Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
What lack of integrity on my part? For proving that this thread is a lie? Ok.
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
- Thread starter dcbl
- Start date
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Your opinion was based on a political game being played by the butthurt liberals.I do hope you have been educated on the Kavanaugh debacle from the left being decided by actual JUDGES and not POLITICIANS.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
fvck Kavanaugh & fvck Roberts too; the sooner they are rotting in Hell the better.
Yesterday would not have been soon enuff.
Ya'll have egg on yer faces. lol
I watched the Senate hearings for that Kavanaugh idiot live, as they unfolded.
I form my own goddamn opinion; I don't need your BS, or anyone else's BS to form an opinion for me.
I form my own fvcking opions; period.
Kavanuagh was likely the worst witness I have ever seen in any venue.
What an asinine waste of human flesh he is.
He was a complete jack ass jerk, hostile, combative, whining, poor fvcking me; I"M BRETT KAVANAUGH.
WHY ARE YOU PICKING ON ME? WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
What a fvcking joke.
They were just mucking up the water because it was a Trump pick.
You choked on it hook line and sinker.
My opinion IS based on the testimony provided by shithead Kavanaugh, himself; nothing else.
You painted yourself in a corner, and this is your response?
You just can't bring yourself to man up like I did, can you?
I didn't expect you to, you're a democrat minion.
But, you have shown to all who reads your posts on this thread that you have no integrity.
Kavanaugh will prevail as a Justice because it was all a scam
The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.
The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.
You are wrong.
So this makes you clueless, it seems.
Rules of Removing a Supreme Court Justice
Although an appointment to the United States Supreme Court is a lifetime appointment, the U.S. Constitution includes language that allows a justice to be impeached and forcibly removed from office. Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution states, "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.
They can be impeached, but first they need evidence which they couldn't find.
It was a political stunt pulled by the left.
Last edited:
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
First off, How IN THE HELL, were there 83 Ethics Complaints. WTF?
iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,926
- 1,600
when you "argue" with someone who feels their emotional state is always the correct one, fuck facts, you get into the stupidest of arguments, it would seemYou painted yourself in a corner, and this is your response?
You just can't bring yourself to man up like I did, can you?
I didn't expect you to, you're a democrat minion.
But, you have shown to all who reads your posts on this thread that you have no integrity.
Kavanaugh will prevail as a Justice because it was all a scam
Ambivalent1
Gold Member
- Banned
- #107
You’re a fucking moron.The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.
Prove they can't be investigated son, you surely can can't you?
Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
The judges concluded that while the complaints "are serious," there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices.
LOL, what a dumbass.
"there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices"
Judges don't investigate. What are you, 12?
It's called the poo flinging approach, throw as much shit at the wall as possible, and hope that something will stick.
Last edited:
BasicHumanUnit
Diamond Member
mikegriffith1
Mike Griffith
They should ask Christine Blasey-Ford to take a real polygraph, not the rigged one that she cited to support her contradiction-filled story (her "polygraph" did not even include a single control question, which is unheard of in real polygraphs).
- Thread starter
- #111
but you did not prove that
thread title says all charges dismissed
they are
charges against Kavanaugh were always a farce
- Thread starter
- #112
Orange Man BAD
ptbw forever
Gold Member
- May 9, 2015
- 16,522
- 1,785
- 290
- Banned
- #113
He already said he would pick Barrett next.
Whether she is actually establishment or not, she is the one non-establishment people want the most.
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
You painted yourself in a corner, and this is your response?
You just can't bring yourself to man up like I did, can you?
I didn't expect you to, you're a democrat minion.
But, you have shown to all who reads your posts on this thread that you have no integrity.
Kavanaugh will prevail as a Justice because it was all a scam
Man up by agreeing with your wingnut claim that Kavanaugh was the victim of a clown show? Sorry dude, but he’s an attempted rapist and a perjurer. House Democrats will prove the latter.
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
They can impeach him for perjury.The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.
You are wrong.
So this makes you clueless, it seems.
Rules of Removing a Supreme Court Justice
Although an appointment to the United States Supreme Court is a lifetime appointment, the U.S. Constitution includes language that allows a justice to be impeached and forcibly removed from office. Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution states, "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.
They can be impeached, but first they need evidence which they couldn't find.
It was a political stunt pulled by the left.
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
He’s a scumbag, that’s how.
You painted yourself in a corner, and this is your response?
You just can't bring yourself to man up like I did, can you?
I didn't expect you to, you're a democrat minion.
But, you have shown to all who reads your posts on this thread that you have no integrity.
Kavanaugh will prevail as a Justice because it was all a scam
Man up by agreeing with your wingnut claim that Kavanaugh was the victim of a clown show? Sorry dude, but he’s an attempted rapist and a perjurer. House Democrats will prove the latter.
Based on what? There is ZERO evidence to support that claim.
I do hope you have been educated on the Kavanaugh debacle from the left being decided by actual JUDGES and not POLITICIANS.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
fvck Kavanaugh & fvck Roberts too; the sooner they are rotting in Hell the better.
Yesterday would not have been soon enuff.
Ya'll have egg on yer faces. lol
I watched the Senate hearings for that Kavanaugh idiot live, as they unfolded.
