BOOM. Investigation of 100-Ballot Sample in Arizona Finds 3% of the Ballots Were Deemed Fraudulent in Favor of Joe Biden – Larger Audit Granted

So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
 
You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”
 
You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”
Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
 
You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”
Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?
Yes, it is evidence. Any court of law would consider it evidence. Murderers have been convicted and sentenced to death on less evidence.

Yes, I consider the woman's testimony to be credible. Dims are so fucking stupid and dishonest that her story is easily credible.
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.
 
You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it.
sworn wittinesses are the “evidence”
Um no. That is not evidence. It doesn’t help when people say the dumbest shit. There was a woman who claimed she saw a Biden campaign van destroying ballots in broad daylight in a polling station parking lot. How retarded is this woman? Could she have come up with a more ridiculous story? Tell me, do you believe that story?
Yes, it is evidence. Any court of law would consider it evidence. Murderers have been convicted and sentenced to death on less evidence.

Yes, I consider the woman's testimony to be credible. Dims are so fucking stupid and dishonest that her story is easily credible.
lol god you’re such a joke.
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.
The election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.

Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.
The election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.

Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lol
 
Arizona certified already. All that is left is the never ending stream of republican tears.
So if they find more fraud, you don't think they should recertify? How rampant must the fraud be that they actually found any in 100 ballot sample.

Nope. Biden won. Get over it.
Wow, so the actual results don't even matter to you? Just the results you want. How sad.

Says the man STILL bitching about the results a month after the election was held.

How sad indeed.
I take it you haven't watched any of the state legislation hearings in VA, AZ and MI the past few days.You missed a lot of fraud info.


Yup all 0% of it!!
MAGA
You are another poor soul not to watch history being made. You only believe the lies of the Commie News Network.
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.
The election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.

Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lol
Yeah, that's a good argument!
 
So what’s the alternative then huh? Why are you so convinced these judges are in the wrong?
There is far too much smoke in the air for even comatose judges to find no fire
Here’s the issue. You’re giving credibility to any idiot who has claimed to see voter fraud despite that person not having any evidence to present that they saw it. You people would ridicule this same standard when it came to someone making an allegation against Trump. Now you pretend this standard has complete credibility because it fits your narrative.
We are talking about people who submitted affidavits under oath, moron. They can go to prison if they lied.
Hey moron, those affidavits are being dismissed left and right. Most of the affidavits that Trump’s legal team claims to have have not even been filed in court. Also, as to the issue of consequences, it’s very rare for anyone to be charged with perjury outside of normal court proceedings. All of this is complete bullshit.
The election was a swindle. It's obvious that you sleazy lying scumbags don't want to ensure that it was fair and above board. That's even more incriminating.

Dims are all crooks. That's all you're proving.
No Trumptards are just pathetic sore losers lol
Yeah, that's a good argument!
Lol I already gave my argument. Now I’m just telling you some more truth.
 
Oh look more trump tards fantasy land ... Read my lips no fraud was found !! Never seen so much trumped up shit in my life .. y’all do know Santa is not real ?!?
Yet all they had to do is look at 100 ballots and found fraud. Go figure.
Where has mass voter fraud every been found ? All bullshit so trump could play his little games ..yall are eating it up .

You're not watching the state legislatures of GA, PA, MI and other states getting info to invalidate and decertify their elections? I pity you because you're not watching democracy at work and history being made. And yes, we eat this shit up. WETSU!
 

Forum List

Back
Top