support them either. But for you to come on here and try and deflect by saying "the radical left does this that and the other" instead of looking at EVERYONE who does this that and the other, is absurd.