Liberals don't riot, anarchists do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Liberals don't riot, anarchists do.
No. I'm laughing at your proposition that liberals don't riot.84 million people voted for Biden.
Are you saying that all 84 million are rioters?
Never fight a war on the enemy's terms.
The history of successful revolutions (with the exception of the American revolution) is a history of peaceful protests and political pressure that bring meaningful and permanent change.
Violent Revolution is almost always a failure. If the revolutionaries win, they usually impose a government that's worse than the one they replaced.
This is why the right-wing would like a violent civil war, and why intelligent liberals refuse to accommodate them.
The French Revolution, the Bolshevik revolution, Cuba, and Vietnam, just a few that come to mind, say your generalization is totally wrong.The history of successful revolutions
No. I'l mlaughing atyour proposition that liberals don't riot.
Here - I'll do it agihna:
Liberals don't riot, anarchists do. Anarchists have nothing to do with liberalism.
Here's the result of your armed but 'peaceful' protests:
Jury finds Unite the Right defendants liable for more than $26 million in damages
Unite the Right rally organizers found liable for violating Virginia conspiracy statute; plaintiffs are awarded millions in damages.www.cnn.com
^^^^You live in a world of Qunatic fantasy.
You live in a world of Qunatic fantasy.
The French Revolution, the Bolshevik revolution, Cuba, and Vietnam, just a few that come to mind, say your generalization is totally wrong.
Thompson(Chief of Waukesha PD)is a naked BLM supporter, who had his cops kneel(literally)to them as a sign of respect, and what you all need to understand right now, is this, the entire bureaucracy in Milwaukee, and Waukesha is democrat, this includes the mayors, DA's, everything. I have seen Brooks social media, and I watched appalled as Thompson stated matter of factly that no nexus to terror existed, that the racist, mass murdering Brooks, was in fact just fleeing another "ahh" disturbance.Targeting children for murder, how Leftist.
Who said BLM were Commie terrorists?
BLM 'militant' says parade 'the start of revolution' after Rittenhouse
A BLACK Lives Matter activist issued a troubling message by suggesting that the Waukesha Christmas parade attack was a signal that “the revolution” may have begun. Self-described activi…www.the-sun.com
None of those revolutions were successful because the governments they implemented were as bad or much worse than the governments they replaced.
The American Revolution is the only really successful revolution (that I can think of ) where the new government was better than the old government.
Just winning the violent conflict doesn't make the war successful. You have to justify your revolution by implementing a government that's better than the old one.
Is that so hard to comprehend?
Your subjective opinion about what is "successful" and "better" is immaterial. Vietnam's seems to have become a successful country, the French still exist. Your short-sightedness also doesn't take into account places like Bangladesh, Zaire, S. Africa--more examples of violent revolt with more stable governments as a result.None of those revolutions were successful because the governments they implemented were as bad or much worse than the governments they replaced.
The American Revolution is the only really successful revolution (that I can think of ) where the new government was better than the old government.
Just winning the violent conflict doesn't make the war successful. You have to justify your revolution by implementing a government that's better than the old one.
Is that so hard to comprehend?
there is no such thing as an intelligent liberal .Never fight a war on the enemy's terms.
The history of successful revolutions (with the exception of the American revolution) is a history of peaceful protests and political pressure that bring meaningful and permanent change.
Violent Revolution is almost always a failure. If the revolutionaries win, they usually impose a government that's worse than the one they replaced.
This is why the right-wing would like a violent civil war, and why intelligent liberals refuse to accommodate them.
One guy said that?
Ooooo, that's scary.
“Some guy”?Still, Vaun Mayes took to Facebook Live on Monday to suggest that Sunday's tragedy was the "start of a revolution."
Speaking from the scene of the attack, Mayes said: "I don’t know. Now we’ll have to wait and see because they do have somebody in custody. We may have to wait and see what they say about why this happened.
This is from your article. Before the perp was arrested. In the beginning, we were all wondering if this attack wasn't related to the Rittenhouse verdict.
He was wrong. It was just some guy running from police.
OK, Lather. You keep snorting the best licks in town.None of those revolutions were successful because the governments they implemented were as bad or much worse than the governments they replaced.
The American Revolution is the only really successful revolution (that I can think of ) where the new government was better than the old government.
Just winning the violent conflict doesn't make the war successful. You have to justify your revolution by implementing a government that's better than the old one.
Is that so hard to comprehend?
California will explode first....and it won't be a white black thing either.....more like Latino scouring out the black population. This is coming.....If anything, more likely the Chauvin murders, the Rittenhouse murders, and the 5 parade murders combined.
But I think there's still one coming very soon that will set it off.
A good time for both sides to stop agitating each other to make it happen sooner!
Tell that to you Leftards murdering hundreds every day.I think it's always better to err on the side of less violence. I think I've called it correctly, but I still have no idea what it's going to take for the left and the blacks to get out the guns. I suspect it's going to be a police murder of a black man or black men. Something that can be loosely justified but is questionable. Just my opinion weather.
And I'll use this opportunity to tell the braying asses to go quack themselves.
Self defense is not murder. Stay civil? Fat chance duck. I reserve civility for those who do not lie. Unfortunately, you aren't one of them.Rittenhouse murders