Billboards telling troops to obey only lawful orders go up near Florida military base

How about the orders given that are the subject of the September 2nd video the pentagon refuses to let everyone's representative in congress see.
Killing America's enemies is what the military is for.

Democrats protect America's enemies and attack America's military.

Democrats = traitors
 
Sounds like democrats want to prosecute soldiers for killing enemy combatants.

Are democrats planning a naval attack on America?

I know the democrats don't like their poison shipments interfered with.

Is this all about the drug boats?
Only if they do so in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the Laws of War.
No Quarter orders are illegal orders.
 
Why can't you give Americans an example of an order you are afraid the troops might obey?

It really seems like the democrats are planning massive attacks on Americans and want to prevent the military from responding.
Exactly. What enemy democrats are trying to create is a military climate of rebellion. More, to have the military ally with enemies, starting with refusing to bomb narcoboats.
 
, "no quarter" orders, meaning orders to kill all enemy combatants without accepting surrender, are illegal under international humanitarian law (laws of war) and considered a war crime, as they prohibit harming those surrendering or unable to fight (hors de combat). While historically debated, modern international law, including the Geneva Conventions and customary law, clearly forbids ordering or threatening to give no quarter, making it a serious violation of the laws of armed conflict.
 
Only if they do so in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the Laws of War.
No Quarter orders are illegal orders.
And democrats are planning an event they believe will cause such orders to be given.

Americans won't buy it when you try it.
 
'A billboard campaign telling troops to obey only lawful orders in defiance of the Trump administration has launched in Florida near a military base.

Nonprofits Defiance.org and WhistleblowerAid.org launched the campaign at the MacDill Air Force base in Tampa, urging serving troops to “Obey Only Lawful Orders” amid the Trump administration’s lethal strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, which have so far killed more than 100 people.

“We’re making sure troops know their rights and that they’re not alone if they’re told to cross the line,” Miles Taylor, a former Department of Homeland Security official in President Donald Trump’s first administration, said in a statement to 10 Tampa Bay.

“The president may be the commander-in-chief, but even he is bound by the law,” Taylor added. “This campaign is a constitutional alarm bell to remind our servicemembers of that.” The organizations are offering troops legal advice and providing whistleblower hotlines.'


Unfortunately, those serving in the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean haven’t gotten the message.

They’re obeying unlawful orders every time they attack civilian boats absent evidence of wrongdoing.

The criminal Trump regime has nothing but contempt for the law.
Funny. Good luck.
 
Shut up, stupid.

It's in the enlistment oath. Right there in the oath.

So you enjoy your little cult folly. You're embarrassing yourself for your rape god.
Make me shut up you total mushmind. I gave you the law. I gave you the exact procedure. It's not just a woke mind virus. It's a democrat brain parasite.
 
, "no quarter" orders, meaning orders to kill all enemy combatants without accepting surrender, are illegal under international humanitarian law (laws of war) and considered a war crime, as they prohibit harming those surrendering or unable to fight (hors de combat). While historically debated, modern international law, including the Geneva Conventions and customary law, clearly forbids ordering or threatening to give no quarter, making it a serious violation of the laws of armed conflict.
Is that the same law that the Pals violated when they attacked Israel and murdered innocent women and children?
 
, "no quarter" orders, meaning orders to kill all enemy combatants without accepting surrender, are illegal under international humanitarian law (laws of war) and considered a war crime, as they prohibit harming those surrendering or unable to fight (hors de combat). While historically debated, modern international law, including the Geneva Conventions and customary law, clearly forbids ordering or threatening to give no quarter, making it a serious violation of the laws of armed conflict.

And you can prove that take no prisoner order was given?

No. You cant
 
Is that the same law that the Pals violated when they attacked Israel and murdered innocent women and children?
That you can find others breaking the law, doesn't make it alright for us to violate the law.
 
That you can find others breaking the law, doesn't make it alright for us to violate the law.
The point is your so called law is ineffective. When you start demanding the enemies of civilization obey your law, perhaps someone will take you seriously.
 
The point is your so called law is ineffective. When you start demanding the enemies of civilization obey your law, perhaps someone will take you seriously.
Until the number of murders in the US drops to ZERO.
The laws against murder in the US are just as ineffective.
That doesn't mean we give up enforcing it.
 
The point is your so called law is ineffective. When you start demanding the enemies of civilization obey your law, perhaps someone will take you seriously.
Actually, virtually every law is ineffective, as they don't prevent people from violating them.
Their effectiveness is in lessening the number of violations, and punishing those who still do.
 
The point is your so called law is ineffective. When you start demanding the enemies of civilization obey your law, perhaps someone will take you seriously.
It's as if you're advocating we go around wantonly murdering people, because others have gotten away with it.
 
15th post
Until the number of murders in the US drops to ZERO.
The laws against murder in the US are just as ineffective.
That doesn't mean we give up enforcing it.
The laws in the US are enforced by the US government. Who enforces your imaginary laws?
 
Actually, virtually every law is ineffective, as they don't prevent people from violating them.
Their effectiveness is in lessening the number of violations, and punishing those who still do.
Okay. Who is going to enforce you law against the US?
 
It's as if you're advocating we go around wantonly murdering people, because others have gotten away with it.
Why not? Why only hold the US accountable and allow others unaccountable?
 
Back
Top Bottom