Bill O'Reilly is such an awful man...

[Annie]

You say that, but I doubt you would feel the same if you were on the receiving end of Westboro's hatred. Oh and I don't expect an honest reply, honesty is something you left wing idiots seem to have trouble with. Case in point: Obama's promise of transparency and no back room deals, are just two examples of many of the lies Obama has told the American people. Yet the left still hang on his every word. Can you say IDIOTS? Because it's my opinion that every Obama support is a fucking idiot!

Not to be difficult, but did you actually read what he posted? He was in agreement, in a nullification sort of way.

Yes I read what he posted and the last sentence clarified his position.

Yep, it did.

 

[Modbert]

Doesn't take away from the facts presented.

I don't know about you, but I find it to be very easy to fudge the numbers I want when it comes to such a topic like the book was about. It's all about how you define charity.

So where's your link for those numbers anyway?

 

[Modbert]

Nope, it just flowed out like that.

What I care about are the 4+ million hits that come googling one of your "facts."

You jacked that word-for-word. In other words you plagiarized it.

Now how's about that link?

I thought only socialists plagiarized?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

How 'bout a link, cosmonaut?

Cosmonaut? What are you twelve?

Read a fucking book like "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." by Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University.

Nope, it just flowed out like that.

What I care about are the 4+ million hits that come googling one of your "facts."

You jacked that word-for-word. In other words you plagiarized it.

Now how's about that link?

Word for word straight out of the book.

 

[Modbert]

Word for word straight out of the book.

 

[Bfgrn]

On his show last night, which I rarely watch, he has said he will pick up the legal bill for the family of Matthew Snyder whose family have just lost a legal battle against that scumbag church who picket the funerals of our military.

That's $16,000 but it ain't over - because there's possibly another $90,000. Give if you can. Thanks.

But, you can help by contacting your local and state reps to support a law banning protestors from funerals. I believe in freedom of speech and the right to protest, but I believe the right to privacy of our war dead outweighs the right of others to protest AT THEIR FUNERALS. If you agree with me, please help the family to stop this nonsense now. The website below can help you find your local and state reps.


Here is my prayer for the members of the Westboro Church "May God have mercy on you because I won't. I hope you all burn in Hell."

Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder

Kudos to Billo the clown...

I'm glad to see even right wingers sometimes see right wing extremists like the homophobic Westboro freaks in the same light as normal citizens...

But what a coincidence Cali gal; you just happened to be watching Billo...

I have to admit, I was becoming rather skeptical after you posted information you claimed was accessed from 'places I get facts that are not open sources', then your tin foil conspiracy theory appeared on Glenn Beck's howdy doody hour... but your 'I rarely watch' disclaimer calmed my suspicions...

But one remains...I wonder if we'd see this abhorrence from Billo, Malkin and the right if Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder was a gay soldier...

Glenn Beck...

 

[Article 15]

Cosmonaut? What are you twelve?

Read a fucking book like "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." by Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University.

Nope, it just flowed out like that.

What I care about are the 4+ million hits that come googling one of your "facts."

You jacked that word-for-word. In other words you plagiarized it.

Now how's about that link?

Word for word straight out of the book.

I know this. Link up the George Will oped or something. Just pick a link, man.

Sheesh

 

[del]

I believe in freedom of speech and the right to protest, but I believe the right to privacy of our war dead outweighs the right of others to protest AT THEIR FUNERALS.

I could not possibly agree more.

I only note that my contempt for funeral protestors isn't limited to those who protest at military funerals.

If some protestor at a funeral gets killed by the mourners, and I am called to jury duty, that person is either going be found not guilty or that jury is going to be a hung jury.

You say that, but I doubt you would feel the same if you were on the receiving end of Westboro's hatred. Oh and I don't expect an honest reply, honesty is something you left wing idiots seem to have trouble with. Case in point: Obama's promise of transparency and no back room deals, are just two examples of many of the lies Obama has told the American people. Yet the left still hang on his every word. Can you say IDIOTS? Because it's my opinion that every Obama support is a fucking idiot!

Welcome to Reading Is Fundamental

give it a try

 

[maineman]

at the real heart of this issue is the basic notion of free speech. Free speech cannot be free only when we can comfortably tolerate what someone says. It must be free right up to the edge of shouting fire in a crowded theater. If it does not actually cause physical harm to someone, we allow it. As much as those "religious" assholes make my blood boil, our society gives them the right to speak whatever they want to. Banning THEIR particularly hateful brand of speech, while comforting to do so, only pushes us down a slippery slope, where the majority gets to decide what the minority has the "freedom" to say. Like it or not, those soldiers whose funerals are disrupted by these assholes fought and died to protect their right to do just that.

 

[WillowTree]

On his show last night, which I rarely watch, he has said he will pick up the legal bill for the family of Matthew Snyder whose family have just lost a legal battle against that scumbag church who picket the funerals of our military.

That's $16,000 but it ain't over - because there's possibly another $90,000. Give if you can. Thanks.

But, you can help by contacting your local and state reps to support a law banning protestors from funerals. I believe in freedom of speech and the right to protest, but I believe the right to privacy of our war dead outweighs the right of others to protest AT THEIR FUNERALS. If you agree with me, please help the family to stop this nonsense now. The website below can help you find your local and state reps.


Here is my prayer for the members of the Westboro Church "May God have mercy on you because I won't. I hope you all burn in Hell."

Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder

Kudos to Billo the clown...

I'm glad to see even right wingers sometimes see right wing extremists like the homophobic Westboro freaks in the same light as normal citizens...

But what a coincidence Cali gal; you just happened to be watching Billo...

