Blasts rock 3 churches, 3 hotels in Sri Lanka; multiple fatalities reported

[SweetSue92]

Ghandi was no saint.

I'm sure he wasn't, but to kick out the British with nothing but persuasion is something I definitely admire.

He was a pedo.

Now why don't you prove that, provide a link to back up your disgusting hatred.

Since when do you accept proof? And links rarely prove anything.

I accept poof from legitimate sites, I check them out. Now how about some proof?? I also list facts.

Your facts are whatever you want to feed your own hatred. We know this

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month.

No, that's terrible logic. One does not have to commit a terorist act to believe the terrorists are doing good work, or to contribute to an environment that fosters and creates terrorists. That logic is horrible, and it isn't getting any better with repetition. You discredit yourself with such a stupid argument.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

A rare moment we will agree

 

[Issa]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

Have you asked yourself why terrorism flourished especially after the invasion of Muslim countries ?
Iraq had no terrorists
Lybia no terrorists dared to live under Gaddafi
Syria also had no terrorism activities
Afghanistan the mujahedeen and al Qaeda were trained and supported directly by the US, I wonder what happened there?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

Have you asked yourself why terrorism flourished especially after the invasion of Muslim countries ?
Iraq had no terrorists
Lybia no terrorists dared to live under Gaddafi
Syria also had no terrorism activities
Afghanistan the mujahedeen and al Qaeda were trained and supported directly by the US, I wonder what happened there?

You ill informed dupe, Saddam was a terrorist

 

[Issa]

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month.

No, that's terrible logic. One does not have to commit a terorist act to believe the terrorists are doing good work, or to contribute to an environment that fosters and creates terrorists. That logic is horrible, and it isn't getting any better with repetition. You discredit yourself with such a stupid argument.

Well following your claim that Islam tea hes terrorism, I think if that was true 1.6 billion Muslim terrorists are not that active are they ? Because there are only few terror acts.

When a country decides to bomb and invade other countries is it terrorism or not?

 

[SweetSue92]

That was NOT Gandhi's stated mission. He claimed that without Britain the fighting between the Beasts and the rest of Indians would cease. He made Britain a scapegoat for the inability of Beasts to integrate into any society or live in peace with ANY people. Yes, Britain left and tens of thousands starved to death as a result. What an amazing accomplishment.

If anyone here could possibly find a way to hate and twist Gandhi's actions into murder, I suppose it would be you.

Ghandi was no saint.

I'm sure he wasn't, but to kick out the British with nothing but persuasion is something I definitely admire.

He was a pedo.

Now why don't you prove that, provide a link to back up your disgusting hatred.

Mohammed actually married a nine year old girl. I wouldn't call Mohammed a "pedo" personally, but you call this FACT "disgusting hatred". Meanwhile, Penny, you call Evangelicals filth, tell people they're a certain way bc they're from the South and just wipe out history you don't like. And more and more and more.

Take a look in the mirror.

 

[MindWars]

This is Zahran Hashim, one of the terrorists identified responsible for at least one of the bombings in Sri Lanka. Here is him preaching with a background of Non-Muslim countries in flames, saying the following:

“Islam doesn't permit standing up for National flag. Hindus, Christians, Buddhists as are Non-believers. *Allah created this land for Muslims*; Kafirs have the right to live, only Muslims have the right to rule. Loyalty of Muslims should only be for the Nation ruled by Muslims. It's a sin to live in the West, land of disbelief. Even if a disbeliever does good things, i hate him, because he is a non-believer.”

 

[Issa]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

Have you asked yourself why terrorism flourished especially after the invasion of Muslim countries ?
Iraq had no terrorists
Lybia no terrorists dared to live under Gaddafi
Syria also had no terrorism activities
Afghanistan the mujahedeen and al Qaeda were trained and supported directly by the US, I wonder what happened there?

You ill informed dupe, Saddam was a terrorist

Ever attacked the US to have his country invaded and thousands of citizens killed and the whole country collapsed a d became a heaven for terrorism ?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month.

