Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,964
- 1,415
So why do you assume he hasn't?So why hasn’t Trump made any progress in the courts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why do you assume he hasn't?So why hasn’t Trump made any progress in the courts?
Whataboutisms don’t work....Thats a good questionSo why hasn’t Trump made any progress in the courts?
why was Dred Scott denied his freedom since judges never err?
Dred Scott - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Because he hasn’t.So why do you assume he hasn't?So why hasn’t Trump made any progress in the courts?
I think its a fair point that your blind faith in the black robes is misplacedWhataboutisms don’t work....
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?I think its a fair point that your blind faith in the black robes is misplacedWhataboutisms don’t work....
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
Yes, it is evidence. Any court of law would consider it evidence. Murderers have been convicted and sentenced to death on less evidence.Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
lol god you’re such a joke.Yes, it is evidence. Any court of law would consider it evidence. Murderers have been convicted and sentenced to death on less evidence.Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
Yes, I consider the woman's testimony to be credible. Dims are so fucking stupid and dishonest that her story is easily credible.
The election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lolThe election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
You are another poor soul not to watch history being made. You only believe the lies of the Commie News Network.I take it you haven't watched any of the state legislation hearings in VA, AZ and MI the past few days.You missed a lot of fraud info.Wow, so the actual results don't even matter to you? Just the results you want. How sad.So if they find more fraud, you don't think they should recertify? How rampant must the fraud be that they actually found any in 100 ballot sample.Arizona certified already. All that is left is the never ending stream of republican tears.
Nope. Biden won. Get over it.
Says the man STILL bitching about the results a month after the election was held.
How sad indeed.
Yup all 0% of it!!
MAGA
Yeah, that's a good argument!No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lolThe election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
Lol I already gave my argument. Now I’m just telling you some more truth.Yeah, that's a good argument!No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lolThe election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fireSo what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
Arizona certified already. All that is left is the never ending stream of republican tears.
Where has mass voter fraud every been found ? All bullshit so trump could play his little games ..yall are eating it up .Yet all they had to do is look at 100 ballots and found fraud. Go figure.Oh look more trump tards fantasy land ... Read my lips no fraud was found !! Never seen so much trumped up shit in my life .. y’all do know Santa is not real ?!?