Bleeding Hearts Moan Over Bombing Iraqi Citizens

The left wasn't losing their minds when civilian deaths occurred under Obama's watch

Why is that?


Liar.

You RWNJs screeched about civilian deaths when Obama was prez but now you're fine with it because, well, you know, they aren't fetuses. Hypocrite.

We should not be bombing Iraq and we should never ever have bombed Iraq. Period.
After what Iraq did to Kuwait?

**** you Snowflake.

Yeah and let's not even get started on Saddam and the Kurds.

Just let dictators gas the populace and sit idly by

That is EXACTLY what the US did. As well as Assad.

You mean Obungles and his idiotic red line?
 
Mostly because he didn't start the wars and did everything he could to get us out of them. You don't get blamed for trying to fix what someone else fucked up.

Obama didn't fix shit. He created ISIS and funded the Muslim Brotherhood to topple more governments.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

Al-Qaeda in Iraq became ISI in 2006. How did Obama, a Senator in 2006, create them?

When he armed, trained and funded them. I've already posted the proof. They were a nothing bullshit group that had already been subdued when Obama did that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, but we don't really need more evidence that you're insane.

The only one who is insane is you. The judicial watch document proves you are the one who can't accept reality. I'm just going to keep laughing at your dumbass. You look funny with your fingers in your ears screaming to avoid hearing the truth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moron, again, your own link is your worst nightmare. It points out how AQI spread from Iraq into Syria.
 
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...12-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf


AQI was just another little shitty branch of the terrorist group until Obama trained, armed and funded them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

In reality, they were the main Sunni belligerents of the civil war that erupted there.

You just keep spouting off total bullshit. AQI was nothing until Obama armed them. Al Nusra was the original belligerents that took a stand against Assad. Followed by the Free Syrian Army.

AQI was the Obama's way to get a piece of the action that backfired on everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now this is too funny... from your own link...

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:

They were defeated. On 13 October 2006, the MSC declared the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), comprising Iraq's six mostly Sunni Arab governorates: Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah al-Din, Ninawa, and "other parts of the governorate of Babel", with Abu Omar al-Baghdadi being announced as the self-proclaimed state's Emir.

Multiple groups were claiming the same shit but were all defeated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I posted the proof from Judicial Watch. I live in reality. You do not. Go back to sucking that leftist cock.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Funny how rightwingers always have gay sex in their minds. <smh>

It's just the first thing we associate with you leftist creeps. It's what you do best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope, you're the one who was thinking of it. You can't blame others for your own shortcomings, I don't care how desperate you are to shirk personal responsibility.

Keep lying and sucking dumbfuck. It's all you are good for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unlike you, I'm a married heterosexual. So's my wife. Ironically, the one who can't stop thinking of sucking is you. :ack-1:


The only ones not sucking are me and your wife.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The left wasn't losing their minds when civilian deaths occurred under Obama's watch

Why is that?

Trump fails again and you attempt to throw Obama into the mix. I bet your favorite musician is Muddy Waters.
 
Obama didn't fix shit. He created ISIS and funded the Muslim Brotherhood to topple more governments.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

Al-Qaeda in Iraq became ISI in 2006. How did Obama, a Senator in 2006, create them?

When he armed, trained and funded them. I've already posted the proof. They were a nothing bullshit group that had already been subdued when Obama did that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, but we don't really need more evidence that you're insane.

The only one who is insane is you. The judicial watch document proves you are the one who can't accept reality. I'm just going to keep laughing at your dumbass. You look funny with your fingers in your ears screaming to avoid hearing the truth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moron, again, your own link is your worst nightmare. It points out how AQI spread from Iraq into Syria.

Syria was still stable in 2006. Again you lie.
The fact is that AQI clearly stated their intentions during the Iraq war and were unable to accomplish them.

Then Obama decided to fund them in Syria. He trained and armed them and set them loose. He gave them the means and backing to accomplish what they failed to do under Bush.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
And Secretary Mattis makes the perfect response:

There is no military force in the world that has proven more sensitive to civilian casualties,” Mattis told Reuters reporters. “We go out of our way to always do everything humanly possible to reduce the loss of life or injury among innocent people. The same cannot be said for our adversaries.”

Read the full story @ Mattis Had The Perfect Response When Asked About Bombing Iraqi Civilians

Total rubbish of course. Other militarys don't go invade in the first place.
And Secretary Mattis makes the perfect response:

There is no military force in the world that has proven more sensitive to civilian casualties,” Mattis told Reuters reporters. “We go out of our way to always do everything humanly possible to reduce the loss of life or injury among innocent people. The same cannot be said for our adversaries.”

