BLM Vs McCarthyism

[Daryl Hunt]

I lived through the end of the communist witch hunts. McCarthyism hurt a lot of people for the sake grandstanding and they didn't care about the humans that are damaged or the facts or the after effects. But Senator Joe didn't urge people to violence either, but it created backlash we still feel today. I have no idea what BLM really is or what they really represent. But other than a nice title, they don't seem concerned with the lives of poor innocent blacks anymore than Joseph McCarthy was about fighting communism. Lets end this insanity. Stop the hate, learn to forgive and move on.

Pure Bullshit. McCarthy was absolutely fighting to prevent what we're living today - a Communist insurrection in the United States funded and led by liberal elites in Hollywood and the nation's universities. You listen to too much fake news and fake history - history written by the communists who set him up so they could discredit him.

There is racism in the United States but not systemic racism. We elected a black president. 41% of white men voted for Obama, as did 46% of white women. White, anti-black, racism in the US, as a systemic, government, problem is over. Individual racists in government can, and should, still be dealt with.

BLM and the current fascist movement called AintIFascist are not at all comparable to McCarthy. McCarthy was a hero and BLM and Antifa are terrorist threats and revolutionaries trying to destroy the United States.

You can't be a Fiscist and a Communits (really a Socialist). They are opposite sides of the spectrum.

No their not. That Antifa calls everyone on the right a fascist doesn't make it so.

In the Spanish Civil War it was a war between the Fascists (Franco) and the Socialist. The Fascists were backed by the two Fascist Countries (Germany and Italy) and the Socialists were backed by the USSR. And the Fascist won which Italy had a Fascist Government well past 1974 beyond the death of Franco. I have personal experience in both the "Socialist" and the "Fascist" countries and, I'll say this. There are NO Socialist Countries at all. Those that call themselves Socialist without anything other qualifiers are Dictatorship or Totalitarian. And the only real long running Fascist Country is Spain (it's slowly moved to a Social Democratic Country like most of Europe).

I'll also tell you that I was better treated in the Fascist Country and had more Freedoms than the so called Socialist Countries. But the Fascist Country still had a very strong Military/Police presence that was very strong and was overwhelming. Trust me, there are stark differences. In a Fascist Country, there is tons of privately owned businesses both large and small. The Government does NOT control the Capitalism. In a Socialist Government, the Government controls the Capitalism for the most part. Fascism is better but it's still not something that we Americans will ever tolerate. When Capitalism wags the Governments Tail like Fascism does it's not a good thing. But I don't expect you to understand that. Your brain washing from your handlers will never teach you that.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

McCarthyism was bad enough, they were the original "cancel" culture. Getting people fired, shaming them, blacklist where bad enough. Because of things folks did 20 years earlier, youthful indiscretions or mistakes people make. But NOW hold on here. Somebody pointed out, this is different. Its worse. But the same. McCarthy didn't endeavor to destroy the fabric of American culture, McCarthyism was a tear, a pull at the thread...These BLM chaps want to pull down statues, destroy police and law enforcement and this doesn't benefit anyone. This is dire, far worse that McCarthy could have dreamt.

It's being overblown by the Party of the Rumpsters trying to make us all not notice the blunders of the Rump. Almost no one wants to do away with the Police Forces. Most of us want to make them more fiscally responsible. And that is usually a Conservatives point of contension. But the Party of the Rump are NOT Conservatives nor Fiscally Responsible or even Republicans.

You call burning and looting and assassination overblown? You’re a phony.

BLM isn't burning and looting and assassinating. Did your handlers tell you that? You've been lied to once again. Sure be glad when you Party of the Rumpers are shown the door.

 

[whitehall]

The inconvenient truth for lefties is that the democrat party organized the so-called "communist witch hunts" and when it all went sour the media blamed the whole thing on a single loud mouthed republican senator who didn't even chair a committee. HUAC was a tool of the democrat majority in congress. Right now it seems that BLM is an extortion scheme endorsed by the media and Black lives are still being lost in Chicago (11 last weekend) while BLM seems to be concerned with occupying a park in Washington D.C. Why can't BLM count their money and call a truce and move on?