I form my own goddamn opinion; I don't need your BS, or anyone else's BS to form an opinion for me.
I form my own fvcking opions; period.
Kavanuagh was likely the worst witness I have ever seen in any venue.
What an asinine waste of human flesh he is.
He was a complete jack ass jerk, hostile, combative, whining, poor fvcking me; I"M BRETT KAVANAUGH.
WHY ARE YOU PICKING ON ME? WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
What a fvcking joke.
Do you need your diaper changed, Kid? You seem a bit "fussy"!
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
You’re a fucking moron.The circle jerk of ignorance is going strong in this thread.wow
what a surprise
I'm shocked, literally shocked
BOOM!!!!! Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh!
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
They HAD to drop all the charges once he became SCOTUS Justice. They do not have the authority to investigate SCOTUS Justices.
It had nothing to do with exoneration.
Holy shit, you people are clueless. Now scurry off and look up ‘exoneration’.
Prove they can't be investigated son, you surely can can't you?
Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings.
The judges concluded that while the complaints "are serious," there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices.
LOL, what a dumbass.
"there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices"
Judges don't investigate. What are you, 12?
From the Brookings Institute:
The bottom line is that the complaints won’t proceed because Supreme Court justices are not subject to the federal court’s disciplinary mechanism. Here’s an explanation:
A 1980 law, the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act, allows anyone to file “a written complaint” alleging judicial misconduct or performance-degrading disability. The Act defines misconduct as “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.”
The complaint goes to the clerk of the court of appeals in the regional federal judicial circuit that includes the court of the judge who is the object of the complaint.https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixg...ics-complaints-against-brett-kavanaugh/#_edn1 The Act tells the clerk, upon receipt of a complaint, to transmit it to the circuit chief judge. If the chief judge, for one reason or another, has recused himself or herself from a particular complaint or from all complaints, the complaint goes to the next most senior judge in active service.
Recently, the clerk of the court of appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on which now-Justice Kavanaugh served before his elevation, received at least fifteen complaints about him, probably related to his testimony at his court of appeals confirmation hearing in 2006 or at his Supreme Court hearing. The chief judge of the court of appeals, Merrick Garland (President Obama’s unsuccessful Supreme Court nominee) recused himself from the matter, so the complaints went to Judge Karen Henderson.
Judge Henderson, in turn, invoked Rule 26 of the federal courts’ Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, which explains how courts should process complaints under the Act. Rule 26 authorizes a chief circuit judge, “n exceptional circumstances,” to ask the chief justice to transfer a complaint to another circuit’s judicial council, the all-judge statutory body in each circuit with administrative oversight of the courts of the circuit. At Judge Henderson’s request, officials of the D.C. circuit council, in five letters between September 20 and October 5, transmitted 15 complaints about then-Judge Kavanaugh to the chief justice and asked him to transfer the complaints to another council. Each letter cited as the reason “the exceptional circumstances related to the . . . complaints and the concern that local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process.” (The Kavanaugh hearings began on September 4 and ended on September 27, the day that both Professor Christine Ford and he testified. The Senate confirmed him on October 6.)
A 1980 law, the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act, allows anyone to file “a written complaint” alleging judicial misconduct or performance-degrading disability. The Act defines misconduct as “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.”
The complaint goes to the clerk of the court of appeals in the regional federal judicial circuit that includes the court of the judge who is the object of the complaint.https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixg...ics-complaints-against-brett-kavanaugh/#_edn1 The Act tells the clerk, upon receipt of a complaint, to transmit it to the circuit chief judge. If the chief judge, for one reason or another, has recused himself or herself from a particular complaint or from all complaints, the complaint goes to the next most senior judge in active service.
Recently, the clerk of the court of appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on which now-Justice Kavanaugh served before his elevation, received at least fifteen complaints about him, probably related to his testimony at his court of appeals confirmation hearing in 2006 or at his Supreme Court hearing. The chief judge of the court of appeals, Merrick Garland (President Obama’s unsuccessful Supreme Court nominee) recused himself from the matter, so the complaints went to Judge Karen Henderson.
Judge Henderson, in turn, invoked Rule 26 of the federal courts’ Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, which explains how courts should process complaints under the Act. Rule 26 authorizes a chief circuit judge, “n exceptional circumstances,” to ask the chief justice to transfer a complaint to another circuit’s judicial council, the all-judge statutory body in each circuit with administrative oversight of the courts of the circuit. At Judge Henderson’s request, officials of the D.C. circuit council, in five letters between September 20 and October 5, transmitted 15 complaints about then-Judge Kavanaugh to the chief justice and asked him to transfer the complaints to another council. Each letter cited as the reason “the exceptional circumstances related to the . . . complaints and the concern that local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process.” (The Kavanaugh hearings began on September 4 and ended on September 27, the day that both Professor Christine Ford and he testified. The Senate confirmed him on October 6.)
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 76,387
- 73,694
- 3,605
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Genocidal Arab Gaza ("health") death ministry attacks humanitarian US/Israel, murders 5 workers
- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 1
-
-
Breaking: A mob of Mexican nationalists and leftist militants have surrounded the Double Tree Hotel in Whittier- Started by Deplorable Yankee
- Replies: 3
-
