Bill in big trouble now. So is FBI

Meanwhile..this seems interesting:


Wut?? Gracie, you sayin' Bill Clinton avoided the draft?

Did you vote for president BoneSpurs? Are you voting for him in November? Let's see just how big of a hypocrite you really are...

:popcorn:


Are you voting for jesuit Joe, the pedo, lil faun, the perv? Would you let him sniff your hair?

:auiqs.jpg:

LOLOL

Now you think Biden is a pedophile too? Who ever accused him of that?

Here's the thing, you like using the media and sources to sling your bullcrap all over the place, and using it to accuse people of criminality too. So if your bullcrap spewed was true, then how come we don't see any criminal convictions, just your mouth running on this site making claims you can't back up with proof of indictments or jail time given ???? No it's all political with you, but you point the fingers at others as if you are the smart one. LOL.

LOLOL

You don't see criminal convictions?? You must be blind. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Papadopoulos, Cohen. Who did I leave out?

You don't see a biased, unethical Democrat Party, a weaponized DOJ, FBI under the Kenyan Muslim Obama Admin?? You must be blind and deaf. The only reason I don't add dumb is that you're certainly capable of talkin' shit.

LOL

Sorry, birther, they all committed crimes. Matters not that you're more concerned about their political party than you are that they are all convicted felons.

I'll give you Manafort and Cohen. Neither Flynn nor Stone nor Papadopoulos was given due process and should either be given retrials or pardons.

Faun said:
Who did I leave out?
Comey, McCabe, Yates, Clapper, Brennan, Page, Strzok, Schiff, Nadler, Weissmann, Obama, Biden, Rice, ad infinitum.

Of course they had due process. Had they not, they wouldn't have been convicted. Seems you don't even know what due process is. As far as the others, I didn't leave them out. None of them were ever indicted.
 
Meanwhile..this seems interesting:


Wut?? Gracie, you sayin' Bill Clinton avoided the draft?

Did you vote for president BoneSpurs? Are you voting for him in November? Let's see just how big of a hypocrite you really are...

:popcorn:


Are you voting for jesuit Joe, the pedo, lil faun, the perv? Would you let him sniff your hair?

:auiqs.jpg:

LOLOL

Now you think Biden is a pedophile too? Who ever accused him of that?

Here's the thing, you like using the media and sources to sling your bullcrap all over the place, and using it to accuse people of criminality too. So if your bullcrap spewed was true, then how come we don't see any criminal convictions, just your mouth running on this site making claims you can't back up with proof of indictments or jail time given ???? No it's all political with you, but you point the fingers at others as if you are the smart one. LOL.

LOLOL

You don't see criminal convictions?? You must be blind. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Papadopoulos, Cohen. Who did I leave out?

I'm talking about the big fish, otherwise the ones you love to accuse daily (Trump especially), but none of them are in jail. Not talking about all the little minions in government or politics that don't matter, but I'm talking about those you politically target for political reasons. Why are they not in jail if you are so sure of yourself or so smart about these things ???

Dumbfuck, a sitting president can't be indicted. Have you been paying attention at all?

Well then why do you waist so much time here as if he can be ???? Who is the real dummy here ? LOL, you are here calling Trump "impeached" Trump, otherwise making a fool of yourself everytime you do these things. Even though impeachment failed, you cling to it like the rabid partisan that you are. LOL

LOL

I call Impeached Trump because he was Impeached for a serious crime. And the impeachment hasn't exactly failed yet. Think of the election as an appeal of the Senate's acquittal.

Indeed he was impeached. That's the equivalent of being charged by a grand jury, not of being convicted of the charges. The trial was conducted in the Senate following the kangaroo court circus (grand jury proceedings) in the House.

President Trump was found NOT GUILTY.

The impeachment was a sham that served quite well in displaying to the American voters the absolute sleaziness of the Nancy "Lousy" Pelosi, Jerrold "Jabba" Nadler and Adam "Shitty" Schiff.

His impeachment will go down in history as the only partisan impeachment of the three we've had.

Your boy, Slick Willy was disbarred as a result of his impeachment.

BTW, your other boy, Obama is not a sitting president anymore.

LOL

And Clinton was found not guilty by the Senate of lying under oath.

I didn't say he was. But he was fined $90,000+ ...and paid another $25,000 fine.


The federal judge who found President Clinton in contempt of court last April levied a penalty of $90,686 against him Thursday, making him the first chief executive ever assessed such a payment.

In addition to agreeing to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license, Clinton accepted a $25,000 fine.