You can't shift the blame of McCarthy away from the Republicans. That post in the Senate he held, even though many thought it was without power, enabled him to do a lot of damage. McCarthy was a dangerous person for everyone around him and used his position to further his own power. In the end, his going after Eisenhower's Military was his undoing and he lost all support from all the other Republican Senators. It was allowed to go on too long because the Republicans were covering for one of it's own. There are so many similarities between McCarthy and Rump it isn't even funny and the covering of "One of your Own".

Republicans had no power to cover for McCarthy. Harry Truman was president and democrats were in the majority in congress. Hollywood blamed McCarthy when they fired their own screen writers and the media managed to blame the unfortunate era on a single republican when things went sour but it didn't save Truman. Bungling "give 'em hell Harry" couldn't even get support from his own party to run for a second full term after Korea even with the media on his side.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

McCarthyism was bad enough, they were the original "cancel" culture. Getting people fired, shaming them, blacklist where bad enough. Because of things folks did 20 years earlier, youthful indiscretions or mistakes people make. But NOW hold on here. Somebody pointed out, this is different. Its worse. But the same. McCarthy didn't endeavor to destroy the fabric of American culture, McCarthyism was a tear, a pull at the thread...These BLM chaps want to pull down statues, destroy police and law enforcement and this doesn't benefit anyone. This is dire, far worse that McCarthy could have dreamt.

It's being overblown by the Party of the Rumpsters trying to make us all not notice the blunders of the Rump. Almost no one wants to do away with the Police Forces. Most of us want to make them more fiscally responsible. And that is usually a Conservatives point of contension. But the Party of the Rump are NOT Conservatives nor Fiscally Responsible or even Republicans.

You call burning and looting and assassination overblown? You’re a phony.

BLM isn't burning and looting and assassinating. Did your handlers tell you that? You've been lied to once again. Sure be glad when you Party of the Rumpers are shown the door.

Yes, they are. Their objective, according to their leader, is to remove trump and not wait for any election. These are seditionists.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The inconvenient truth for lefties is that the democrat party organized the so-called "communist witch hunts" and when it all went sour the media blamed the whole thing on a single loud mouthed republican senator who didn't even chair a committee. HUAC was a tool of the democrat majority in congress. Right now it seems that BLM is an extortion scheme endorsed by the media and Black lives are still being lost in Chicago (11 last weekend) while BLM seems to be concerned with occupying a park in Washington D.C. Why can't BLM count their money and call a truce and move on?

You can't shift the blame of McCarthy away from the Republicans. That post in the Senate he held, even though many thought it was without power, enabled him to do a lot of damage. McCarthy was a dangerous person for everyone around him and used his position to further his own power. In the end, his going after Eisenhower's Military was his undoing and he lost all support from all the other Republican Senators. It was allowed to go on too long because the Republicans were covering for one of it's own. There are so many similarities between McCarthy and Rump it isn't even funny and the covering of "One of your Own".

Republicans had no power to cover for McCarthy. Harry Truman was president and democrats were in the majority in congress. Hollywood blamed McCarthy when they fired their own screen writers and the media managed to blame the unfortunate era on a single republican when things went sour but it didn't save Truman. Bungling "give 'em hell Harry" couldn't even get support from his own party to run for a second full term after Korea even with the media on his side.

They could have stopped him in 1956 when he went after Eisenhower. And in 1957 when they had majority but they finally did when it wasn't just Eisenhower (whom wasn't the Republican centers first choice) but when he went after the US Military.

