BOMBSHELL: Key Evidence Undermining Ukraine Impeachment Narrative Withheld From Trump Defense

Notice the distinct lack of support for Shokin here. In fact, no where does the memo actually support Shokin specifically. It supports the government’s agenda at reform.

You guys really need to read the actual words.


LOL What part "of your government" don't you understand?
 
Last edited:
LOLL What part "of your government" don't you understand?
I understand it perfectly well.

The hack “journalists” that got this letter want us to believe it shows support for Shokin. It doesn’t. It shows support for Shokin’s government who was trying to reform their justice system, an effort that Shokin was obstructing.
 
The letter praising Shokin’s performance came a mere six months before Biden successfully pressured Ukrainian officials to fire Shokin. This undermines the Democrats’ impeachment narrative and Biden’s justification for Shokin’s firing. As such, this new evidence supports allegations that Biden’s effort to get Shokin fire was motivated by personal reasons.
2) Shokin was under pressure because he WASN'T investigating Burisma.
Shokin was a pawn and did as he was told by corrupt Ukrainian Officials.
As per post #15. Wow! You nailed it son! Well, except for all the contradictory facts and video and
documentation provided.
But the memos obtained by Just the News and the Southeastern Legal Foundation under a Freedom of Information Act request show senior State Department officials — including then-Secretary of State John Kerry — were sending the opposite message to Shokin the summer before his firing.
"We have been impressed with the ambitious reform and anti-corruption agenda of your government," then-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland personally wrote Shokin in an official letter dated June 9, 2015 that was delivered to the prosecutor two days later by then-U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt.
Nuland, now President Biden's undersecretary of state, wrote that "Secretary Kerry asked me to reply on his behalf" to let Shokin know he enjoyed the full support of the United States as he set out to fight endemic corruption in the former Soviet republic.
"The ongoing reform of your office, law enforcement, and the judiciary will enable you to investigate and prosecute corruption and other crimes in an effective, fair, and transparent manner," Nuland added. "The United States fully supports your government's efforts to fight corruption and other crimes in an effective, fair and transparent manner."
As you can see, Viktor Shokin was assured by high up sources from the office of John Kerry (Secretary of
State) that Shokin enjoyed "the full support of the United States" as he set out to fight endemic corruption in the former Soviet republic.

Yet the geniuses here paint an exactly different picture of Shokin's removal from his office as prosecutor
of Burisma, Hunter Biden's sugar daddy.
And Joe Biden personally threatened Ukraine with loss of their aid from the US if Shokin was not
forced to leave office (as he claimed in his infamous video that he proudly showed to buddies of him being an
asshole and pushing his weight around in Ukraine, hence he's called Quid Pro Quo Joe).



So you can believe Biden's own video where he proudly announced how he bullied Ukraine into
promply dumping Skokin or you can believe some asshole troll here contradicting all the evidentiary information that counters precisely what he is blowing out his ass!

Ain't no opinion...in Joe's own words and on Joe's own video he describes how he bullied Ukraine officials
to fire Shokin or he would fly back to Washington DC with their aid money in his pocket (which is a crime
by the way).
 
Last edited:
And Joe Biden personally threatened Ukraine with loss of their aid from the US if Shokin was not
forced to leave office (as he claimed in his infamous video that he proudly showed to buddies of him being an
asshole and pushing his weight around in Ukraine, hence he's called Quid Pro Quo Joe).
Yes, Joe threatened to withhold aide, because he and every leader of surrounding Countries wanted Shokin to actually investigate the Ukrainian Officials, who were corrupt. This is well know.

Rudy and trump made up the fake story about biden wanting to fire shokin for actually investigating Burisma. Shoking was NOT investigating the corruption in Ukraine, including NOT investigating Burisma.

You have NO PROOF whats so every, just the word of rudy, trump and shokin himself.


Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 5.15.40 PM.png
 
As per post #15. Wow! You nailed it son! Well, except for all the contradictory facts and video and
documentation provided.

As you can see, Viktor Shokin was assured by high up sources from the office of John Kerry (Secretary of
State) that Shokin enjoyed "the full support of the United States" as he set out to fight endemic corruption in the former Soviet republic.

Yet the geniuses here paint an exactly different picture of Shokin's removal from his office as prosecutor
of Burisma, Hunter Biden's sugar daddy.
And Joe Biden personally threatened Ukraine with loss of their aid from the US if Shokin was not
forced to leave office (as he claimed in his infamous video that he proudly showed to buddies of him being an
asshole and pushing his weight around in Ukraine, hence he's called Quid Pro Quo Joe).



So you can believe Biden's own video where he proudly announced how he bullied Ukraine into
promply dumping Skokin or you can believe some asshole troll here contradicting all the evidentiary information that counters precisely what he is blowing out his ass!

Ain't no opinion...in Joe's own words and on Joe's own video he describes how he bullied Ukraine officials
to fire Shokin or he would fly back to Washington DC with their aid money in his pocket (which is a crime
by the way).
 
Ukrainian prosecutors and anti-corruption activists with knowledge of the matter argue that the timeline of developments in the Burisma case and Shokin's stint as chief prosecutor simply does not fit the narrative being put forward by Trump and his allies.

Moreover, they say that Shokin himself was the biggest obstacle standing in the way of the investigation.
 
"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.
 
"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.
Biden didn't help his son? Yes he did, he fired the prosecutor that was going after his son and Burisma. I provided evidence that Shokin was indeed investigating corruption. The 'long list' of organizations are falling in line with Biden's assertion that's all. In order to believe Biden, you have to believe that Hunter was hired for his expertise in energy when Hunter himself said it could have been because he was the son of a U.S. VP. You have to believe that Shokin lied in a legal statement where he said he was investigating corruption. You have to believe that Hunter's CEO was lying when he said some of the money went to the Big Guy which was Joe Biden. You have to believe that Biden's brother, when asked how they were getting away with it, didn't say that Joe had 'plausible deniability.' Make no mistake, Biden was driving the firing of Shokin because he was about to be outed for doing illegal dealings using U.S. taxpayer money.
 
Biden didn't help his son? Yes he did, he fired the prosecutor that was going after his son and Burisma. I provided evidence that Shokin was indeed investigating corruption.
No you didn't.
You provided a statement (Letter) from Shokin.

You provided no evidence.
 
No you didn't.
You provided a statement (Letter) from Shokin.

You provided no evidence.
I provided a link proving he testified under oath he was pursuing corruption when Biden got him fired. You have provided nothing. You did not even reply to my last post because you got exactly 0.
 
It's also interesting that not until Shokin started investigating Biden's son did Biden bribe the Ukraine to fire Shokin. Until then, even John Kerry applauded Shokin's efforts.
 
Yes, Joe threatened to withhold aide, because he and every leader of surrounding Countries wanted Shokin to actually investigate the Ukrainian Officials, who were corrupt. This is well know.

Rudy and trump made up the fake story about biden wanting to fire shokin for actually investigating Burisma. Shoking was NOT investigating the corruption in Ukraine, including NOT investigating Burisma.

You have NO PROOF whats so every, just the word of rudy, trump and shokin himself.


View attachment 618862
"No proof" except for the letter from Victoria Neuland praising Shokin for his good work and
personal praise from Secretary of State, John Kerry.
What sort of stupid fuck claims no proof from a letter that comes directly from the Secretary of State's
office praising Shokin for his commendable work?
"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.
Your bullshit repetitious talking points are not proof of any kind.
You are merely repeating your talking points. So fuck off!
 

Forum List

Back
Top