He also paid Paula Jones $850,000.
 
As far as the others, I didn't leave them out. None of them were ever indicted.
That doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes. And that fat lady hasn't started singing yet. One or more of them may be prosecuted before it's over.
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

 
As far as the others, I didn't leave them out. None of them were ever indicted.
That doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes. And that fat lady hasn't started singing yet. One or more of them may be prosecuted before it's over.
Of course it means they didn't commit crimes. They were investigated, and some investigations are ongoing, and to date,, no charges were brought forth.
 
Of course they had due process. Had they not, they wouldn't have been convicted.
Bullshit. Due process precludes the withholding of exculpatory evidence by the prosecutor.
If that were true, they would have had their convictions overturned. None of them have. So no, not bullshit.
Flynn's lawyer is working on having his conviction overturned. Stone is also appealing his conviction even though he's already received commutation.
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
 
Of course they had due process. Had they not, they wouldn't have been convicted.
Bullshit. Due process precludes the withholding of exculpatory evidence by the prosecutor.
If that were true, they would have had their convictions overturned. None of them have. So no, not bullshit.
Flynn's lawyer is working on having his conviction overturned. Stone is also appealing his conviction even though he's already received commutation.
So? To date, neither of them have had their convictions overturned.
 
Meh. BJ Clinton likes to diddle 16 year old girls. No harm, no foul. Unlike many Hollywood celebrities, at least these girls were beyond puberty.
And what if those diddled girls didn't want to be diddled but were forced? No harm or foul then, too? And how about 12 year olds that looked 15 or 16? Or even younger? And boys. You KNOW there were boys there too. Those pervs would fuck a tree knot hole if it got them off.
GRACIE!!!! Language....true but LANGUAGE!!!! I'm a young innocent and never heard such a thing!!!

.....but by Crikey I'm going to use it against some libtards!!!!

Greg
 
As far as the others, I didn't leave them out. None of them were ever indicted.
That doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes. And that fat lady hasn't started singing yet. One or more of them may be prosecuted before it's over.
Of course it means they didn't commit crimes. They were investigated, and some investigations are ongoing, and to date,, no charges were brought forth.
Durham hasn't submitted his report yet. He's not as restricted as the IG was.
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
You're quick to call people dumbfucks, dumbfuck.



Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court | The Independent
Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court ordered former President Bill Clinton to be disbarred from practising law before the high court and gave him 40 days to contest the order.The court did not explain its reasons ...


FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court ...
FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court opened its new session Monday with an order barring former President Clinton from practicing law before the court.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - The New York Times
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
Oct 1, 2001The Supreme Court said today that former President Bill Clinton, who was disciplined in Arkansas, cannot practice before the High Court. ... Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court.


Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined ...
Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined After Impeachment | Breitbart
Clinton's law license in Arkansas was suspended for five years, and he paid a $25,000 fine. The Supreme Court also barred Clinton from practicing law before the nation's highest court. Trump made a reference to an $850,000 fine Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.


Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred | World news ...
Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred
Oct 2, 2001The US supreme court yesterday issued an order disbarring former president Bill Clinton from practicing law before the high court. The ruling is seen as marking the official end of the Monica ...


Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Bill Clinton Disbarred Over Lewinsky Scandal. Historians might regard the final chapter of the most troubling aspect of Bill Clinton's presidency to have occurred after he left office. On October 1, 2001, the United States Supreme Court announced Bill Clinton was disbarred over the Lewinsky scandal.



As Bad as Clinton? - WSJ
Opinion | As Bad as Clinton?
The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court.. In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a ...
 
Of course they had due process. Had they not, they wouldn't have been convicted.
Bullshit. Due process precludes the withholding of exculpatory evidence by the prosecutor.
If that were true, they would have had their convictions overturned. None of them have. So no, not bullshit.
Flynn's lawyer is working on having his conviction overturned. Stone is also appealing his conviction even though he's already received commutation.
So? To date, neither of them have had their convictions overturned.
Duh! :rolleyes:
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
You're quick to call people dumbfucks, dumbfuck.



Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court | The Independent
Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court ordered former President Bill Clinton to be disbarred from practising law before the high court and gave him 40 days to contest the order.The court did not explain its reasons ...


FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court ...
FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court opened its new session Monday with an order barring former President Clinton from practicing law before the court.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - The New York Times
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
Oct 1, 2001The Supreme Court said today that former President Bill Clinton, who was disciplined in Arkansas, cannot practice before the High Court. ... Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court.


Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined ...
Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined After Impeachment | Breitbart
Clinton's law license in Arkansas was suspended for five years, and he paid a $25,000 fine. The Supreme Court also barred Clinton from practicing law before the nation's highest court. Trump made a reference to an $850,000 fine Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.


Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred | World news ...
Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred
Oct 2, 2001The US supreme court yesterday issued an order disbarring former president Bill Clinton from practicing law before the high court. The ruling is seen as marking the official end of the Monica ...


Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Bill Clinton Disbarred Over Lewinsky Scandal. Historians might regard the final chapter of the most troubling aspect of Bill Clinton's presidency to have occurred after he left office. On October 1, 2001, the United States Supreme Court announced Bill Clinton was disbarred over the Lewinsky scandal.



As Bad as Clinton? - WSJ
Opinion | As Bad as Clinton?
The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court.. In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a ...
Wow, look at all those links. :ack-1:

I guess you showed me, huh? I mean, shit, I have only 1 link and you have 7. But then again, my 1 link goes directly to the source, the Supreme Court, while none of yours do. And of course, the Supreme Court said he was "suspended" for 40 days, during which period, he could show the court reason for him not to be disbarred following the suspension. They also say he resigned instead. So no, he was not disbarred...

MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Discipline of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
Attorney Discipline
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 1, 2001, is discharged.
[emphasis added to highlight Clinton's "suspension"]

So, dumbfuck, do you see now why I call you a dumbfuck?

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
You're quick to call people dumbfucks, dumbfuck.



Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court | The Independent
Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court ordered former President Bill Clinton to be disbarred from practising law before the high court and gave him 40 days to contest the order.The court did not explain its reasons ...


FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court ...
FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court opened its new session Monday with an order barring former President Clinton from practicing law before the court.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - The New York Times
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
Oct 1, 2001The Supreme Court said today that former President Bill Clinton, who was disciplined in Arkansas, cannot practice before the High Court. ... Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court.


Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined ...
Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined After Impeachment | Breitbart
Clinton's law license in Arkansas was suspended for five years, and he paid a $25,000 fine. The Supreme Court also barred Clinton from practicing law before the nation's highest court. Trump made a reference to an $850,000 fine Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.


Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred | World news ...
Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred
Oct 2, 2001The US supreme court yesterday issued an order disbarring former president Bill Clinton from practicing law before the high court. The ruling is seen as marking the official end of the Monica ...


Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Bill Clinton Disbarred Over Lewinsky Scandal. Historians might regard the final chapter of the most troubling aspect of Bill Clinton's presidency to have occurred after he left office. On October 1, 2001, the United States Supreme Court announced Bill Clinton was disbarred over the Lewinsky scandal.



As Bad as Clinton? - WSJ
Opinion | As Bad as Clinton?
The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court.. In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a ...
Wow, look at all those links. :ack-1:

I guess you showed me, huh? I mean, shit, I have only 1 link and you have 7. But then again, my 1 link goes directly to the source, the Supreme Court, while none of yours do. And of course, the Supreme Court said he was "suspended" for 40 days, during which period, he could show the court reason for him not to be disbarred following the suspension. They also say he resigned instead. So no, he was not disbarred...

MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Discipline of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
Attorney Discipline
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 1, 2001, is discharged.
[emphasis added to highlight Clinton's "suspension"]

So, dumbfuck, do you see now why I call you a dumbfuck?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Calling me something does not mean that's what I am.

You seem to be arguing semantics and ignoring logic. Typical for dumbfucks like you. I guess it all depends on what the definition of is is.

The SCOTUS ruled that Clinton could no longer practice law at the court (he would be disbarred) and gave him 40 days to contest the order. He did not contest the order. Therefore he was disbarred.

You rather stupidly contend that his resigning from the bar instead of contesting the order negates the forceful action by which the court removed him. That's akin to hearing your employer say, "You're fired!" and blurting back, "Oh really? I quit!" and then telling your friends that you've never been fired from a job.

Nay, nay, little one. It is you that suffers a deficiency of logic.
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
You're quick to call people dumbfucks, dumbfuck.



Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court | The Independent
Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court ordered former President Bill Clinton to be disbarred from practising law before the high court and gave him 40 days to contest the order.The court did not explain its reasons ...


FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court ...
FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court opened its new session Monday with an order barring former President Clinton from practicing law before the court.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - The New York Times
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
Oct 1, 2001The Supreme Court said today that former President Bill Clinton, who was disciplined in Arkansas, cannot practice before the High Court. ... Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court.


Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined ...
Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined After Impeachment | Breitbart
Clinton's law license in Arkansas was suspended for five years, and he paid a $25,000 fine. The Supreme Court also barred Clinton from practicing law before the nation's highest court. Trump made a reference to an $850,000 fine Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.


Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred | World news ...
Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred
Oct 2, 2001The US supreme court yesterday issued an order disbarring former president Bill Clinton from practicing law before the high court. The ruling is seen as marking the official end of the Monica ...


Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Bill Clinton Disbarred Over Lewinsky Scandal. Historians might regard the final chapter of the most troubling aspect of Bill Clinton's presidency to have occurred after he left office. On October 1, 2001, the United States Supreme Court announced Bill Clinton was disbarred over the Lewinsky scandal.



As Bad as Clinton? - WSJ
Opinion | As Bad as Clinton?
The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court.. In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a ...
Wow, look at all those links. :ack-1:

I guess you showed me, huh? I mean, shit, I have only 1 link and you have 7. But then again, my 1 link goes directly to the source, the Supreme Court, while none of yours do. And of course, the Supreme Court said he was "suspended" for 40 days, during which period, he could show the court reason for him not to be disbarred following the suspension. They also say he resigned instead. So no, he was not disbarred...

MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Discipline of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
Attorney Discipline
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 1, 2001, is discharged.
[emphasis added to highlight Clinton's "suspension"]

So, dumbfuck, do you see now why I call you a dumbfuck?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Calling me something does not mean that's what I am.

You seem to be arguing semantics and ignoring logic. Typical for dumbfucks like you. I guess it all depends on what the definition of is is.

The SCOTUS ruled that Clinton could no longer practice law at the court (he would be disbarred) and gave him 40 days to contest the order. He did not contest the order. Therefore he was disbarred.

You rather stupidly contend that his resigning from the bar instead of contesting the order negates the forceful action by which the court removed him. That's akin to hearing your employer say, "You're fired!" and blurting back, "Oh really? I quit!" and then telling your friends that you've never been fired from a job.

Nay, nay, little one. It is you that suffers a deficiency of logic.
LOLOLOL

Your dumbfuckery is growing. He was not disbarred. He resigned. They can't disbar someone who's not on their bar. Even common sense eludes you.
 
Meanwhile..this seems interesting:


Wut?? Gracie, you sayin' Bill Clinton avoided the draft?

Did you vote for president BoneSpurs? Are you voting for him in November? Let's see just how big of a hypocrite you really are...

:popcorn:


Are you voting for jesuit Joe, the pedo, lil faun, the perv? Would you let him sniff your hair?

:auiqs.jpg:

LOLOL

Now you think Biden is a pedophile too? Who ever accused him of that?

Here's the thing, you like using the media and sources to sling your bullcrap all over the place, and using it to accuse people of criminality too. So if your bullcrap spewed was true, then how come we don't see any criminal convictions, just your mouth running on this site making claims you can't back up with proof of indictments or jail time given ???? No it's all political with you, but you point the fingers at others as if you are the smart one. LOL.

LOLOL

You don't see criminal convictions?? You must be blind. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Papadopoulos, Cohen. Who did I leave out?

I'm talking about the big fish, otherwise the ones you love to accuse daily (Trump especially), but none of them are in jail. Not talking about all the little minions in government or politics that don't matter, but I'm talking about those you politically target for political reasons. Why are they not in jail if you are so sure of yourself or so smart about these things ???

Dumbfuck, a sitting president can't be indicted. Have you been paying attention at all?

Bullcrap, Clinton was charged with lying under oath. Trump was cleared, yet you run around yelling impeached Trump, impeached Trump... LOL.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, Clinton was acquitted by the Senate the same as Impeached Trump.

Ok, so why aren't you running around hollaring "impeached Clinton, impeached Clinton" you political hack ??

The real question you should be asking is why does it bother you so much?

Why does what bother me so much ?
 
Meanwhile..this seems interesting:


Wut?? Gracie, you sayin' Bill Clinton avoided the draft?

Did you vote for president BoneSpurs? Are you voting for him in November? Let's see just how big of a hypocrite you really are...

:popcorn:


Are you voting for jesuit Joe, the pedo, lil faun, the perv? Would you let him sniff your hair?

:auiqs.jpg:

LOLOL

Now you think Biden is a pedophile too? Who ever accused him of that?

Here's the thing, you like using the media and sources to sling your bullcrap all over the place, and using it to accuse people of criminality too. So if your bullcrap spewed was true, then how come we don't see any criminal convictions, just your mouth running on this site making claims you can't back up with proof of indictments or jail time given ???? No it's all political with you, but you point the fingers at others as if you are the smart one. LOL.