Read the full story @ Mattis Had The Perfect Response When Asked About Bombing Iraqi Civilians

why are we still bombing Iraqis 14 years after Bush Declared "Mission Accomplished".

This would be like still bombing Japanese Civilians in 1959.
------------------------------------ and we most certainly woulda kept bombing the 'japs' after 14 years if they had acted like the 'muslims' . Same goes for the 'krauts' JoeB !!
------------------------------------------------------- just my thinking , we had just won the ww2 on 2 fronts there is no way that we woulda allowed japs or krauts to mess up up our allied victory . And i hear that there were internal factions in both germany and japan that wanted to keep their resistance going . Heard that one org. in germany was the 'werewolves' . Don't know for sure OldYellar !!
 
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

In reality, they were the main Sunni belligerents of the civil war that erupted there.

You just keep spouting off total bullshit. AQI was nothing until Obama armed them. Al Nusra was the original belligerents that took a stand against Assad. Followed by the Free Syrian Army.

AQI was the Obama's way to get a piece of the action that backfired on everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

Your insanity is even worse than I thought. :ack-1:

I said Al-Qaeda in Iraq, not Al-Qaeda. There is a difference, which obviously eludes you.

1233796371590.gif


That you keep plowing through this debate by leading with your chin and your ignorance is all anyone here needs to see you have no ******* clue about what's even being discussed.

There isn't a difference. More bending of the truth to suit your story. You are a delusional person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

That you don't know the difference only serves to highlight your ignorance.

giphy.gif


Moron, Al-Qaeda in Iraq started as a terrorist group which went into Iraq after we invaded and then devoted themselves to Al-Qaeda. They weren't part of Al-Qaeda prior to that. In 2006, they changed their name again to ISI (ISIL, before appending Syria).

You might actually be the dumbest **** on this forum to not know any of this.
 
You just keep spouting off total bullshit. AQI was nothing until Obama armed them. Al Nusra was the original belligerents that took a stand against Assad. Followed by the Free Syrian Army.

AQI was the Obama's way to get a piece of the action that backfired on everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

Your insanity is even worse than I thought. :ack-1:

I said Al-Qaeda in Iraq, not Al-Qaeda. There is a difference, which obviously eludes you.

1233796371590.gif


That you keep plowing through this debate by leading with your chin and your ignorance is all anyone here needs to see you have no ******* clue about what's even being discussed.

There isn't a difference. More bending of the truth to suit your story. You are a delusional person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

That you don't know the difference only serves to highlight your ignorance.

giphy.gif


Moron, Al-Qaeda in Iraq started as a terrorist group which went into Iraq after we invaded and then devoted themselves to Al-Qaeda. They weren't part of Al-Qaeda prior to that. In 2006, they changed their name again to ISI (ISIL, before appending Syria).

You might actually be the dumbest **** on this forum to not know any of this.

Keep making shit up. They were pledged to Osama from the start. That is why they were known as Al Qaeda.

You are living in a make believe alternate reality.
The delusions are strong in you.

al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) | militant group




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

In reality, they were the main Sunni belligerents of the civil war that erupted there.

You just keep spouting off total bullshit. AQI was nothing until Obama armed them. Al Nusra was the original belligerents that took a stand against Assad. Followed by the Free Syrian Army.

AQI was the Obama's way to get a piece of the action that backfired on everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now this is too funny... from your own link...

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:

They were defeated. On 13 October 2006, the MSC declared the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), comprising Iraq's six mostly Sunni Arab governorates: Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah al-Din, Ninawa, and "other parts of the governorate of Babel", with Abu Omar al-Baghdadi being announced as the self-proclaimed state's Emir.

Multiple groups were claiming the same shit but were all defeated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"They were defeated."

Imbecile... if they were defeated, how'd they become known as ISI?

You're allergic to thinking, ain'tcha?
 
You just keep spouting off total bullshit. AQI was nothing until Obama armed them. Al Nusra was the original belligerents that took a stand against Assad. Followed by the Free Syrian Army.

AQI was the Obama's way to get a piece of the action that backfired on everyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now this is too funny... from your own link...

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:

They were defeated. On 13 October 2006, the MSC declared the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), comprising Iraq's six mostly Sunni Arab governorates: Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah al-Din, Ninawa, and "other parts of the governorate of Babel", with Abu Omar al-Baghdadi being announced as the self-proclaimed state's Emir.

