jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,626
- 30,081
- 2,180
Will let scotus tell usSure, the evidence
There is none.
The courts have said that.
Trump's own legal team has said that.
Read the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will let scotus tell usSure, the evidence
There is none.
The courts have said that.
Trump's own legal team has said that.
Read the thread.
Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraudWrong.So it wasn't the cases themselves, but the evidence that was thrown out by Deomocrat judges.the record is virtually empty of facts
There was no ‘evidence’ to begin with; that's why the cases are devoid of merit and being dismissed.
Also wrong.Sure, the evidenceAnd yet again – the case won’t be heard by the Supreme Court because the district court and appellate court will be in agreement; there won’t be anything for the High Court to ‘review.’There's some problems you should know about.Last stop on the way to the SCOTUS.
We'll see.
The appeal that was just struck down wasn't even about the facts of the case. It was actually appealing a denial of a motion for Giuliani to amend his complaint.
That means, at best, the most that Giuliani and Trump can hope for is that SCOTUS referees that denial and allows Giuliani to amend his complaint which puts it all the way back down at the trial judge to actually hear the case. Any decision that actually matters would have to go through the trial judge, then appeals, then SCOTUS.
As is suppression of the evidence in court.Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraud
we found powell's proof-reader.Yep, ifnoung evidence is usually whyRead the thread
I have.
It's my thread.
And again, you need something to appeal.
Every option was exercised, and ignoring voter suppression isn’t a good thing, and cheating would be accepted. Sad. But you still believe Russia Russia. And you’re still a hypocriteWill let scotus tell us
And when they reject it, what will be your response?
Sorry, this isn’t 2000 – a partisan Republican Supreme Court isn’t going award you the WH this time contrary to the will of the majority of the people.Will let scotus tell usSure, the evidence
There is none.
The courts have said that.
Trump's own legal team has said that.
Read the thread.
lolAs is suppression of the evidence in court.Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraud
Sorry, this isn’t 2000 – a partisan Republican Supreme Court isn’t going award you the WH this time contrary to the will of the majority of the people.
It's too late for the cases to be "heard" by the supreme court. But the court may issue a per curium order to have the case reheard in the lower court.And yet again – the case won’t be heard by the Supreme Court because the district court and appellate court will be in agreement; there won’t be anything for the High Court to ‘review.’
nice. trumptard is concerned about voter suppression. that's a riot.Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraudWrong.So it wasn't the cases themselves, but the evidence that was thrown out by Deomocrat judges.the record is virtually empty of facts
There was no ‘evidence’ to begin with; that's why the cases are devoid of merit and being dismissed.
Trumps lawyers have repeatedly told the judges, that their cases aren't "fraud" cases.Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraudThere was no ‘evidence’ to begin with; that's why the cases are devoid of merit and being dismissed.
They are fully invested at this point. This is what happens when you make supporting a politician part of your identity.I do wonder about the intelligence of the trumpers parroting these bogus "steal" theories. When will it dawn on these types that its all a load of bollox ?
This is like when Trump held a press conference about handing over his assets to his family to control, and showed stacks and stacks of manila folders piled on a desk.Plenty of evidence, ignoring it doesn’t mean there is none. Voter suppression is fraud
Except that Trump's team does not introduce this "evidence" in court.
So no, there isn't plenty of evidence.
The Court cases are playing out in a most interesting manner. I am interested to see them come to their conclusion though I doubt that anything other than a proper investigation will get all the evidence of Voter Fraud. The real question is: was there enough to turn the election??
Greg
I'm sure the Dems will riot over that, as they have been doing all along for most of this year in Portland, Seattle, and New York among other anarchist jurisdictions.nice. trumptard is concerned about voter suppression. that's a riot.