LOLOL

You don't see criminal convictions?? You must be blind. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Papadopoulos, Cohen. Who did I leave out?

I'm talking about the big fish, otherwise the ones you love to accuse daily (Trump especially), but none of them are in jail. Not talking about all the little minions in government or politics that don't matter, but I'm talking about those you politically target for political reasons. Why are they not in jail if you are so sure of yourself or so smart about these things ???

Dumbfuck, a sitting president can't be indicted. Have you been paying attention at all?

Bullcrap, Clinton was charged with lying under oath. Trump was cleared, yet you run around yelling impeached Trump, impeached Trump... LOL.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, Clinton was acquitted by the Senate the same as Impeached Trump.

Ok, so why aren't you running around hollaring "impeached Clinton, impeached Clinton" you political hack ??

The real question you should be asking is why does it bother you so much?

Why does what bother me so much ?

How would I know?
 
Separately, he did face a possible disbarment from arguing cases before the Supreme Court, but again, as he no longer practiced law anyway, he chose to resign from that court's practice. So no, he was never disbarred.
No. He was suspended for 5 years in Arkansas and disbarred by the SCOTUS.

Dumbfuck, are you hard-of-reading??

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.
[...]
The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

That was a 40 day suspension. Prior to that 40 day period elapsing where he might have faced permanent disbarment, he resigned from that court's bar instead.

He resigned, he wasn't disbarred.

Savvy?
You're quick to call people dumbfucks, dumbfuck.



Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court | The Independent
Clinton disbarred by Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court ordered former President Bill Clinton to be disbarred from practising law before the high court and gave him 40 days to contest the order.The court did not explain its reasons ...


FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court ...
FOXNews.com - Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court opened its new session Monday with an order barring former President Clinton from practicing law before the court.


Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court - The New York Times
Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court
Oct 1, 2001The Supreme Court said today that former President Bill Clinton, who was disciplined in Arkansas, cannot practice before the High Court. ... Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court.


Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined ...
Fact-Check: Yes, Bill Clinton Was Disbarred and Fined After Impeachment | Breitbart
Clinton's law license in Arkansas was suspended for five years, and he paid a $25,000 fine. The Supreme Court also barred Clinton from practicing law before the nation's highest court. Trump made a reference to an $850,000 fine Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.


Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred | World news ...
Lewinsky scandal ends as Clinton is disbarred
Oct 2, 2001The US supreme court yesterday issued an order disbarring former president Bill Clinton from practicing law before the high court. The ruling is seen as marking the official end of the Monica ...


Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Was Bill Clinton Disbarred for the Lewinsky Scandal?
Bill Clinton Disbarred Over Lewinsky Scandal. Historians might regard the final chapter of the most troubling aspect of Bill Clinton's presidency to have occurred after he left office. On October 1, 2001, the United States Supreme Court announced Bill Clinton was disbarred over the Lewinsky scandal.



As Bad as Clinton? - WSJ
Opinion | As Bad as Clinton?
The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court.. In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a ...
Wow, look at all those links. :ack-1:

I guess you showed me, huh? I mean, shit, I have only 1 link and you have 7. But then again, my 1 link goes directly to the source, the Supreme Court, while none of yours do. And of course, the Supreme Court said he was "suspended" for 40 days, during which period, he could show the court reason for him not to be disbarred following the suspension. They also say he resigned instead. So no, he was not disbarred...

MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Discipline of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
Attorney Discipline
No. D–2270. In the Matter of Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 1, 2001, is discharged.
[emphasis added to highlight Clinton's "suspension"]

So, dumbfuck, do you see now why I call you a dumbfuck?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Calling me something does not mean that's what I am.

You seem to be arguing semantics and ignoring logic. Typical for dumbfucks like you. I guess it all depends on what the definition of is is.

The SCOTUS ruled that Clinton could no longer practice law at the court (he would be disbarred) and gave him 40 days to contest the order. He did not contest the order. Therefore he was disbarred.

You rather stupidly contend that his resigning from the bar instead of contesting the order negates the forceful action by which the court removed him. That's akin to hearing your employer say, "You're fired!" and blurting back, "Oh really? I quit!" and then telling your friends that you've never been fired from a job.

Nay, nay, little one. It is you that suffers a deficiency of logic.
LOLOLOL

Your dumbfuckery is growing. He was not disbarred. He resigned. They can't disbar someone who's not on their bar. Even common sense eludes you.
:lastword1:

:laughing0301:
 

Forum List

Back
Top