No, that's terrible logic. One does not have to commit a terorist act to believe the terrorists are doing good work, or to contribute to an environment that fosters and creates terrorists. That logic is horrible, and it isn't getting any better with repetition. You discredit yourself with such a stupid argument.

Well following your claim that Islam tea hes terrorism, I think if that was true 1.6 billion Muslim terrorists are not that active are they ? Because there are only few terror acts.

When a country decides to bomb and invade other countries is it terrorism or not?

Muslims committed 9/11

Don't start none, won't be none

Facts are pesky, eh?

 

[SweetSue92]

A review of Evangelical Christianity in Sri Lanka: The Politics of Growth, by Orlando Woods

Orlando Woods’s dissertation interprets the politics of evangelical Christian growth in Sri Lanka by framing proselytization via a religious economy. Situating his study with the rise of a Buddhist political elite after the 1980s, Woods states that the “moral impetus” for the dissertation is his “belief in the freedom of religious choice” over and against the Sri Lankan state’s attempts to restrict evangelical conversions, even while problematizing some of the coercive proselytization tactics used by evangelicals under the state’s radar (p. 3).

Accordingly, Woods is impelled to better understand the ethics of proselytization and the rise of anti-Christian politics in a “geo-religious” zone marked by two centuries of colonial Christian missionary activity. In so doing, he combines two theoretical constructs. First, he borrows from sociologist Fenggang Yang’s argument that there are differentiated religious markets, some of which are regulated by the state and some of which are more privatized and informal. Second, he modifies Anthony Giddens’s structuration theory to demonstrate that evangelical Christian growth can happen in Sri Lanka despite a hostile regulatory environment because evangelicals take advantage of multiple arenas to advance their conversionary agenda.

Woods’s central argument is that evangelical activity in Sri Lanka is best understood as agency within a structural mosaic. Moving between different niche markets to increase their religious presence, evangelicals have grown in competition to other religious groups, provoking the rise of a Buddhist right that construes this growth as a threat. Woods develops the theoretical underpinnings of this economic structure in Chapter 2. Drawing from Anthony Giddens and Nigel Thrift, he emphasizes the “heterogeneity of ‘structure’” that allows for evangelicals in Sri Lanka to cross structural categories of religion, sociality, culture, and the economy in order to evangelize in multiple geographical spheres (p. 39).

Evangelical Christianity in Sri Lanka
----------------------------------------------------------

The rise of the Evangelicals in France is also the reason for fight against Christianity.

The Evangelicals in the US are the main cause of division in the US as well.

Liberal filth like you is the cause of the division in the USA.

Nope, the evangelicals. Always trying to stir things up about abortion, gays, whatever they can. They are like the far right , pretending religious zealots.

More disgusting posts from Penny

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

Have you asked yourself why terrorism flourished especially after the invasion of Muslim countries ?
Iraq had no terrorists
Lybia no terrorists dared to live under Gaddafi
Syria also had no terrorism activities
Afghanistan the mujahedeen and al Qaeda were trained and supported directly by the US, I wonder what happened there?

You ill informed dupe, Saddam was a terrorist

Ever attacked the US to have his country invaded and thousands of citizens killed and the whole country collapsed a d became a heaven for terrorism ?

Ask the Kurds, shitstain

 

[Issa]

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month.

No, that's terrible logic. One does not have to commit a terorist act to believe the terrorists are doing good work, or to contribute to an environment that fosters and creates terrorists. That logic is horrible, and it isn't getting any better with repetition. You discredit yourself with such a stupid argument.

Well following your claim that Islam tea hes terrorism, I think if that was true 1.6 billion Muslim terrorists are not that active are they ? Because there are only few terror acts.

When a country decides to bomb and invade other countries is it terrorism or not?

Muslims committed 9/11

Don't start none, won't be none

Facts are pesky, eh?

The US invaded tons of countries killing 5housands, does that all Americans to blame ?
9/11 was committed by mentally I'll individuals they didnt get an endorsement from all muslims to do what they did.