But that's another story for another time. You characters want to present a false comparison between BLM and McCarthyism. McCarthy was bad news, that's a fact. the BLM has NEVER been connected with the Looting and such. In Denver, we had looting and such the first night. In Colorado, it's almost a tradition when things like that happen to call out the National Guard first thing. The 2nd night, zero looting and such stopped. But in Colorado, if a California Republican moves here, they become a Colorado Democrat. Well, except for Boulder and we don't talk about that place. The Looters and such that have been apprehended have not been connected with BLM at all. In fact, some have been connected with extreme right wing groups. Why are you condemning those groups?

Your Hate for America is showing. Well, at least, your hate for the America the way it should be. Your idea for America will never happen. Even you aren't sure what "That" version of America would be. But, the rest of us don't want it.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

McCarthyism was bad enough, they were the original "cancel" culture. Getting people fired, shaming them, blacklist where bad enough. Because of things folks did 20 years earlier, youthful indiscretions or mistakes people make. But NOW hold on here. Somebody pointed out, this is different. Its worse. But the same. McCarthy didn't endeavor to destroy the fabric of American culture, McCarthyism was a tear, a pull at the thread...These BLM chaps want to pull down statues, destroy police and law enforcement and this doesn't benefit anyone. This is dire, far worse that McCarthy could have dreamt.

It's being overblown by the Party of the Rumpsters trying to make us all not notice the blunders of the Rump. Almost no one wants to do away with the Police Forces. Most of us want to make them more fiscally responsible. And that is usually a Conservatives point of contension. But the Party of the Rump are NOT Conservatives nor Fiscally Responsible or even Republicans.

You call burning and looting and assassination overblown? You’re a phony.

BLM isn't burning and looting and assassinating. Did your handlers tell you that? You've been lied to once again. Sure be glad when you Party of the Rumpers are shown the door.

Yes, they are. Their objective, according to their leader, is to remove trump and not wait for any election. These are seditionists.

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

 

[badger2]

McCarthy was born at Appleton, Wisconsin. That is also the location of an installation that made counterfeit German and Japanese money during the war. It's not a coincidence that there are German underpinnings to Chinese thought (ex., theieoethe Reading Room in Pyongyang), and Chinese fentanyl also links to Floyd. The Cop as symbol of the superego. Defunding the police is a stupid idea.

'It's true: Deleuze and Guattari were constantly looking over their shoulders for traces of superegos; and they found all sorts of superegos (that of literature, of art,,,,). The fact that they kept looking was evidence enough that one didn't just discard the superego. The mutual derivations of subjugated and subject groups tells us a great deal about the survival of the superego because the former is perfused with the 'mechanisms for the repression of desire', and the strong superego of this heirarchized group is contrasted with the non-hierarchized latter group which apparently has no superego....The non-absolute distinction between the two kinds of groups requires one to uphold the superego. Looking backwards at the surrealist group, Deleuze and Guattari see the superego named Breton, whome they contrasted with Artaud-the-Schizo; still, they admitted that 'there will always be, in other words, a superego. Even the most revolutionary group will run up against one.'
(Guattari, Three Ecologies)

And for those that think they know about Chinese art, there is the quasi-famous portrayal of the Chinese Tartar Dark, adorned with a Corsican-style headband, shooting an arrow into the sky. The little-known Chinese word, 'duh,' is paradoxically used to denote astronomical units of measure, the Dark's arrow misses its superego target and always returns to Earth.

 

[badger2]

Goethe Reading Room in Pyongyang.

 

[Levant]

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

When did the President not follow the Constitution?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

When did the President not follow the Constitution?

Stop it, just stop it. He's gone. Now he's trying to bribe America to stay. The rest of Washington ain't buying it because it allowed, the only thing left would be a completely bankrupt nation.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The inconvenient truth for lefties is that the democrat party organized the so-called "communist witch hunts" and when it all went sour the media blamed the whole thing on a single loud mouthed republican senator who didn't even chair a committee. HUAC was a tool of the democrat majority in congress. Right now it seems that BLM is an extortion scheme endorsed by the media and Black lives are still being lost in Chicago (11 last weekend) while BLM seems to be concerned with occupying a park in Washington D.C. Why can't BLM count their money and call a truce and move on?