I have to admit, I was becoming rather skeptical after you posted information you claimed was accessed from 'places I get facts that are not open sources', then your tin foil conspiracy theory appeared on Glenn Beck's howdy doody hour... but your 'I rarely watch' disclaimer calmed my suspicions...

But one remains...I wonder if we'd see this abhorrence from Billo, Malkin and the right if Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder was a gay soldier...

Glenn Beck...

voted the biggest lame assed fail post of the day.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Doesn't take away from the facts presented.

I don't know about you, but I find it to be very easy to fudge the numbers I want when it comes to such a topic like the book was about. It's all about how you define charity.

So where's your link for those numbers anyway?

Refute the facts instead of whining about the source. The source is Brooks' book and an article written by George Will a few years ago, I'm sure I can find you a link, but I'm not going to. And the reason is most of you liberal idiots never oblige when asked to do the same.

How you define charity? More proof of your idiocy.

 

[del]

at the real heart of this issue is the basic notion of free speech. Free speech cannot be free only when we can comfortably tolerate what someone says. It must be free right up to the edge of shouting fire in a crowded theater. If it does not actually cause physical harm to someone, we allow it. As much as those "religious" assholes make my blood boil, our society gives them the right to speak whatever they want to. Banning THEIR particularly hateful brand of speech, while comforting to do so, only pushes us down a slippery slope, where the majority gets to decide what the minority has the "freedom" to say. Like it or not, those soldiers whose funerals are disrupted by these assholes fought and died to protect their right to do just that.

i think that the emotional harm done to the relatives and loved ones at these funerals is just as great, if not greater than, the harm, physical or otherwise, that would be done by falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater, so it's over the edge by that litmus test.

if they want to voice their hateful opinions, they're free to do so, but although you can say whatever you want, you can't say it wherever you want.

one way or the other, they'll answer for it. it can't come too soon.

 

[Modbert]

Refute the facts instead of whining about the source. The source is Brooks' book and an article written by George Will a few years ago, I'm sure I can find you a link, but I'm not going to. And the reason is most of you liberal idiots never oblige when asked to do the same.

How you define charity? More proof of your idiocy.

I'm not whining about the source. Charity can be defined in several different ways. Brooks included giving to religious groups and churches as charity. Many people wouldn't. Such a clear difference makes a huge difference in the final numbers.

Even someone as batshit insane as you can see that.

 

[Article 15]

Doesn't take away from the facts presented.

I don't know about you, but I find it to be very easy to fudge the numbers I want when it comes to such a topic like the book was about. It's all about how you define charity.

So where's your link for those numbers anyway?

Refute the facts instead of whining about the source. The source is Brooks' book and an article written by George Will a few years ago, I'm sure I can find you a link, but I'm not going to. And the reason is most of you liberal idiots never oblige when asked to do the same.

How you define charity? More proof of your idiocy.

Dude, this ain't about some little argument, it's about our copyright policy.

You need to link that up. It isn't difficult.

This is the last time I'm going to ask you.

 

[California Girl]

I see that, yet again, partisan sniping and stupidity takes precedence over a genuine issue. Thanks all.

Goes to show the intellectual level of many - on both sides - that I can see only one actual genuine comment about the case.

That you guys would rather snipe at each other (and Bf who would rather snipe at me) than actually give a shit about what is happening to the Snyder family sickens me. Just sayin'.

 

[Ravi]

Hitler was kind to animals.

Next.

 

[WillowTree]

I see that, yet again, partisan sniping and stupidity takes precedence over a genuine issue. Thanks all.

Goes to show the intellectual level of many - on both sides - that I can see only one actual genuine comment about the case.

That you guys would rather snipe at each other (and Bf who would rather snipe at me) than actually give a shit about what is happening to the Snyder family sickens me. Just sayin'.

Mr. Snyder is a lucky man to have found a friend in Mr. O'Reilly.

 

[Modbert]

I see that, yet again, partisan sniping and stupidity takes precedence over a genuine issue. Thanks all.

Goes to show the intellectual level of many - on both sides - that I can see only one actual genuine comment about the case.

That you guys would rather snipe at each other (and Bf who would rather snipe at me) than actually give a shit about what is happening to the Snyder family sickens me. Just sayin'.

I would think everyone here or least the majority agree that these assholes don't have a right to picket the funerals. I don't think they do.

 

[California Girl]

at the real heart of this issue is the basic notion of free speech. Free speech cannot be free only when we can comfortably tolerate what someone says. It must be free right up to the edge of shouting fire in a crowded theater. If it does not actually cause physical harm to someone, we allow it. As much as those "religious" assholes make my blood boil, our society gives them the right to speak whatever they want to. Banning THEIR particularly hateful brand of speech, while comforting to do so, only pushes us down a slippery slope, where the majority gets to decide what the minority has the "freedom" to say. Like it or not, those soldiers whose funerals are disrupted by these assholes fought and died to protect their right to do just that.

I didn't suggest their freedom of speech should be banned - you fucking moron. I said they should not be allowed to protest AT THE FUNERAL.

 

[WillowTree]

I see that, yet again, partisan sniping and stupidity takes precedence over a genuine issue. Thanks all.

Goes to show the intellectual level of many - on both sides - that I can see only one actual genuine comment about the case.

That you guys would rather snipe at each other (and Bf who would rather snipe at me) than actually give a shit about what is happening to the Snyder family sickens me. Just sayin'.

I would think everyone here or least the majority agree that these assholes don't have a right to picket the funerals. I don't think they do.

hey! junior. back up and READ. then you may come back and discuss the ISSUE. and the reason for Mr. O'Reilly's OUTRage!