 

[miketx]

And me and 99% dont agree with that.

Silly lie you just pulled out of your ass. 99%? No.

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month. But most of us dont we just wanna go with our daily lives. But let's not forget about state terror, using soldiers, war planes and invasion is an act of terror as well. Right ?

Ghandi was no saint.

I'm sure he wasn't, but to kick out the British with nothing but persuasion is something I definitely admire.

He was a pedo.

Now why don't you prove that, provide a link to back up your disgusting hatred.

Since when do you accept proof? And links rarely prove anything.

I accept poof from legitimate sites, I check them out. Now how about some proof??

You list regurgitated media sources that may or may not be factual. YOU have no way to verify them.

 

[Issa]

That's like saying Timothy McVeigh represent christianity

No it isnt. Please tell me the christian verse that directed mcveigh to bomb government buildings. Go ahead.

Sure, we can find evil nonsense in the bible, including instructions to kille infidels. But christianity has benefitted from secular reformation that missed Islam. So, islam requires more of our attention right now.

Your equivocating nonsense is counter productive. Islam needs a reformation, and peole like you makimg themselves human shields to protect against criticism of the horrible ideas in Islam hurts that effort.

Have you asked yourself why terrorism flourished especially after the invasion of Muslim countries ?
Iraq had no terrorists
Lybia no terrorists dared to live under Gaddafi
Syria also had no terrorism activities
Afghanistan the mujahedeen and al Qaeda were trained and supported directly by the US, I wonder what happened there?

You ill informed dupe, Saddam was a terrorist

Ever attacked the US to have his country invaded and thousands of citizens killed and the whole country collapsed a d became a heaven for terrorism ?

Ask the Kurds, shitstain

It was an Iraqi issue, the US fabricated a reason 5o invade Iraq causing death and chaos.

 

[miketx]

1.6 billion muslims if just 1% believed in terrorism you will have 100s of blasts every month.

No, that's terrible logic. One does not have to commit a terorist act to believe the terrorists are doing good work, or to contribute to an environment that fosters and creates terrorists. That logic is horrible, and it isn't getting any better with repetition. You discredit yourself with such a stupid argument.

Well following your claim that Islam tea hes terrorism, I think if that was true 1.6 billion Muslim terrorists are not that active are they ? Because there are only few terror acts.

When a country decides to bomb and invade other countries is it terrorism or not?

Muslims committed 9/11

Don't start none, won't be none

Facts are pesky, eh?

The US invaded tons of countries killing 5housands, does that all Americans to blame ?
9/11 was committed by mentally I'll individuals they didnt get an endorsement from all muslims to do what they did.

prove it stain.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I wouldn't call Mohammed a "pedo" personally

That is the very definition of a pedophile.

 

[OldLady]

This is Zahran Hashim, one of the terrorists identified responsible for at least one of the bombings in Sri Lanka. Here is him preaching with a background of Non-Muslim countries in flames, saying the following:

“Islam doesn't permit standing up for National flag. Hindus, Christians, Buddhists as are Non-believers. *Allah created this land for Muslims*; Kafirs have the right to live, only Muslims have the right to rule. Loyalty of Muslims should only be for the Nation ruled by Muslims. It's a sin to live in the West, land of disbelief. Even if a disbeliever does good things, i hate him, because he is a non-believer.”

View attachment 257164

Link to where he's been identified responsible? Maybe it's late breaking ?

 

[SweetSue92]

I wouldn't call Mohammed a "pedo" personally

That is the very definition of a pedophile.

I wouldn't, literally, call him a pedophile personally. I would point out that he married a 9 yo along with many other things. Mostly I don't do it because I don't think it's effective, just my personal choice. But not because it's not factual.

 

[Penelope]

I wouldn't call Mohammed a "pedo" personally

That is the very definition of a pedophile.

No the real definition of a pedo is trump looking at a young girl sexually at an escalator saying in 10 years he will be dating her. What was she about 6 or 8?