I am giving him the benefit of the doubt...I don't know the motive for his assault...but he clearly assault him,. It wasn't self-defense, that's clear, it wasn't defense of others....the white guy didn't appear to be insane....so the guilt of the assault is pretty clear.
To contend that one assaulted another or that one was not defending himself or herself or others is wholly dependent upon whether you have a firm grasp on the definition of aggression or force in the first place.
Trespassing is aggression. It is force. Forcing yourself into the lives of others, particularly on/onto their own private property uninvited, is aggressiveness and therefore invites defense. Escpecially if you're physically confronting them. Defending oneself or one's fellow community members cannot logically be spun around and twisted as if the defense against the initial aggression was the actual force. That's a fallacy.
Unless he had a valid reason for being there, he was actually the aggressor.
We're likely going to see a lot of this hapening in the near future. They're likely gonna start sending these little minions, likely the hood rat types, into productive residential areas in order to initiate conflict and then spin it around like they're some kind of victim. Of course, then, the quislings show up, 'protesting' as they call it.
Society simply won't tolerate it. Not when you get right down to the nitty gritty of it. Not in their own neighborhoods. Sure, it might be unicorns and fairies to the casual, contemporary cultural Marxist to think they will. But they won't. Again, it's simply not human nature.
And again, as I'd also mentioned elsewhere around here, it's why the brown-shirts have historically deservingly been the ones to suffer that societal retribution first. As it is, they're generally the actual initiators of conflict. They go projecting the image of conflict by making arbitrary claims, a blatant aggression in itself. But they have that whole 'I'm the victim' charade going on, whereas they're actually the aggresssor. Historically, it only works for a little wile before people wise up to what they're actually doing at the societal level of things. It's usually not until the driving force behind the agenda itself at the higher level has got their use from them that they abandon them and leave them to fend for themselves and their reputations in society. Which they never can. Again, historically speaking. Anyone who is a student of history likely will notice that we're probably just about at that point where history revisits itself.
Sit back and watch. It'll be a hoot.