Multiple groups were claiming the same shit but were all defeated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"They were defeated."

Imbecile... if they were defeated, how'd they become known as ISI?

You're allergic to thinking, ain'tcha?

All the land they claimed remained a part of Iraq at the end of the war. They were hiding in Syria when Obama claimed victory in Iraq.

You just can't deal with reality. I post outside sources and you just spout off liberal propaganda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Funny how rightwingers always have gay sex in their minds. <smh>

It's just the first thing we associate with you leftist creeps. It's what you do best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope, you're the one who was thinking of it. You can't blame others for your own shortcomings, I don't care how desperate you are to shirk personal responsibility.

Keep lying and sucking dumbfuck. It's all you are good for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unlike you, I'm a married heterosexual. So's my wife. Ironically, the one who can't stop thinking of sucking is you. :ack-1:


The only ones not sucking are me and your wife.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yet, the only one who can't stop thinking about it is you. :lol:
 
It's just the first thing we associate with you leftist creeps. It's what you do best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope, you're the one who was thinking of it. You can't blame others for your own shortcomings, I don't care how desperate you are to shirk personal responsibility.

Keep lying and sucking dumbfuck. It's all you are good for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unlike you, I'm a married heterosexual. So's my wife. Ironically, the one who can't stop thinking of sucking is you. :ack-1:


The only ones not sucking are me and your wife.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yet, the only one who can't stop thinking about it is you. :lol:

Post your sources not your opinion from drinking the lib kool-aid. Don't blame me for the bad taste left in your mouth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Too ******* deranged :cuckoo:

Al-Qaeda in Iraq became ISI in 2006. How did Obama, a Senator in 2006, create them?

When he armed, trained and funded them. I've already posted the proof. They were a nothing bullshit group that had already been subdued when Obama did that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, but we don't really need more evidence that you're insane.

The only one who is insane is you. The judicial watch document proves you are the one who can't accept reality. I'm just going to keep laughing at your dumbass. You look funny with your fingers in your ears screaming to avoid hearing the truth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moron, again, your own link is your worst nightmare. It points out how AQI spread from Iraq into Syria.

Syria was still stable in 2006. Again you lie.
The fact is that AQI clearly stated their intentions during the Iraq war and were unable to accomplish them.

Then Obama decided to fund them in Syria. He trained and armed them and set them loose. He gave them the means and backing to accomplish what they failed to do under Bush.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're too ******* rightarded. :cuckoo:

I'm talking about Al-Qaeda in IRAQ in 2006. Why the **** are you talking about Syria in 2006 unless you're insane and have no idea what you're talking about?
 
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

Your insanity is even worse than I thought. :ack-1:

I said Al-Qaeda in Iraq, not Al-Qaeda. There is a difference, which obviously eludes you.

1233796371590.gif


That you keep plowing through this debate by leading with your chin and your ignorance is all anyone here needs to see you have no ******* clue about what's even being discussed.

There isn't a difference. More bending of the truth to suit your story. You are a delusional person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

That you don't know the difference only serves to highlight your ignorance.

giphy.gif


Moron, Al-Qaeda in Iraq started as a terrorist group which went into Iraq after we invaded and then devoted themselves to Al-Qaeda. They weren't part of Al-Qaeda prior to that. In 2006, they changed their name again to ISI (ISIL, before appending Syria).

You might actually be the dumbest **** on this forum to not know any of this.

Keep making shit up. They were pledged to Osama from the start. That is why they were known as Al Qaeda.

You are living in a make believe alternate reality.
The delusions are strong in you.

al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) | militant group




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dumbfuck, do you even bother to read your own links? :eusa_doh: Your own link doesn't say that...

Al-Qaeda in Iraq first appeared in 2004 when Abū Muṣʿab al-Zarqāwī, a Jordanian-born militant already leading insurgent attacks in Iraq, formed an alliance with al-Qaeda, pledging his group’s allegiance to Osama bin Laden in return for bin Laden’s endorsement as the leader of al-Qaeda’s franchise in Iraq.

Moron.... how does a militant group "already leading insurgent attacks" when they aligned with Al-Qaeda, "pledge to Osama from the start??"

On top of all your other maladies, lacking common sense is among them.

And earlier, you idiotically claim Al-Qaeda in Iraq was nothing in Iraq, yet again, your own link reveals your ignorance...

Al-Zarqāwī, who quickly came to be regarded as one of the most destructive militants in Iraq, organized a wave of attacks, often suicide bombings, that targeted security forces, government institutions, and Iraqi civilians.
 
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now this is too funny... from your own link...

