Look, the documents may be redacted, but if a person were to bring a case against any of the perps, then the document specific to the case might be ordered unredacted, otherwise if it had possible evidentiary value to it.
So in summary the document could be unredacted by order of the court (I guess), and submitted as evidence that might coinside with other evidence during a trial or hearing right ?
The left (I think) is loving the redactions, because they think that there is more power in conspiracies created to ruin somebody, than there is in the actual truth, otherwise if the redactions were removed and they still didn't have their orange bad man, and it's all because he's innocent and they can't make it look like he's not through conspiracy theories run amuck, then they are left out in the wide open with their narrative crushed.........