You can't shift the blame of McCarthy away from the Republicans. That post in the Senate he held, even though many thought it was without power, enabled him to do a lot of damage. McCarthy was a dangerous person for everyone around him and used his position to further his own power. In the end, his going after Eisenhower's Military was his undoing and he lost all support from all the other Republican Senators. It was allowed to go on too long because the Republicans were covering for one of it's own. There are so many similarities between McCarthy and Rump it isn't even funny and the covering of "One of your Own".

Republicans had no power to cover for McCarthy. Harry Truman was president and democrats were in the majority in congress. Hollywood blamed McCarthy when they fired their own screen writers and the media managed to blame the unfortunate era on a single republican when things went sour but it didn't save Truman. Bungling "give 'em hell Harry" couldn't even get support from his own party to run for a second full term after Korea even with the media on his side.

They could have stopped him in 1956 when he went after Eisenhower. And in 1957 when they had majority but they finally did when it wasn't just Eisenhower (whom wasn't the Republican centers first choice) but when he went after the US Military.

But that's another story for another time. You characters want to present a false comparison between BLM and McCarthyism. McCarthy was bad news, that's a fact. the BLM has NEVER been connected with the Looting and such. In Denver, we had looting and such the first night. In Colorado, it's almost a tradition when things like that happen to call out the National Guard first thing. The 2nd night, zero looting and such stopped. But in Colorado, if a California Republican moves here, they become a Colorado Democrat. Well, except for Boulder and we don't talk about that place. The Looters and such that have been apprehended have not been connected with BLM at all. In fact, some have been connected with extreme right wing groups. Why are you condemning those groups?

Your Hate for America is showing. Well, at least, your hate for the America the way it should be. Your idea for America will never happen. Even you aren't sure what "That" version of America would be. But, the rest of us don't want it.

BLM vandalism on a street leading up to the WH and you say they aren’t involved in vandalism?? You’re insane.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

McCarthyism was bad enough, they were the original "cancel" culture. Getting people fired, shaming them, blacklist where bad enough. Because of things folks did 20 years earlier, youthful indiscretions or mistakes people make. But NOW hold on here. Somebody pointed out, this is different. Its worse. But the same. McCarthy didn't endeavor to destroy the fabric of American culture, McCarthyism was a tear, a pull at the thread...These BLM chaps want to pull down statues, destroy police and law enforcement and this doesn't benefit anyone. This is dire, far worse that McCarthy could have dreamt.

It's being overblown by the Party of the Rumpsters trying to make us all not notice the blunders of the Rump. Almost no one wants to do away with the Police Forces. Most of us want to make them more fiscally responsible. And that is usually a Conservatives point of contension. But the Party of the Rump are NOT Conservatives nor Fiscally Responsible or even Republicans.

You call burning and looting and assassination overblown? You’re a phony.

BLM isn't burning and looting and assassinating. Did your handlers tell you that? You've been lied to once again. Sure be glad when you Party of the Rumpers are shown the door.

Yes, they are. Their objective, according to their leader, is to remove trump and not wait for any election. These are seditionists.

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

BLM did not stipulate any constitutional approach. They want to pressure trump out. They don’t care about any electoral or constitutional process. They want to usurp the constitution. They are a terrorist enemy.

 

[badger2]

It's likely Chinese fentanyl chemists.

18 Jun 2020 Fentanyl Bust

Port of San Luis CBP Officers Make Large Fentanyl Bust

Securing America's Borders

cbp.gov

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

I lived through the end of the communist witch hunts. McCarthyism hurt a lot of people for the sake grandstanding and they didn't care about the humans that are damaged or the facts or the after effects. But Senator Joe didn't urge people to violence either, but it created backlash we still feel today. I have no idea what BLM really is or what they really represent. But other than a nice title, they don't seem concerned with the lives of poor innocent blacks anymore than Joseph McCarthy was about fighting communism. Lets end this insanity. Stop the hate, learn to forgive and move on.

