Birthright Citizenship…Arguments to begin this week at the Supreme Court.

They were illegal aliens.garding
Smuggled into the country, just like the people trucked across the Mexican border.

And they were intended to be included in the 14th amendment.
If you have a cogent argument to make, why don't you make it? Your fatuous assertions regarding any slaves that might have been illegally imported after 1807 are rendered moot by their subsequent emancipation and citizenship. If there was a similar law or amendment that did the same for all current illegals, you might have a point. But you don't.

Your word games are getting tiresome.
 
What few people really understand is that the USA is actually controlled by a handful of very wealthy, powerful oligarchs. Whatever takes place is ALWAYS in THEIR best interests. Government is run By The Oligarchs, For the Oligarchs. Period.

The manipulation of our so called elected officials and our political and justice systems is at their whim.
Understand that and everything else will make sense.
I just wish I was one of them since the vast majority are ok being subjects.
 
Nope, only if they escaped their masters.................

Now you're getting ridiculous.
Illegally imported slaves were illegal aliens whether they escaped from, or remained with the custody of those who paid for their illegal entry.
 
If you have a cogent argument to make, why don't you make it? Your fatuous assertions regarding any slaves that might have been illegally imported after 1807 are rendered moot by their subsequent emancipation and citizenship. If there was a similar law or amendment that did the same for all current illegals, you might have a point. But you don't.

Your word games are getting tiresome.
Actually the emancipation (13th amendment)
And citizenship (14th amendment)
applied to all slaves, both those legally in the country and those illegally in the country.
The 14th amendment made no distinction between those legally here, and those illegally here, and thus applied to both those that legally entered the country and those that illegally entered the country.

And if that was their intent when they wrote it in the 1800's, that is still the biding intent today.
 
What few people really understand is that the USA is actually controlled by a handful of very wealthy, powerful oligarchs. Whatever takes place is ALWAYS in THEIR best interests. Government is run By The Oligarchs, For the Oligarchs. Period.

The manipulation of our so called elected officials and our political and justice systems is at their whim.
Roman Emperor Commodus

The RichKid Reich. Their fathers are too busy making money for trust funds and inheritances; they don't have time to control anything else.
 
Actually the emancipation (13th amendment)
And citizenship (14th amendment)
applied to all slaves,
That is correct. They applied to all SLAVES, not people who voluntarily enter the US without permission.
 
That's the current and longstanding legal definition, which is what laws go by.

It's no different than if the law says shall be fined $500,
Even if the lawmakers intended for the fine to be optional.
The judge has to interpret shall by the legal definition of shall.
The Supreme Court will rule on what the law is, not what woke and/or self-advantaging lawyers interpret the law as being. I doubt you have any legal training in original intent nor do I. But I have studied it, taken some course work on it. Have you? I hope the Supreme Court justices have.
 
The Supreme Court will rule on what the law is, not what woke and/or self-advantaging lawyers interpret the law as being. I doubt you have any legal training in original intent nor do I. But I have studied it, taken some course work on it. Have you? I hope the Supreme Court justices have.
So what happens when original intent differs from the clear text of what was ushered out.

If a president intended to only grant clemency, but he signs a full pardon instead, does his intent override the clear text?
 
They were illegal aliens.
Smuggled into the country, just like the people trucked across the Mexican border.

And they were intended to be included in the 14th amendment.
Race-Treason Is Motivated by Greed

That was a special case and had nothing to do with illegality. The Radical Republicans wanted to punish Whites and replace them with any cheap labor they could get.
 
There were no illegal aliens at the time of our founders... there was no one that was illegal, for being here...basically....as long as you were willing to work or till the soil...and not a slave...

Our founders intent was to populate the nation and increase our citizenry at the time.

There is nothing in the 14th that shows their intent for illegal crossers, there were no illegal crossers.

So, the plain language of the amendment has to be used.

Are you afraid the majority of people in the United States would not support an amendment to change the 14th?
Yes. The Democrats are nefarious.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom