Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Property From Clarence Thomas. The Justice Didn’t Disclose the Deal.

g5000

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2011
123,665
58,103
2,290
It just gets sleazier and sleazier.



In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.

The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.



Justice Thomas's mother still lives in the House the billionaire bought.


The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.

“He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”

[snip]


It’s unclear if Crow paid fair market value for the Thomas properties. Crow also bought several other properties on the street and paid significantly less than his deal with the Thomases. One example: In 2013, he bought a pair of properties on the same block — a vacant lot and a small house — for a total of $40,000.
 
It just gets sleazier and sleazier.



In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.

The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.


Disclose to whom? And why?

I guess if he had a taxable gain on the property, Justice Thomas would have to disclose it on his income tax. Do you have proof he had a gain that wasn't reported?
 
“Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”

Yeah.



Crow paid $133,363 for the properties. That’s substantially more than Thomas’ valuation. On a 2009 financial disclosure form, Thomas said his one-third stake in the three properties amounted to $15,000 or less.
 
Disclose to whom? And why?

I guess if he had a taxable gain on the property, Justice Thomas would have to disclose it on his income tax. Do you have proof he had a gain that wasn't reported?
From the OP link:

The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.


I suggest you read it.
 
From the OP link:

The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.


I suggest you read it.


Since the whole thing is so inconsequential, would you be satisfied if Justice Thomas just completed an amended form? After all, this didn't effect his actual work on the bench.
 
Since the whole thing is so inconsequential, would you be satisfied if Justice Thomas just completed an amended form? After all, this didn't effect his actual work on the bench.
Thomas has failed time and time again to disclose financial transactions he was supposed to disclose. He has filed amendments after amendments ONLY after getting caught.

At some point you have to hold the man accountable and impeach him.
'
 
Thomas has failed time and time again to disclose financial transactions he was supposed to disclose. He has filed amendments after amendments ONLY after getting caught.

At some point you have to hold the man accountable and impeach him.
'


Its a "no harm no foul" situation , a mere technicality. He wasn't "hiding" anything, you libs still knew about it.

Hardly a "high crime" which is what is required for impeachment. Not even a crime at all, at the very most a technical mistake.
 
Its a "no harm no foul" situation , a mere technicality. He wasn't "hiding" anything, you libs still knew about it.
No one knew about Thomas's free gifts from the billionaire until now.

This is not the first time he has not reported gifts or income. Not even the second time.

Since when are JUDGES, of all people, above the law?


Hardly a "high crime" which is what is required for impeachment. Not even a crime at all, at the very most a technical mistake.
High crimes and MISDEMEANORS, dipshit. You certainly have a very selective brain.

A mistake? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA! Do we really want a judge who can't even understand the most basic laws about disclosure? Seriously?

Are you really so stupid as to bleev Thomas's MULTIPLE infractions were "mistakes"?

I keep forgetting just how credulous you rubes are, but then you keep reminding me.
 
It just gets sleazier and sleazier.



In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.

The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.



Justice Thomas's mother still lives in the House the billionaire bought.


The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.

“He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”

[snip]


It’s unclear if Crow paid fair market value for the Thomas properties. Crow also bought several other properties on the street and paid significantly less than his deal with the Thomases. One example: In 2013, he bought a pair of properties on the same block — a vacant lot and a small house — for a total of $40,000.
:eek:

 
From the OP link:

The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.


I suggest you read it.
Wasn't it his mother's house??

"The purchase included the two-bedroom home of the justice’s mother, Leola, which Crow’s firm then upgraded with $36,000 in renovations by an award-winning local architect, including a garage, a repaired roof, and a new fence and gate."


So you're a lying fuckwit, shiteater!!!

Greg
 
Wasn't it his mother's house??

"The purchase included the two-bedroom home of the justice’s mother, Leola, which Crow’s firm then upgraded with $36,000 in renovations by an award-winning local architect, including a garage, a repaired roof, and a new fence and gate."


So you're a lying fuckwit, shiteater!!!

Greg
The purchase included three properties, one of which was Thomas's mother's house. And she still lives there.

The properties were purchased at a price almost triple the value of what Thomas has claimed the properties are worth.

The man is a crook who takes bribes.
 
Crooked Clarence failed to disclose luxury vacations provided by a billionaire. Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

Crooked Clarence failed to disclose a 2014 real estate deal. Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

Crooked Clarence failed to disclose his wife's income from the Heritage Foundation. He had to amend TWENTY YEARS of disclosures! Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

If a JUDGE can't figure out how to fill out a simple legal form, what does that say about his qualifications to sit on the highest court in the land?

It's obvious he was deliberately concealing things he was required to report.

It's time to impeach.
 
Crooked Clarence failed to disclose luxury vacations provided by a billionaire. Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

Crooked Clarence failed to disclose a 2014 real estate deal. Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

Crooked Clarence failed to disclose his wife's income from the Heritage Foundation. He had to amend TWENTY YEARS of disclosures! Oops! Just a mistake! :lol:

If a JUDGE can't figure out how to fill out a simple legal form, what does that say about his qualifications to sit on the highest court in the land?

It's obvious he was deliberately concealing things he was required to report.

It's time to impeach.
LIAR!! He was not REQUIRED to declare personal gifts you drongo!!!
 
“He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”
That Thomas is corrupt and dishonest comes as no surprise; Thomas has the same contempt for ethics as he has for settled, accepted precedent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top