The old timer Dem Voters are living denial that the Democratic Party is being taken over by violent far left extremist.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

BLM is not a real Civil Rights group.
They are a violent racist hate group.

 

[Levant]

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

When did the President not follow the Constitution?

Stop it, just stop it. He's gone. Now he's trying to bribe America to stay. The rest of Washington ain't buying it because it allowed, the only thing left would be a completely bankrupt nation.

Thank you. You have nothing. It's always that way when the left is pushed for actual facts.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

When did the President not follow the Constitution?

Stop it, just stop it. He's gone. Now he's trying to bribe America to stay. The rest of Washington ain't buying it because it allowed, the only thing left would be a completely bankrupt nation.

Thank you. You have nothing. It's always that way when the left is pushed for actual facts.

What facts? This has been hashed and rehashed so many times it's not worth doing again. Rump is a criminal and so is his happy band of Criminals in waiting. Get over it and move on to something you can win.

 

[Levant]

OR could it be that when the President doesn't follow the Constitution that it's the duty of the rest of the country to "Legally" remove him from office? It's called, "Following the Constitution". Something you are having trouble understanding.

When did the President not follow the Constitution?

Stop it, just stop it. He's gone. Now he's trying to bribe America to stay. The rest of Washington ain't buying it because it allowed, the only thing left would be a completely bankrupt nation.

Thank you. You have nothing. It's always that way when the left is pushed for actual facts.

What facts? This has been hashed and rehashed so many times it's not worth doing again. Rump is a criminal and so is his happy band of Criminals in waiting. Get over it and move on to something you can win.

Good point... It's hard to claim a win in the debate against the retarded kid. Hard to claim a win in a fight against a child. Defeating you in an argument reminds me of Reagan's victory in Granada. I really do need to move on.

 

[badger2]

First we quote from Derrida to align BLM's Marxist agenda, before examining this male-male seeking of passion twixt the black male and the cop (superego symbol). Derrida presupposes the vandalism:

'In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, let us recall, a first noun returned three times on the same first page, the noun 'specter (Gespenst): 'A specter is haunting Europe,' says Marx in 1848, 'the specter of communism (Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa -- das Gespenst des Kommunismus].' Marx unless it is the other one, Engels, then puts on stage, for the time of a few paragraphs, the terror that this specter inspires in all the powers of old Europe. No one speaks of anything anymore but this specter. All phantasms are projected onto the screen of this ghost (that is, on something absent, for the screen itself is phantomatic, as in the television of the future which will have no 'screenic' support and will project its images directly on the eye, like the sound of a telephone deep in the ear). One watches for the signals, the table that turn, the dishes that move. Is it going to answer? As in the space of a salon during a spiritualist séance, but sometimes that space is what is called the street, one looks out for one's goods and furniture, attempting to adjust all of politics to the frightening hypothesis of a visitation.'
(Derrida, Specters of Marx, 1993)

The post-destruction street is the projected image that the BLM vandal deliberately produces, ghost of exchange capital and the commodity fetish.

 

[2aguy]

I lived through the end of the communist witch hunts. McCarthyism hurt a lot of people for the sake grandstanding and they didn't care about the humans that are damaged or the facts or the after effects. But Senator Joe didn't urge people to violence either, but it created backlash we still feel today. I have no idea what BLM really is or what they really represent. But other than a nice title, they don't seem concerned with the lives of poor innocent blacks anymore than Joseph McCarthy was about fighting communism. Lets end this insanity. Stop the hate, learn to forgive and move on.

Black LIves Matter is a marxist communist group......and the really dumb thing for those who support Black Lives Matter, Karl Marx hated Black people.....he was a total racist.........and he is the founder of their movements philosophy...