Hey fucktard racist, hospitality. Try to keep up dumbfuck. The plane and yacht are owned by his friend moron. You have yet to show anything proving your bullshit. As usual.
Someone needs to show the law that Justice Thomas allegedly broke, and proof that he allegedly broke it. Show the text of the law that you think he broke not a link to all the federal regulations.
Poor crybaby racist doesn't like it when people use his own shit against him. I don’t care about your use of controlled substances. Explains some things. Except your blatant racism. Now quit running like a coward and post some proof of your bullshit. Hospitality does not need to be reported, so don’t even try that loser.
Poor crybaby racist doesn't like it when people use his own shit against him. I don’t care about your use of controlled substances. Explains some things. Except your blatant racism. Now quit running like a coward and post some proof of your bullshit. Hospitality does not need to be reported, so don’t even try that loser.
I never look at just links. If there is something in the link that you think proves your point, you would quote it. It takes about three seconds. If it seemed to support your point, I would then open the link to look at more.
But, I will make an exception and look at this link, since you think it so clearly supports your accusation against Thomas, and I don't want to be accused of closing my eyes to opposing arguments. Wait one . . .
*reads entire link*
Ah yes. I see what you mean. But you missed an exception that covers Justice Thomas' action. It is right here:
These regulations govern the filing of, and access to, financial disclosure reports by judges and judiciary employees under Financial Disclosure Requirements of Federal Personnel (5 U.S.C. §§ 13101-13111). The regulations on access are provided in Chapter 5.
I never look at just links. If there is something in the link that you think proves your point, you would quote it. It takes about three seconds. If it seemed to support your point, I would then open the link to look at more.
But, I will make an exception and look at this link, since you think it so clearly supports your accusation against Thomas, and I don't want to be accused of closing my eyes to opposing arguments. Wait one . . .
*reads entire link*
Ah yes. I see what you mean. But you missed an exception that covers Justice Thomas' action. It is right here:
These regulations govern the filing of, and access to, financial disclosure reports by judges and judiciary employees under Financial Disclosure Requirements of Federal Personnel (5 U.S.C. §§ 13101-13111). The regulations on access are provided in Chapter 5.
Impeach Justice Thomas
quotes: Over the last two decades, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has reported on required financial disclosure forms that his family received rental income totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars from a firm called Ginger, Ltd., Partnership.
But that company — a Nebraska real estate firm launched in the 1980s by his wife and her relatives — has not existed since 2006.
Since that time, however, Thomas has continued to report income from the defunct company — between $50,000 and $100,000 annually in recent years
In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.
The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.
Justice Thomas's mother still lives in the House the billionaire bought.
The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.
“He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”
[snip]
It’s unclear if Crow paid fair market value for the Thomas properties. Crow also bought several other properties on the street and paid significantly less than his deal with the Thomases. One example: In 2013, he bought a pair of properties on the same block — a vacant lot and a small house — for a total of $40,000.
In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.
The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.
Justice Thomas's mother still lives in the House the billionaire bought.
The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.
“He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”
[snip]
It’s unclear if Crow paid fair market value for the Thomas properties. Crow also bought several other properties on the street and paid significantly less than his deal with the Thomases. One example: In 2013, he bought a pair of properties on the same block — a vacant lot and a small house — for a total of $40,000.