Birthright Citizenship…Arguments to begin this week at the Supreme Court.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Then why is Trump going after so many non-criminals.
It seems his excuse is that the criminals hide from ICE.
While the non-criminals are found where they work, or go to immigration hearings.

Squatters get squished

 

[Unkotare]

Children born to persons not here legally are citizens of their parents' country.
...

As it stands right now, anyone born here IS a US citizen, and there is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Then why is Trump going after so many non-criminals.
It seems his excuse is that the criminals hide from ICE.
While the non-criminals are found where they work, or go to immigration hearings.

Nineteen Eighty-Four Called. It Wants Its NewSpeak Back.

"Non-criminal illegals"? When we are subject to the jurisdiction of a political dictatorship, it can use any illogical phrasing it feels like using.

If sane people object, they should be reminded that BIG BROTHERHOOD IS WATCHING YOU.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Cool story. Did you predict them over turning Roe V Wade? No offense but your area of study seems to be being how to be a pedantic grammer nazi.

As a matter of fact, I did. Justice Ginsberg predicted it many years ago.

At least I can spell grammar correctly.

How many times does it have to be pointed out that the founding fathers had zero to do with the writing of the 14th amendment? It was written post-civil war to deal with the citizen status of freed slaves. It's a reconstruction amendment and has zero to do with people in the country illegally. It was written to ensure southern states were required to give formerly enslaved people Constitutional rights.

The reason it doesn't apply to illegals is because there were no illegals at that time. The amendment did not specify slaves.

Any natural born person was a citizen before the amendment to as far as qualifications to be President. Anyone born here or even living here was a citizen. Alexander Hamilton was ineligible because he was born in the British West Indies and not the colonies. Otherwise, he might have followed Washington. He was Secretary of the Treasury which required he be a citizen. Did you know that little factoid?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

We really need an amendment that requires birthright citizenship only if one of your parents is a citizen at least.

Now you're talking! Great post!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sure, we do. Diplomats are still breaking the law they are just shielded by diplomatic immunity; however, the US can expel them, or their country can rescind said immunity and that person can then be charged. The idea that diplomats can just go around willy nilly breaking the law without consequence is ******* moronic. The purpose of diplomatic immunity is to shield diplomats from harassment, from the host country or taking them into custody as a negotiating tactic not to place them above the law.

Your knowledge on this topic is superficial. A diplomat or family member is usually expelled by the host country. We do it all the time to the Russians we suspect of being spies. Lethal Weapon II is a Hollyweird primer, if you're into that hype about diplomatic immunity. I figure that is about your speed.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do you think we have sovereignty over the illegal squirted out in the lettuce field by her illegal mother.

Can you deport the mother? If so, you have jurisdiction in the terms of the law.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And why aren't the children of illegal Mexicans working the fields? Mexico considers them Mexican citizens.

That makes absolutely no sense. Please try again in English with some forethought.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sure we do, they are "within" our jurisdiction.

And we can deport them too.

The term is to expel.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your reasoning is circular I’ll ask again. Why do you think we have sovereignty over the illegal birthed by her illegal mother on US soil?

As I said earlier. If you can deport the mother, you have jurisdiction. The SCOTUS will cite this in all likelihood.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If the diplomats home country waives DI, he's going to court.

Not very likely.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No I don't have a degree in history but I am a historian. No I do not have education certification but I have enough education to know that a real educator would argue with logic, reason, and facts instead of childish personal insults and is capable of reading what another wrote instead of making up your own interpretation of what the other person said, intended and/or who he/she is.

Have a lovely day.

I accept your surrender with glee. You lose.

 

[BluesLegend]

Have you told a filthy ILLEGAL to get out of our country today? If not get to work!

 

[Unkotare]

No I don't have a degree in history but I am a historian. No I do not have education certification ...

 

[BluesLegend]

Nineteen Eighty-Four Called. It Wants Its NewSpeak Back.

"Non-criminal illegals"?

Democrats LOVE to lie and one of their favorite ways is to stamp a new label on something that's a blatant lie.

 

[Couchpotato]

Your knowledge on this topic is superficial. A diplomat or family member is usually expelled by the host country. We do it all the time to the Russians we suspect of being spies.

That's what I said. Your reading comprehension is terrible for someone who was supposedly a teacher.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

All based upon a questionable interpretation out of Kim Ark Wong vs the US.

Well, except all of that statement is incorrect.

 

[BluesLegend]

As it stands right now, anyone born here IS a US citizen, and there is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

We'll just go on calling anchor babies anchor babies and work to get them deported and put a stop to this abomination.

 

[Couchpotato]

As a matter of fact, I did. Justice Ginsberg predicted it many years ago.

At least I can spell garmmar correctly.

Are you sure about that?

 

[Foxfyre]

I accept your surrender with glee. You lose.

There is nobody more delusional than a woke leftist. If I surrender I say so. You have no more ability to determine when or whether I surrender about anything than you know about the founding documents which apparently is nothing.

Again have a nice day.

P.S. Based on your posts and behavior, I have really REALLY serious doubts about whether you are or have ever been an educator. If you are/have been, God help your poor students.