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:

They were defeated. On 13 October 2006, the MSC declared the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), comprising Iraq's six mostly Sunni Arab governorates: Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah al-Din, Ninawa, and "other parts of the governorate of Babel", with Abu Omar al-Baghdadi being announced as the self-proclaimed state's Emir.

Multiple groups were claiming the same shit but were all defeated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"They were defeated."

Imbecile... if they were defeated, how'd they become known as ISI?

You're allergic to thinking, ain'tcha?

All the land they claimed remained a part of Iraq at the end of the war. They were hiding in Syria when Obama claimed victory in Iraq.

You just can't deal with reality. I post outside sources and you just spout off liberal propaganda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

Your own sources have confirmed everything I said. :lol:

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:
 
15th post
Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

Your insanity is even worse than I thought. :ack-1:

I said Al-Qaeda in Iraq, not Al-Qaeda. There is a difference, which obviously eludes you.

1233796371590.gif


That you keep plowing through this debate by leading with your chin and your ignorance is all anyone here needs to see you have no ******* clue about what's even being discussed.

There isn't a difference. More bending of the truth to suit your story. You are a delusional person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

That you don't know the difference only serves to highlight your ignorance.

giphy.gif


Moron, Al-Qaeda in Iraq started as a terrorist group which went into Iraq after we invaded and then devoted themselves to Al-Qaeda. They weren't part of Al-Qaeda prior to that. In 2006, they changed their name again to ISI (ISIL, before appending Syria).

You might actually be the dumbest **** on this forum to not know any of this.

Keep making shit up. They were pledged to Osama from the start. That is why they were known as Al Qaeda.

You are living in a make believe alternate reality.
The delusions are strong in you.

al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) | militant group




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dumbfuck, do you even bother to read your own links? :eusa_doh: Your own link doesn't say that...

Al-Qaeda in Iraq first appeared in 2004 when Abū Muṣʿab al-Zarqāwī, a Jordanian-born militant already leading insurgent attacks in Iraq, formed an alliance with al-Qaeda, pledging his group’s allegiance to Osama bin Laden in return for bin Laden’s endorsement as the leader of al-Qaeda’s franchise in Iraq.

Moron.... how does a militant group "already leading insurgent attacks" when they aligned with Al-Qaeda, "pledge to Osama from the start??"

On top of all your other maladies, lacking common sense is among them.

And earlier, you idiotically claim Al-Qaeda in Iraq was nothing in Iraq, yet again, your own link reveals your ignorance...

Al-Zarqāwī, who quickly came to be regarded as one of the most destructive militants in Iraq, organized a wave of attacks, often suicide bombings, that targeted security forces, government institutions, and Iraqi civilians.

Al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006. His initiative in Iraq was defeated. What was left of his group went into hiding in Syria. You cannot call yourself Al-Qaeda unless you are aligned with Osama at the time. Al-Zarqawi's earlier group was not being funded by Al-Qaeda.

AQI didn't have the power to hold land in Iraq after the death of their leader and they never built the caliphate they were looking for during the Iraq war.

By 2009-2010, AQI was almost completely in Syria and had run out of power. They were basically in exile from the new Iraqi government.

Obama then used them to widen the civil war in Syria. He provided them training at our base in Jordan. He armed and provisioned the group. He gave them the influx of capital they needed for a reboot.

He gave them what they needed to grow again.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You're too insane. :cuckoo:

So much so, you can't even realize I'm talking about the Iraq war; while you're talking about the civil war in Syria years later.

Despite your delusions, Al-Qaeda in Iraq led the civil war on the side of the Sunni's as early as 2004 in Iraq. Al Nusra didn't even exist at that time.

Too funny. You have to really stretch the truth to suit you purposes.

Al-Qaeda existed before the Iraq war and you guys sworn up and down that there were not in bed with Saddam.
Now you want to tell us that they only entered Iraq and had enough influence there to be the main belligerents in the Iraq war.

They were not. The Baathist and Iraqi Nationalist were the main opposition.

Get your shit straight already you lying ******* dumbass.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–11) - Wikipedia



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now this is too funny... from your own link...

In response to a law allowing for the partitioning of Iraq into autonomous regions, members of the Mutayibeen Coalition (Khalf al-Mutayibeen[97]), a coalition of Sunni insurgent groups including Al Qaeda in Iraq, announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq encompassing parts of 6 of Iraq's 18 provinces on October 15, 2006

:dance:

They were defeated. On 13 October 2006, the MSC declared the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), comprising Iraq's six mostly Sunni Arab governorates: Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah al-Din, Ninawa, and "other parts of the governorate of Babel", with Abu Omar al-Baghdadi being announced as the self-proclaimed state's Emir.

