Boston bomber refusing to talk after reading of Miranda rights-Thanks liberals

[CMike]

Miranda warning then silence from bombing suspect - Road Runner

 

[jon_berzerk]

Miranda warning then silence from bombing suspect - Road Runner

he already told the investigators

that he and his brother acted alone

---LOL

 

[bodecea]

Miranda warning then silence from bombing suspect - Road Runner

Refusing to talk?

Might it be because his voice box was blown out?

 

[Freewill]

I am not sure what he was told but it didn't matter if he were mirandized or not. All it meant was that he could be questioned without a lawyer and what he said could be used in court. Just because a person is mirandized does not mean they are forced to talk.

 

[martybegan]

They don't need the pre miranda confession to convict his ass, they have plenty of other evidence. They needed to talk to him to determine if he was part of a cell, or just a lone wolf type.

Once they figured these guys acted alone, the mirandized him, and now anything he says will be used against him at the criminal trial.

 

[jon_berzerk]

They don't need the pre miranda confession to convict his ass, they have plenty of other evidence. They needed to talk to him to determine if he was part of a cell, or just a lone wolf type.

Once they figured these guys acted alone, the mirandized him, and now anything he says will be used against him at the criminal trial.

homeland security gave him the all clear

after he told them they acted alone

its been in the news

--LOL

 

[Freewill]

They don't need the pre miranda confession to convict his ass, they have plenty of other evidence. They needed to talk to him to determine if he was part of a cell, or just a lone wolf type.

Once they figured these guys acted alone, the mirandized him, and now anything he says will be used against him at the criminal trial.

homeland security gave him the all clear

after he told them they acted alone

its been in the news

--LOL

Homeland security?

 

[Rocko]

I am not sure what he was told but it didn't matter if he were mirandized or not. All it meant was that he could be questioned without a lawyer and what he said could be used in court. Just because a person is mirandized does not mean they are forced to talk.

If they're not mirandized you can use interrofation techniques to try and make them talk.

 

[jon_berzerk]

They don't need the pre miranda confession to convict his ass, they have plenty of other evidence. They needed to talk to him to determine if he was part of a cell, or just a lone wolf type.

Once they figured these guys acted alone, the mirandized him, and now anything he says will be used against him at the criminal trial.

homeland security gave him the all clear

after he told them they acted alone

its been in the news

--LOL

Homeland security?

yes

plus they cleared the older brother some time back

after Russia gave us the heads up on this guy

 

[candycorn]

You're welcome. Anytime.

 

[Dutch]

He was a US citizen. So cons are in favor of Eliminating certain segments of the Bill of Rights but the second amendment is off limits?

 

[depotoo]

He was a US citizen. So cons are in favor of Eliminating certain segments of the Bill of Rights but the second amendment is off limits?

so I guess you find fault with the drone strike on the American citizen then?

 

[CMike]

It's not about a conviction.

It's about getting intelligence. He is a combatant. He shouldn't have miranda rights (the right to remain silent)

 

[blackcherry]

silence_from_bombing_suspect]Miranda warning then silence from bombing suspect - Road Runner[/url]

First catch the real bombers then worry about the lovely Miranda .

 

[Mad Scientist]

OP hates the 5th Amendment.

 

[CMike]

Doesn't apply to unlawful combatants.

 

[Sallow]

Miranda warning then silence from bombing suspect - Road Runner

So it's okay to break the law as long it's against people you don't like?

By the way..anything he's says before he's informed of his rights, can't be used in a court of law.

 

[Sallow]

Doesn't apply to unlawful combatants.

That distinction is an abomination all people that are really interested in liberty and freed should find abhorrent.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Doesn't apply to unlawful combatants.

Show us where the guys were designated as "Enemy Combatants". An idiot Politician tried that shit and was beat down rather quickly.

 

[ClosedCaption]

He was a US citizen. So cons are in favor of Eliminating certain segments of the Bill of Rights but the second amendment is off limits?

they are for all sorts of things when they're scared