Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[Moonglow]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

Economic Professor this week

Only incognito so shh..

 

[mudwhistle]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president. The income tax was supposed to be just an emergency tax. It wasn't created to fund social programs that Democrats need to get elected. FDR made federal income taxes what it is today.

 

[Moonglow]

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.”

But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

404 Not Found

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2007_05_Imprimis.pdf

It wasn't capitalism it was industrialism. When in England the industrial revolution began the major problem was financing, so the fiat currency system was created and paper money use overtook coinage and precious metals..This was done by the state, not an individual on a capitalistic system.

 

[danielpalos]

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.”

But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

404 Not Found

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2007_05_Imprimis.pdf

Government is socialism. The left is merely learning how to use Capitalism, for all of its capital worth in modern times.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Left Wing economics enslaves the middle class and it doesn’t lift the poor, it only makes the Left Wing politicians fabulously wealthy and powerful.
The key factor is having enough brainwashed crackpot fanatics to elect the dishonest Left Wing politicians.

 

[Moonglow]

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

 

[mudwhistle]

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.”

But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

404 Not Found

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2007_05_Imprimis.pdf

Government is socialism. The left is merely learning how to use Capitalism, for all of its capital worth in modern times.

The Bill of Rights was created to prevent the Federal Government from abusing our rights. It was a check on government.
That's why Democrats want to repeal parts of it.....like the 2nd Amendment.

 

[mudwhistle]

The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

But FDR turned it into a socialist program that it is today.
So essentially, he created it's current form.

 

[Moonglow]

Left Wing economics enslaves the middle class and it doesn’t lift the poor, it only makes the Left Wing politicians fabulously wealthy and powerful.
The key factor is having enough brainwashed crackpot fanatics to elect the dishonest Left Wing politicians.

Left winged? Be direct, leftist include many political groups in the US we have two political groups in power, no more, no less and not a one is leftist that is in power, just like Repubs are not rightist and conservatives that support liberal policy(bill of rights) are not really conservatives...
As far as your claims that Democrats are more wealthy that Republicans because of direct taxation is a lie since none of them handle the funds directly.
Notice how taxation never ceases when Republicans are in charge.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

It’s easy to see that the middle class either flees or dies when the Democrats cease control of a city or state.
The middle class has fled NYC and LA.
A robust and healthy middle class is the key to prosperity.
The Democrat Politicians are always attempting to say that they are trying to help the middle class LOL

 

[danielpalos]

Left Wing economics enslaves the middle class and it doesn’t lift the poor, it only makes the Left Wing politicians fabulously wealthy and powerful.
The key factor is having enough brainwashed crackpot fanatics to elect the dishonest Left Wing politicians.

with a higher minimum wage and compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment?

 

[sparky]

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

But FDR turned it into a socialist program that it is today.
So essentially, he created it's current form.

But that metric, the pentagon is the biggest socialist taxation in our history

~S~

 

[Moonglow]

Is that why people yell about how the US is stealing their income through taxes?

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

But FDR turned it into a socialist program that it is today.
So essentially, he created it's current form.

Fabian socialism was in Great Britain before it made its way into the US political system and FDR wasn't the first to implement parts of it.
The Republicans did a very bad job of handling the crisis known as the Great Depression or the collapse of capitalism and the US populace wanted their govt. to do something. Thus was the era of experimenting with (at the time) successful forms of govt. Yet the Us went on to become the world's leader only through warfare and not by commercial means. No matter which form or system of economic or social/governmental systems used they fail, not the systems, the humans running the systems.

 

[Moonglow]

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

But FDR turned it into a socialist program that it is today.
So essentially, he created it's current form.

But that metric, the pentagon is the biggest socialist taxation in our history

~S~

And I enjoyed being a member.

 

[danielpalos]

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.”

But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

404 Not Found

http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2007_05_Imprimis.pdf

Government is socialism. The left is merely learning how to use Capitalism, for all of its capital worth in modern times.

The Bill of Rights was created to prevent the Federal Government from abusing our rights. It was a check on government.
That's why Democrats want to repeal parts of it.....the the 2nd Amendment.

Organize more militia. We should have no security problems in our free States.

Don't grab guns; grab gun lovers and regulate them well.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Left has destroyed the middle class in Venezuela and Cuba.

Left Wing economics enslaves the middle class and it doesn’t lift the poor, it only makes the Left Wing politicians fabulously wealthy and powerful.
The key factor is having enough brainwashed crackpot fanatics to elect the dishonest Left Wing politicians.

The real reason why the Democratic Party wants open borders is because they need poor uneducated anti-American moochers to survive.
It's why they are offering "free" healthcare to non citizens to be paid for by the middle class taxpayers.

 

[mudwhistle]

Don't be Jim Acosta.
You and I both know that income taxes are nothing but a Socialist program created by FDR.

There were income taxes in the US before FDR duh...

Before FDR it was meant to pay for the Civil War and other wars. It wasn't meant to be a social program. FDR expanded the top marginal rate to 94% in 1944.....something Democrats want to make permanent. They used excise taxes and tariffs to pay for the government since Washington was president.

Income taxes came into use during the era of the Volstead act. With booze and beer being made illegal except when prescribed by a doctor as a nerve tonic the US received the majority of its revenue from the tax on beer and liquor. Subsequently income taxes took the place of the illegal product which could no longer be taxed. It was long before FDR stepped into the ring as president.
The 16th amendment was passed which included direct taxation and Congress enacted an income tax in October 1913 as part of the Revenue Act of 1913.

But FDR turned it into a socialist program that it is today.
So essentially, he created it's current form.

Fabian socialism was in Great Britain before it made its way into the US political system and FDR wasn't the first to implement parts of it.
The Republicans did a very bad job of handling the crisis known as the Great Depression or the collapse of capitalism and the US populace wanted their govt. to do something. Thus was the era of experimenting with (at the time) successful forms of govt. Yet the Us went on to become the world's leader only through warfare and not by commercial means. No matter which form or system of economic or social/governmental systems used they fail, not the systems, the humans running the systems.

We are still talking about federal income tax being used as a primary socialist program in the US government.
If anything, FDR made it what it is today.
You're correct. We had an income tax after it was ratified in the early 1900s, but it wasn't used the way it is today.
Also, to add to that, FDR created Social Security in 1935, which is the primary reason we have a national debt of $21 trillion dollars, because Congress robs the piggy bank every year. Obama doubled the debt by stealing more from the fund than any president in US history, along with his QE policies.

 

[hadit]

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.

That's not what's going on.

 

[danielpalos]

The Left has destroyed the middle class in Venezuela and Cuba.

Left Wing economics enslaves the middle class and it doesn’t lift the poor, it only makes the Left Wing politicians fabulously wealthy and powerful.
The key factor is having enough brainwashed crackpot fanatics to elect the dishonest Left Wing politicians.

The real reason why the Democratic Party wants open borders is because they need poor uneducated anti-American moochers to survive.
It's why they are offering "free" healthcare to non citizens to be paid for by the middle class taxpayers.

just right wing special pleading. Venezuela is a federal republic. Thank Goodness FDR was a left winger.

 

[danielpalos]

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.

That's not what's going on.

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.