Multiple groups were claiming the same shit but were all defeated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"They were defeated."

Imbecile... if they were defeated, how'd they become known as ISI?

You're allergic to thinking, ain'tcha?

All the land they claimed remained a part of Iraq at the end of the war. They were hiding in Syria when Obama claimed victory in Iraq.

You just can't deal with reality. I post outside sources and you just spout off liberal propaganda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have no idea what you're talking about. :cuckoo:

They were still fighting until 2007 when Bush paid them to stop. They've accepted that offer. When the war was winding down as a result of that and the surge, Bush signed an agreement with Iraq to pull all of our troops out the end of 2011. It was that agreement, which Obama honored, which resulted in our troops being pulled out.
 
Nope, you're the one who was thinking of it. You can't blame others for your own shortcomings, I don't care how desperate you are to shirk personal responsibility.

Keep lying and sucking dumbfuck. It's all you are good for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unlike you, I'm a married heterosexual. So's my wife. Ironically, the one who can't stop thinking of sucking is you. :ack-1:


The only ones not sucking are me and your wife.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yet, the only one who can't stop thinking about it is you. :lol:

Post your sources not your opinion from drinking the lib kool-aid. Don't blame me for the bad taste left in your mouth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dumbfuck.... what taste? I'm using YOUR links to prove you wrong.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
 
LOLOL

Your insanity is even worse than I thought. :ack-1:

I said Al-Qaeda in Iraq, not Al-Qaeda. There is a difference, which obviously eludes you.

1233796371590.gif


That you keep plowing through this debate by leading with your chin and your ignorance is all anyone here needs to see you have no ******* clue about what's even being discussed.

There isn't a difference. More bending of the truth to suit your story. You are a delusional person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLOL

That you don't know the difference only serves to highlight your ignorance.

giphy.gif


Moron, Al-Qaeda in Iraq started as a terrorist group which went into Iraq after we invaded and then devoted themselves to Al-Qaeda. They weren't part of Al-Qaeda prior to that. In 2006, they changed their name again to ISI (ISIL, before appending Syria).

You might actually be the dumbest **** on this forum to not know any of this.

Keep making shit up. They were pledged to Osama from the start. That is why they were known as Al Qaeda.

You are living in a make believe alternate reality.
The delusions are strong in you.

al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) | militant group




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dumbfuck, do you even bother to read your own links? :eusa_doh: Your own link doesn't say that...

Al-Qaeda in Iraq first appeared in 2004 when Abū Muṣʿab al-Zarqāwī, a Jordanian-born militant already leading insurgent attacks in Iraq, formed an alliance with al-Qaeda, pledging his group’s allegiance to Osama bin Laden in return for bin Laden’s endorsement as the leader of al-Qaeda’s franchise in Iraq.

Moron.... how does a militant group "already leading insurgent attacks" when they aligned with Al-Qaeda, "pledge to Osama from the start??"

On top of all your other maladies, lacking common sense is among them.

And earlier, you idiotically claim Al-Qaeda in Iraq was nothing in Iraq, yet again, your own link reveals your ignorance...

Al-Zarqāwī, who quickly came to be regarded as one of the most destructive militants in Iraq, organized a wave of attacks, often suicide bombings, that targeted security forces, government institutions, and Iraqi civilians.

Al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006. His initiative in Iraq was defeated. What was left of his group went into hiding in Syria. You cannot call yourself Al-Qaeda unless you are aligned with Osama at the time. Al-Zarqawi's earlier group was not being funded by Al-Qaeda.

AQI didn't have the power to hold land in Iraq after the death of their leader and they never built the caliphate they were looking for during the Iraq war.

By 2009-2010, AQI was almost completely in Syria and had run out of power. They were basically in exile from the new Iraqi government.

Obama then used them to widen the civil war in Syria. He provided them training at our base in Jordan. He armed and provisioned the group. He gave them the influx of capital they needed for a reboot.

He gave them what they needed to grow again.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
More bullshit you're making up. Like other terrorist groups, killed leaders are replaced and their fighting continues. Again, from your own link...

Al-Qaeda in Iraq remained active even after al-Zarqāwī was killed by U.S. forces in 2006. The organization was severely weakened in 2007, however, after Sunni tribes paid by the United States began to form militias known as “Awakening Councils” to expel al-Qaeda in Iraq from their territories.

:dance:
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom